I’m on team ban. They’re clearly dangerous dogs. As I understand, while no official metrics on dog attacks in UK, groups that try to gain this information estimate 43% of dog attacks in UK are these breeds. They’re intensively in bred (ja bans proper use of word lol) for aggression and ultimately unlike other breeds a) you probably do need special and unique training as an owner to keep it safe b) what’s the point in society of even having a dog bred like this.
There has to be regulation, no one should have a right to own a dangerous animal. Some dog breeds it doesn’t matter how they’re raised they won’t go out and kill people. Either regulate people who can own dangerous breeds or just ban them imo
If it's illegal it gets put down
Lethal weapons in the wrong hands. Shame for those that have trained theirs properly
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
Bred to kill, they are not family pets, even if they have been trained they can turn at any moment.
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 1 minute ago
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, often the owners are too young or too lightweight to own let alone control one.
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 1 minute ago
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Status symbols to some.
comment by Vorsprung durch Poch (U1641)
posted 2 minutes ago
I’m on team ban. They’re clearly dangerous dogs. As I understand, while no official metrics on dog attacks in UK, groups that try to gain this information estimate 43% of dog attacks in UK are these breeds. They’re intensively in bred (ja bans proper use of word lol) for aggression and ultimately unlike other breeds a) you probably do need special and unique training as an owner to keep it safe b) what’s the point in society of even having a dog bred like this.
There has to be regulation, no one should have a right to own a dangerous animal. Some dog breeds it doesn’t matter how they’re raised they won’t go out and kill people. Either regulate people who can own dangerous breeds or just ban them imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you're missing the point? Sections of society buy them specifically because they want the image and edginess that such an animal adds to their persona.
Add to that the deliberate cutting of ears to make them look even more aggressive and it probably ought to be banned. BTW instead of banning the cutting of ears they needed to ban the owning of a cut eared dog too before now.
The footage of that guy being attacked after it had attacked the girl sent shivers down my spine. The dog jumped at hit, bit him at shoulder hit, clung on and brought him down.
2 dogs killed that man today and i cannot imagine how utterly terrifying that would be for him and anyone witnessing it.
These dogs do not seem to be owned by responsible owners so should be banned. Those with them already should at the least be muzzled but that will not help them when on private property and tehre are bound to be more tragic accidents.
comment by The Great Dane (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 1 minute ago
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Status symbols to some.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much
I've always found it weird that they use the term "destroy" when they're going to kill a dangerous dog.
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 minute ago
I've always found it weird that they use the term "destroy" when they're going to kill a dangerous dog.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dogs are considered property by the law.
What happens to those dogs already part of the family, will they have to be destroyed?
—————-
Hopefully. Should be some sort of amnesty I reckon where existing owners have say 3 months to have them put down (via a subsidised payment) after which it then becomes punishable by law to own one.
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
comment by Amadou Bakayoko (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣
comment by Amadou Bakayoko (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Vengeance of Kungfu Pea in a Bun (U23079)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Amadou Bakayoko (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it should be. They are the problem. They will just get the model down from the XL and train it in the same way. The only difference is that victims will just die slightly more slowly, prolonging the suffering. Before the dogs are destroyed, they should be made to eat their owners. Like in the final scene of silence of the lambs with the pigs. I think it's that film anyway.
I understand the ban on breeding, I find putting down dogs already raised very harsh.
Won’t the people who just want a big tough looking dog to train to be aggressive and dangerous just get a different kind of dog and still have the same or very similar result? Are the dogs like that in nature more than other breeds, and the ‘good’ ones people have that are loving and nice the exception?
They should create an XL bully farm somewhere, and owners have to cover the cost of neutering and taking care of the dogs until they die. They can visit if they want.
Given the nature of the dogs, they'll probably kill each other in a few months anyway, so it won't cost much.
Good. No point to those dogs. Though I’m not sure what they’ll do with the dogs after ban. Putting down seems harsh
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 minutes ago
I understand the ban on breeding, I find putting down dogs already raised very harsh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well mr Busby I put this to you, what are more of a threat to people's lives and killed someone today, ones that have already been raised or ones that haven't been bred yet, hence don't exist?
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 21 seconds ago
They should create an XL bully farm somewhere, and owners have to cover the cost of neutering and taking care of the dogs until they die. They can visit if they want.
Given the nature of the dogs, they'll probably kill each other in a few months anyway, so it won't cost much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
or leave them unneutered so they breed like bunnies, revert to their wolf-style pack mentality, and then attack the humans to take over the world.
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 21 seconds ago
They should create an XL bully farm somewhere, and owners have to cover the cost of neutering and taking care of the dogs until they die. They can visit if they want.
Given the nature of the dogs, they'll probably kill each other in a few months anyway, so it won't cost much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
or leave them unneutered so they breed like bunnies, revert to their wolf-style pack mentality, and then attack the humans to take over the world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could sell them to a local Korean bbq joint?
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 10 minutes ago
I understand the ban on breeding, I find putting down dogs already raised very harsh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Might seem harsh but it’s only a dog at the end of the day, no point getting knickers in a twist over a dumb animal, put them down and ban them, end of.
Sign in if you want to comment
XL Bully Ban incoming
Page 1 of 5
posted on 15/9/23
I’m on team ban. They’re clearly dangerous dogs. As I understand, while no official metrics on dog attacks in UK, groups that try to gain this information estimate 43% of dog attacks in UK are these breeds. They’re intensively in bred (ja bans proper use of word lol) for aggression and ultimately unlike other breeds a) you probably do need special and unique training as an owner to keep it safe b) what’s the point in society of even having a dog bred like this.
There has to be regulation, no one should have a right to own a dangerous animal. Some dog breeds it doesn’t matter how they’re raised they won’t go out and kill people. Either regulate people who can own dangerous breeds or just ban them imo
posted on 15/9/23
If it's illegal it gets put down
posted on 15/9/23
Lethal weapons in the wrong hands. Shame for those that have trained theirs properly
posted on 15/9/23
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
posted on 15/9/23
Bred to kill, they are not family pets, even if they have been trained they can turn at any moment.
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 1 minute ago
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, often the owners are too young or too lightweight to own let alone control one.
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 1 minute ago
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Status symbols to some.
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Vorsprung durch Poch (U1641)
posted 2 minutes ago
I’m on team ban. They’re clearly dangerous dogs. As I understand, while no official metrics on dog attacks in UK, groups that try to gain this information estimate 43% of dog attacks in UK are these breeds. They’re intensively in bred (ja bans proper use of word lol) for aggression and ultimately unlike other breeds a) you probably do need special and unique training as an owner to keep it safe b) what’s the point in society of even having a dog bred like this.
There has to be regulation, no one should have a right to own a dangerous animal. Some dog breeds it doesn’t matter how they’re raised they won’t go out and kill people. Either regulate people who can own dangerous breeds or just ban them imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you're missing the point? Sections of society buy them specifically because they want the image and edginess that such an animal adds to their persona.
Add to that the deliberate cutting of ears to make them look even more aggressive and it probably ought to be banned. BTW instead of banning the cutting of ears they needed to ban the owning of a cut eared dog too before now.
posted on 15/9/23
The footage of that guy being attacked after it had attacked the girl sent shivers down my spine. The dog jumped at hit, bit him at shoulder hit, clung on and brought him down.
2 dogs killed that man today and i cannot imagine how utterly terrifying that would be for him and anyone witnessing it.
These dogs do not seem to be owned by responsible owners so should be banned. Those with them already should at the least be muzzled but that will not help them when on private property and tehre are bound to be more tragic accidents.
posted on 15/9/23
comment by The Great Dane (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 1 minute ago
Actually great dogs trained appropriately but way too many dckheads who have them for the wrong reasons, they be able to ban that kinda tool owner as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Status symbols to some.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much
posted on 15/9/23
I've always found it weird that they use the term "destroy" when they're going to kill a dangerous dog.
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 minute ago
I've always found it weird that they use the term "destroy" when they're going to kill a dangerous dog.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dogs are considered property by the law.
posted on 15/9/23
What happens to those dogs already part of the family, will they have to be destroyed?
—————-
Hopefully. Should be some sort of amnesty I reckon where existing owners have say 3 months to have them put down (via a subsidised payment) after which it then becomes punishable by law to own one.
posted on 15/9/23
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Amadou Bakayoko (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Amadou Bakayoko (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Vengeance of Kungfu Pea in a Bun (U23079)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Amadou Bakayoko (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
It should be compulsory for the owners to be destroyed with their dogs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it should be. They are the problem. They will just get the model down from the XL and train it in the same way. The only difference is that victims will just die slightly more slowly, prolonging the suffering. Before the dogs are destroyed, they should be made to eat their owners. Like in the final scene of silence of the lambs with the pigs. I think it's that film anyway.
posted on 15/9/23
I understand the ban on breeding, I find putting down dogs already raised very harsh.
posted on 15/9/23
Won’t the people who just want a big tough looking dog to train to be aggressive and dangerous just get a different kind of dog and still have the same or very similar result? Are the dogs like that in nature more than other breeds, and the ‘good’ ones people have that are loving and nice the exception?
posted on 15/9/23
They should create an XL bully farm somewhere, and owners have to cover the cost of neutering and taking care of the dogs until they die. They can visit if they want.
Given the nature of the dogs, they'll probably kill each other in a few months anyway, so it won't cost much.
posted on 15/9/23
Good. No point to those dogs. Though I’m not sure what they’ll do with the dogs after ban. Putting down seems harsh
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 minutes ago
I understand the ban on breeding, I find putting down dogs already raised very harsh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well mr Busby I put this to you, what are more of a threat to people's lives and killed someone today, ones that have already been raised or ones that haven't been bred yet, hence don't exist?
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 21 seconds ago
They should create an XL bully farm somewhere, and owners have to cover the cost of neutering and taking care of the dogs until they die. They can visit if they want.
Given the nature of the dogs, they'll probably kill each other in a few months anyway, so it won't cost much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
or leave them unneutered so they breed like bunnies, revert to their wolf-style pack mentality, and then attack the humans to take over the world.
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 21 seconds ago
They should create an XL bully farm somewhere, and owners have to cover the cost of neutering and taking care of the dogs until they die. They can visit if they want.
Given the nature of the dogs, they'll probably kill each other in a few months anyway, so it won't cost much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
or leave them unneutered so they breed like bunnies, revert to their wolf-style pack mentality, and then attack the humans to take over the world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could sell them to a local Korean bbq joint?
posted on 15/9/23
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 10 minutes ago
I understand the ban on breeding, I find putting down dogs already raised very harsh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Might seem harsh but it’s only a dog at the end of the day, no point getting knickers in a twist over a dumb animal, put them down and ban them, end of.
Page 1 of 5