Did you count how many?

116 cases to answer now

Least he said some. All banter aside it does look dodgy af. Prem refs paid by City owners. Pep brought Barca methods to City

comment by Salah Time. (U23032)
posted 7 minutes ago
116 cases to answer now
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Salah Time. (U23032)
posted 36 minutes ago
116 cases to answer now
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Salah Time. (U23032)
posted 43 minutes ago
116 cases to answer now
----------------------------------------------------------------------

😂😂😂

Repeat offenders 🤡zzz

I believe it

Last season at Anfield, Foden scored a legit goal but PIGMOL had to go back four phases of play to find a fault to disallow that goal.
Liverpool has benefited the most from VAR calls the past three years. They are so used to getting the calls no wonder it spooked them when VAR made that error at White Hart Lane.

comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 7 minutes ago
Last season at Anfield, Foden scored a legit goal but PIGMOL had to go back four phases of play to find a fault to disallow that goal.
Liverpool has benefited the most from VAR calls the past three years. They are so used to getting the calls no wonder it spooked them when VAR made that error at White Hart Lane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This

Where's the conspiracy? The officials who conspired to take the game away from Liverpool are on the payroll of the City owners, with their latest work for them being two days before the Liverpool game.

There were literally two fouls by City players in the lead up to Foden's goal. Are you mad?

Lads will ye stop with the "liverpool get all the var decisions"

comment by THE MISSILE (U13008)
posted 3 minutes ago
Lads will ye stop with the "liverpool get all the var decisions"


----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea where they get it from. Liverpool clearly lead the expected apology stats.

comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 minutes ago
Where's the conspiracy? The officials who conspired to take the game away from Liverpool are on the payroll of the City owners, with their latest work for them being two days before the Liverpool game.

There were literally two fouls by City players in the lead up to Foden's goal. Are you mad?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What Liverpool fans see is often different from what other fans see especially if the decision favours Liverpool.

comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 19 minutes ago
Last season at Anfield, Foden scored a legit goal but PIGMOL had to go back four phases of play to find a fault to disallow that goal.
Liverpool has benefited the most from VAR calls the past three years. They are so used to getting the calls no wonder it spooked them when VAR made that error at White Hart Lane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm no

comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 12 minutes ago
Where's the conspiracy? The officials who conspired to take the game away from Liverpool are on the payroll of the City owners, with their latest work for them being two days before the Liverpool game.

There were literally two fouls by City players in the lead up to Foden's goal. Are you mad?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks that goal should have stood doesn't understand the game.

comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 minutes ago
Where's the conspiracy? The officials who conspired to take the game away from Liverpool are on the payroll of the City owners, with their latest work for them being two days before the Liverpool game.

There were literally two fouls by City players in the lead up to Foden's goal. Are you mad?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What Liverpool fans see is often different from what other fans see especially if the decision favours Liverpool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, you're just mad. Anybody who claims Foden's goal was legit when there were literally two fouls in the buildup doesn't have the mental capacity to objectively discuss a decision. You're mind is quite a simple one, benefits City? Correct decision. Goes against City? Incorrect decision.

comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 19 minutes ago
Last season at Anfield, Foden scored a legit goal but PIGMOL had to go back four phases of play to find a fault to disallow that goal.
Liverpool has benefited the most from VAR calls the past three years. They are so used to getting the calls no wonder it spooked them when VAR made that error at White Hart Lane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm no
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Pretty much all of that us completely made up

comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 12 minutes ago
Where's the conspiracy? The officials who conspired to take the game away from Liverpool are on the payroll of the City owners, with their latest work for them being two days before the Liverpool game.

There were literally two fouls by City players in the lead up to Foden's goal. Are you mad?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks that goal should have stood doesn't understand the game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Translated: anyone who accepts the correct decision doesn't understand the game because it is not in Liverpool's favour.

Haaland and Fabinho tucked each other's shirt near the centre of the pitch. There was three to four phases of play after that incident yet Liverpool got the decision.

Two seasons ago, Milner should have seen red for a foul on Bernado but the ref waved play on because it's at Anfield.

This early in the season and Liverpool fans are already panicking.

City fan doesn't understand what 'conflict of interest' means. Imagine our surprise.

The only thing that will stop Man Cheaty is an HMRC investigation.

Bring it on.

comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 12 minutes ago
Where's the conspiracy? The officials who conspired to take the game away from Liverpool are on the payroll of the City owners, with their latest work for them being two days before the Liverpool game.

There were literally two fouls by City players in the lead up to Foden's goal. Are you mad?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks that goal should have stood doesn't understand the game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Translated: anyone who accepts the correct decision doesn't understand the game because it is not in Liverpool's favour.

Haaland and Fabinho tucked each other's shirt near the centre of the pitch. There was three to four phases of play after that incident yet Liverpool got the decision.

Two seasons ago, Milner should have seen red for a foul on Bernado but the ref waved play on because it's at Anfield.

This early in the season and Liverpool fans are already panicking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haaland fouled Fabinho, but even if he didn't he still kicked the ball out of Alisson's hands just before the goal.

Panicking? If anything we're feeling better about the season considering City lost to Wolves.

comment by Secsual Harrassment Panda (U18716)
posted 2 minutes ago
City fan doesn't understand what 'conflict of interest' means. Imagine our surprise.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
In that case, expect VVD to get a red when we visit Anfield this season.
PIGMOL will see to that.

Now, Liverpool have requested for the VAR audio of the Spurs game.
I bet they are looking for the smoking gun - possibly any mention of the word "Sheikh Mansour" so they can prove their suspicions.

The word "Sheikh Mansour"