The Euro authorities were always going to return when Man Cheaty won the CL. They’ve kicked the hornets nest now.
No danger of that ever happening to us, thankfully. Whilst the owners of our rivals try to find new and exciting ways to cheat FFP rules, our owners leak to the press that we can only spend 120 million net in a window and we're meant to believe them. God, I hate the Glazers. The only owners who take a limiting factor and use it as an excuse to not spend. This is what we're up against. People desperate for success vs people desperate not to spend. No doubt Avi is still smiling sarcastically though so it's all good
Did you actually read the article?
Dwight obviously didn't, saw the headline and couldn't post a link quickly enough.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 56 minutes ago
Did you actually read the article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a common trend with Dwight. He posts links to his articles that do not come even close to saying what he thinks they say.
It takes a special kind of dimwit to continually do this.
And you are in a probable new investigation. But the current one is potentially dangerous to you.
It was 'written' by Nick Harris, the only person (to my knowledge) who's blocked me on Twitter and every other site he contributes to that allows comments.
I've never insulted him, only asked why he always uses 'unnamed sources' for all his City articles and why these stories fail to gain any traction beyond the Daily Mail.
Even the Times hinted that one of his previous yarns was sponsored by the Qataris for political, rather than sporting reasons.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
It was 'written' by Nick Harris, the only person (to my knowledge) who's blocked me on Twitter and every other site he contributes to that allows comments.
I've never insulted him, only asked why he always uses 'unnamed sources' for all his City articles and why these stories fail to gain any traction beyond the Daily Mail.
Even the Times hinted that one of his previous yarns was sponsored by the Qataris for political, rather than sporting reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf he probably blocked you because your a bit of a pr7k bonky. Nothing personal, just he probably realised your full of chit and a top
🥰
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
It was 'written' by Nick Harris, the only person (to my knowledge) who's blocked me on Twitter and every other site he contributes to that allows comments.
I've never insulted him, only asked why he always uses 'unnamed sources' for all his City articles and why these stories fail to gain any traction beyond the Daily Mail.
Even the Times hinted that one of his previous yarns was sponsored by the Qataris for political, rather than sporting reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf he probably blocked you because your a bit of a pr7k bonky. Nothing personal, just he probably realised your full of chit and a top
🥰
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, I exposed his lies, I called him out and he blocked me and 100's of others.
He's a Liverpool fan btw.
He could actually be Dwight, same levels of obsession, same lack of knowledge.
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 7 minutes ago
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 13 minutes ago
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The article said City are 'suspected' to be one of the clubs.
An assumption based on absolutely no evidence other than a tip from an 'annoymous source'.
If you're on Twitter, check out Nick Harris - 60% of his Tweets are slagging City off, the other 40% are blowing smoke up Liverpool's collective ringpiece.
He never mentions United, I'd take that as an insult as he doesn't take you as a credible threat.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 13 minutes ago
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The article said City are 'suspected' to be one of the clubs.
An assumption based on absolutely no evidence other than a tip from an 'annoymous source'.
If you're on Twitter, check out Nick Harris - 60% of his Tweets are slagging City off, the other 40% are blowing smoke up Liverpool's collective ringpiece.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like I said....I will grant you this one on this particular article. Doesn't matter much in grand scheme of things. There's more smoke than bonfire night about your wrong doings.
An innocent club would have made it all go away by now. 👍
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 minutes ago
He never mentions United, I'd take that as an insult as he doesn't take you as a credible threat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We aren't a credible threat under these owners and current board. Won't hear me say otherwise.
The next time we win the league or CL will be under a new ownership.
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan' always team bonky
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please' of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 40 seconds ago
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan'always team bonky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Binky is a proper fan
Goes 2 games
Used 2b a ultra
Defends ‘his’ team despite knowing they r cheating, financially dope, actually doped n over 100 uther criminals
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan'always team bonky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are totally irrelevent in the Circle of Life yet still manage to stand out as a goat molesting nonce.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan'always team bonky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are totally irrelevent in the Circle of Life yet still manage to stand out as a goat molesting nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Se85 called and wanted his bestest fan trophy back. Just try not to cheat to post it back to him from Stockport Bingley
Never mind, one day a parent or responsible adult may take you to a game.
Write to Santa.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Charges just keep racking up
Page 1 of 1
posted on 27/8/23
Shocking
posted on 27/8/23
The Euro authorities were always going to return when Man Cheaty won the CL. They’ve kicked the hornets nest now.
posted on 27/8/23
No danger of that ever happening to us, thankfully. Whilst the owners of our rivals try to find new and exciting ways to cheat FFP rules, our owners leak to the press that we can only spend 120 million net in a window and we're meant to believe them. God, I hate the Glazers. The only owners who take a limiting factor and use it as an excuse to not spend. This is what we're up against. People desperate for success vs people desperate not to spend. No doubt Avi is still smiling sarcastically though so it's all good
posted on 27/8/23
Did you actually read the article?
posted on 27/8/23
I did.
posted on 27/8/23
Dwight obviously didn't, saw the headline and couldn't post a link quickly enough.
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 56 minutes ago
Did you actually read the article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a common trend with Dwight. He posts links to his articles that do not come even close to saying what he thinks they say.
It takes a special kind of dimwit to continually do this.
posted on 27/8/23
And you are in a probable new investigation. But the current one is potentially dangerous to you.
posted on 27/8/23
It was 'written' by Nick Harris, the only person (to my knowledge) who's blocked me on Twitter and every other site he contributes to that allows comments.
I've never insulted him, only asked why he always uses 'unnamed sources' for all his City articles and why these stories fail to gain any traction beyond the Daily Mail.
Even the Times hinted that one of his previous yarns was sponsored by the Qataris for political, rather than sporting reasons.
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
It was 'written' by Nick Harris, the only person (to my knowledge) who's blocked me on Twitter and every other site he contributes to that allows comments.
I've never insulted him, only asked why he always uses 'unnamed sources' for all his City articles and why these stories fail to gain any traction beyond the Daily Mail.
Even the Times hinted that one of his previous yarns was sponsored by the Qataris for political, rather than sporting reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf he probably blocked you because your a bit of a pr7k bonky. Nothing personal, just he probably realised your full of chit and a top
🥰
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
It was 'written' by Nick Harris, the only person (to my knowledge) who's blocked me on Twitter and every other site he contributes to that allows comments.
I've never insulted him, only asked why he always uses 'unnamed sources' for all his City articles and why these stories fail to gain any traction beyond the Daily Mail.
Even the Times hinted that one of his previous yarns was sponsored by the Qataris for political, rather than sporting reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf he probably blocked you because your a bit of a pr7k bonky. Nothing personal, just he probably realised your full of chit and a top
🥰
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, I exposed his lies, I called him out and he blocked me and 100's of others.
He's a Liverpool fan btw.
posted on 27/8/23
He could actually be Dwight, same levels of obsession, same lack of knowledge.
posted on 27/8/23
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 7 minutes ago
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 13 minutes ago
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The article said City are 'suspected' to be one of the clubs.
An assumption based on absolutely no evidence other than a tip from an 'annoymous source'.
If you're on Twitter, check out Nick Harris - 60% of his Tweets are slagging City off, the other 40% are blowing smoke up Liverpool's collective ringpiece.
posted on 27/8/23
He never mentions United, I'd take that as an insult as he doesn't take you as a credible threat.
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 13 minutes ago
City are innocent. They didn't do anything wrong and those leaked emails were faked. In fact there's a conspiracy against the club and owner and everyone is on it because they are just jealous of the owner's wealth.
Am I doing it right? When do I get my bitter blue badge?
The whole football world knows City haven't been playing by the rules. This article's credibility is ultimately meaningless. There's lot of other sources that aren't and don't paint City in a good light whatsoever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The article said City are 'suspected' to be one of the clubs.
An assumption based on absolutely no evidence other than a tip from an 'annoymous source'.
If you're on Twitter, check out Nick Harris - 60% of his Tweets are slagging City off, the other 40% are blowing smoke up Liverpool's collective ringpiece.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like I said....I will grant you this one on this particular article. Doesn't matter much in grand scheme of things. There's more smoke than bonfire night about your wrong doings.
An innocent club would have made it all go away by now. 👍
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 minutes ago
He never mentions United, I'd take that as an insult as he doesn't take you as a credible threat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We aren't a credible threat under these owners and current board. Won't hear me say otherwise.
The next time we win the league or CL will be under a new ownership.
posted on 27/8/23
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan' always team bonky
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please' of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 40 seconds ago
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan'always team bonky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Binky is a proper fan
Goes 2 games
Used 2b a ultra
Defends ‘his’ team despite knowing they r cheating, financially dope, actually doped n over 100 uther criminals
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan'always team bonky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are totally irrelevent in the Circle of Life yet still manage to stand out as a goat molesting nonce.
posted on 27/8/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boris knows his team are relevant because of a sugar daddy. He also knows deep down they broke rules. Bit in the binky vs se85(bestest match going top going 'fan'always team bonky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are totally irrelevent in the Circle of Life yet still manage to stand out as a goat molesting nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Se85 called and wanted his bestest fan trophy back. Just try not to cheat to post it back to him from Stockport Bingley
posted on 27/8/23
Never mind, one day a parent or responsible adult may take you to a game.
Write to Santa.
Page 1 of 1