There are 115 reasons why Man City are dodgier.

Yeah, it's a conspiracy. Contentious decisions never go against us, always in our favour, because all the officials want us to win, because famously no one dislikes Manchester United.

It’s the PL’s mandate. They told the refs at the start of the season the big teams not doing so well need to be in the running, and do as you need to ensure that.

Keeps the money rolling in, city will have voted for that.

comment by 115 reasons why ours is better (U22832)
posted 1 minute ago
There are 115 reasons why Man City are dodgier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you envious of our glorious 115?
Is that why you want PIGMOL to come lend some support?

comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
It’s the PL’s mandate. They told the refs at the start of the season the big teams not doing so well need to be in the running, and do as you need to ensure that.

Keeps the money rolling in, city will have voted for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But we’re not a big club.
We pride ourselves as the biggest small club in Europe.

I think we’re back, finally

Just won the treble and still obsessed

What a fockin goober

comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
I think we’re back, finally
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not t sure why you're dragging Liverpool into this.

We've been on the wrong end of numerous VAR decisions, it's not even up for debate anymore.

comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin (U2958)
posted 4 minutes ago
Just won the treble and still obsessed

What a fockin goober
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you take down the banner after you lot won the treble?

No big screen, so the fans can believe there was nothing to see here.

comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin (U2958)
posted 7 minutes ago
Just won* the treble* and still obsessed

What a fockin goober
---------------------------------------------------
Fixed

What has this got to do with Liverpool? We're also one game in and had an one-sided refereeing performance against us from another Manc referee and were denied a penalty which I'm sure most referees would have given, although not as clear as the Wolves one last night.

Offside goal allowed against us last season.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Howard Webb appeared on TV a few days after that and reviewed it himself.

He went through it phase by phase and said although it looks offside, it didn't meet any of the criteria to actually give offside. So it was a good goal.

Although he did then say if he'd actually been the ref that day then he would have disallowed it anyway. Corrupt b*stard.

comment by Gilbert Napthine (U15867)
posted 13 minutes ago
Offside goal allowed against us last season.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Howard Webb appeared on TV a few days after that and reviewed it himself.

He went through it phase by phase and said although it looks offside, it didn't meet any of the criteria to actually give offside. So it was a good goal.

Although he did then say if he'd actually been the ref that day then he would have disallowed it anyway. Corrupt b*stard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that the Rashford one? Absolutely offside. The guy faked a shot ffs from an offside position drawing the defender towards him when he could have been on Fernandes who wasn't offside.

Ridiculous decision as was the Rashford offside against Liverpool where they claimed they had brought in a higher tolerance for offsides and thicker lines so whilst offside it didn't fall within these new guidelines, yet I don't remember any other offside being given as onside for this reason throughout the season.

When you look at the penalty given in the Cup Final then look at the one not given last, night it's hard to accept there isn't bias or corruption.

Wolves should have won 7-1

https://youtu.be/1o3mxNF9Mgk

As a neutral, I didn't think the decision yesterday was as blatant as everyone is making out. Not saying it's not a pen, but I felt it was a 50/50 call. No one else seems to agree with me though

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 3 minutes ago
As a neutral, I didn't think the decision yesterday was as blatant as everyone is making out. Not saying it's not a pen, but I felt it was a 50/50 call. No one else seems to agree with me though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do.

Imagine being a City fan and saying it's unfair. 😂

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 11 minutes ago
As a neutral, I didn't think the decision yesterday was as blatant as everyone is making out. Not saying it's not a pen, but I felt it was a 50/50 call. No one else seems to agree with me though
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought more of a 70/30. Should have been given but I can see why it wasn't. I doubt it was even the worst decision this weekend, let alone "the worst I've ever seen" as many have said.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 24 minutes ago
When you look at the penalty given in the Cup Final then look at the one not given last, night it's hard to accept there isn't bias or corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And Liverpool? Didn't watch the Chelsea game then?

I expect we will get some ridiculous decisions not given for us now for a few weeks like after the Klopp penalty comments.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 26 minutes ago
When you look at the penalty given in the Cup Final then look at the one not given last, night it's hard to accept there isn't bias or corruption.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Behave, grealish knew what he was doing