Actually feel for the innocent Liverpool fans who are getting dragged along with this cringefest created by Klopp
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 35 seconds ago
Actually feel for the innocent Liverpool fans who are getting dragged along with this cringefest created by Klopp
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell me what's wrong with what klopp has said?
innocent Liverpool fans
———
As if such a thing exists.
If Spurs were honourable!!! Give over man you’re totally delusional
Get over it, it's not happening.
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
How many articles are you going to write about this? You get the odd thing right in so many predictions, its like a 0.01% success rate. Do you really need to milk that 0.01% ?
The laws were incorrectly applied when Kieran Gibbs was sent off against Chelsea after an Oxlade Chanberlain handball. No replay, nor did Arsenal ask for one.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 50 minutes ago
innocent Liverpool fans
———
As if such a thing exists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's like saying handsome Man UTD fans.
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 29 minutes ago
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently var was working for your game
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 31 minutes ago
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should have complained
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 31 minutes ago
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should have complained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not Karen's.
Spurs should accept a replay if Liverpool accept starting with 9 men
How about the west ham Tevez and mascherano farce
If we wanna go back and rewrite history we’d have to go very far back
Personally I’m just waiting for this City financial doping decision to see what earthquakes this cause
G_B mate I’m sure these reta*ss are just on the WUM. Why are they bring up examples from games where VAR, GL tech & other laws applied?
At the end of the day the Premier Leagues own rules for this season state that the VAR was wilfully incorrectly implemented and therefore breached the threshold where a game COULD be replayed.
It’s not rocket science
The Honey monster has really got the salty Karen’s riled up. There won’t be a replay, get over it.
I’ve already accepted that the authorities won’t allow us to beat Liverpool for the next decade at least
comment by 8==Divock - LFC High Reputation Board Member (U22339)
posted 43 minutes ago
G_B mate I’m sure these reta*ss are just on the WUM. Why are they bring up examples from games where VAR, GL tech & other laws applied?
At the end of the day the Premier Leagues own rules for this season state that the VAR was wilfully incorrectly implemented and therefore breached the threshold where a game COULD be replayed.
It’s not rocket science
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were incorrectly implemented 100%. Google willfully carrot boy.
It wasn't done willfully it was pure incompetence and panic. And within the rules of the game once the restart had occurred it couldn't be stopped. If it was then that would be a willfully incorrect implementation of the laws and Spurs could be entitled to a replay.
Football fans are seemingly stupid individuals and dont understand the meaning of unprecedented. Its not a handball, foul. Its not subjective. Its offside onside black or white (since the technology)
Please please replay it, its a meaningless game, but Liverpool would lose so much credibility and the hiss taking will last until the end of time
There is a HUGE problem with all these calls for a replay. In February of this year, one goal was disallowed for the lines being drawn badly (Palace vs Brighton) and one given despite an offside )Arsenal vs Brentford). Neither game was replayed. What makes Liverpool more special than those other teams? I agree that incorrect offside calls are scandalous with VAR to help, but we can't have a new rule for one team.
comment by Custardeyes (U4500)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by 8==Divock - LFC High Reputation Board Member (U22339)
posted 43 minutes ago
G_B mate I’m sure these reta*ss are just on the WUM. Why are they bring up examples from games where VAR, GL tech & other laws applied?
At the end of the day the Premier Leagues own rules for this season state that the VAR was wilfully incorrectly implemented and therefore breached the threshold where a game COULD be replayed.
It’s not rocket science
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were incorrectly implemented 100%. Google willfully carrot boy.
It wasn't done willfully it was pure incompetence and panic. And within the rules of the game once the restart had occurred it couldn't be stopped. If it was then that would be a willfully incorrect implementation of the laws and Spurs could be entitled to a replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
Sign in if you want to comment
Replay 100% justified..as "I" said ages ago
Page 1 of 3
posted on 4/10/23
Actually feel for the innocent Liverpool fans who are getting dragged along with this cringefest created by Klopp
posted on 4/10/23
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 35 seconds ago
Actually feel for the innocent Liverpool fans who are getting dragged along with this cringefest created by Klopp
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell me what's wrong with what klopp has said?
posted on 4/10/23
innocent Liverpool fans
———
As if such a thing exists.
posted on 4/10/23
If Spurs were honourable!!! Give over man you’re totally delusional
posted on 4/10/23
Get over it, it's not happening.
posted on 4/10/23
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
posted on 4/10/23
How many articles are you going to write about this? You get the odd thing right in so many predictions, its like a 0.01% success rate. Do you really need to milk that 0.01% ?
posted on 4/10/23
The laws were incorrectly applied when Kieran Gibbs was sent off against Chelsea after an Oxlade Chanberlain handball. No replay, nor did Arsenal ask for one.
posted on 4/10/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 50 minutes ago
innocent Liverpool fans
———
As if such a thing exists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's like saying handsome Man UTD fans.
posted on 4/10/23
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 29 minutes ago
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently var was working for your game
posted on 4/10/23
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 31 minutes ago
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should have complained
posted on 4/10/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 31 minutes ago
What about when Bournemouth had a legit goal that was ruled out because goal line technology wasn't working. That goal could have been the difference between them getting relegated and not so far more costly. If you want to talk about unprecedented and the unfair implications then look no further than that. But they didn't get any replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should have complained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not Karen's.
posted on 4/10/23
Spurs should accept a replay if Liverpool accept starting with 9 men
posted on 4/10/23
How about the west ham Tevez and mascherano farce
If we wanna go back and rewrite history we’d have to go very far back
Personally I’m just waiting for this City financial doping decision to see what earthquakes this cause
posted on 4/10/23
G_B mate I’m sure these reta*ss are just on the WUM. Why are they bring up examples from games where VAR, GL tech & other laws applied?
At the end of the day the Premier Leagues own rules for this season state that the VAR was wilfully incorrectly implemented and therefore breached the threshold where a game COULD be replayed.
It’s not rocket science
posted on 4/10/23
Sconce*
posted on 4/10/23
The Honey monster has really got the salty Karen’s riled up. There won’t be a replay, get over it.
I’ve already accepted that the authorities won’t allow us to beat Liverpool for the next decade at least
posted on 4/10/23
comment by 8==Divock - LFC High Reputation Board Member (U22339)
posted 43 minutes ago
G_B mate I’m sure these reta*ss are just on the WUM. Why are they bring up examples from games where VAR, GL tech & other laws applied?
At the end of the day the Premier Leagues own rules for this season state that the VAR was wilfully incorrectly implemented and therefore breached the threshold where a game COULD be replayed.
It’s not rocket science
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were incorrectly implemented 100%. Google willfully carrot boy.
It wasn't done willfully it was pure incompetence and panic. And within the rules of the game once the restart had occurred it couldn't be stopped. If it was then that would be a willfully incorrect implementation of the laws and Spurs could be entitled to a replay.
posted on 4/10/23
Football fans are seemingly stupid individuals and dont understand the meaning of unprecedented. Its not a handball, foul. Its not subjective. Its offside onside black or white (since the technology)
posted on 4/10/23
posted on 4/10/23
Please please replay it, its a meaningless game, but Liverpool would lose so much credibility and the hiss taking will last until the end of time
posted on 4/10/23
Have you paid up yet GB?
posted on 4/10/23
Course he hasn’t
posted on 5/10/23
There is a HUGE problem with all these calls for a replay. In February of this year, one goal was disallowed for the lines being drawn badly (Palace vs Brighton) and one given despite an offside )Arsenal vs Brentford). Neither game was replayed. What makes Liverpool more special than those other teams? I agree that incorrect offside calls are scandalous with VAR to help, but we can't have a new rule for one team.
posted on 5/10/23
comment by Custardeyes (U4500)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by 8==Divock - LFC High Reputation Board Member (U22339)
posted 43 minutes ago
G_B mate I’m sure these reta*ss are just on the WUM. Why are they bring up examples from games where VAR, GL tech & other laws applied?
At the end of the day the Premier Leagues own rules for this season state that the VAR was wilfully incorrectly implemented and therefore breached the threshold where a game COULD be replayed.
It’s not rocket science
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were incorrectly implemented 100%. Google willfully carrot boy.
It wasn't done willfully it was pure incompetence and panic. And within the rules of the game once the restart had occurred it couldn't be stopped. If it was then that would be a willfully incorrect implementation of the laws and Spurs could be entitled to a replay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
Page 1 of 3