31% of posters on the United ja606 board over the last five years have been the same person with different usernames.
Cleverson the deranged buffoon has finally lost it I see 🤣🤣
OP doing RDDs work for him.
is it the % of shots on goal that Onana saves?
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
is it the % of shots on goal that Onana saves?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's 3.1%
The 31% is listed on the stock exchange. I own a few shares. If anyone wants to start buying that part up they can do
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 4 minutes ago
The 31% is listed on the stock exchange. I own a few shares. If anyone wants to start buying that part up they can do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any thoughts on why Ratcliffe wouldnt look to buy these shares?
Si is RDD Bibby Smalls today?
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 13 minutes ago
Si is RDD Bibby Smalls today?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Si Senor
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 13 minutes ago
Si is RDD Bibby Smalls today?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Si Senor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grassy Ass. Its good to know.
Seems nobody is able to contemplate it might not be the big bad Glazers holding any sale up.
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that absolutely nowhere is reporting that the silent 31% are refusing to sell should tell you all you need to know.
"The fact that absolutely nowhere is reporting that the silent 31% are refusing to sell should tell you all you need to know."
True.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that absolutely nowhere is reporting that the silent 31% are refusing to sell should tell you all you need to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because anything anti Glazer is lapped up. They know nothing about what's going on.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The board can't decide to sell 1 particular Investors shares
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
31%
Page 1 of 1
posted on 16/10/23
This will end well
posted on 16/10/23
31% of posters on the United ja606 board over the last five years have been the same person with different usernames.
posted on 16/10/23
Cleverson the deranged buffoon has finally lost it I see 🤣🤣
posted on 16/10/23
OP doing RDDs work for him.
posted on 16/10/23
Why was mine closed?
posted on 16/10/23
is it the % of shots on goal that Onana saves?
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
is it the % of shots on goal that Onana saves?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's 3.1%
posted on 16/10/23
The 31% is listed on the stock exchange. I own a few shares. If anyone wants to start buying that part up they can do
posted on 16/10/23
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 4 minutes ago
The 31% is listed on the stock exchange. I own a few shares. If anyone wants to start buying that part up they can do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any thoughts on why Ratcliffe wouldnt look to buy these shares?
posted on 16/10/23
Si is RDD Bibby Smalls today?
posted on 16/10/23
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 13 minutes ago
Si is RDD Bibby Smalls today?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Si Senor
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 13 minutes ago
Si is RDD Bibby Smalls today?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Si Senor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grassy Ass. Its good to know.
posted on 16/10/23
Seems nobody is able to contemplate it might not be the big bad Glazers holding any sale up.
posted on 16/10/23
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that absolutely nowhere is reporting that the silent 31% are refusing to sell should tell you all you need to know.
posted on 16/10/23
"The fact that absolutely nowhere is reporting that the silent 31% are refusing to sell should tell you all you need to know."
True.
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that absolutely nowhere is reporting that the silent 31% are refusing to sell should tell you all you need to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because anything anti Glazer is lapped up. They know nothing about what's going on.
posted on 16/10/23
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Bibby Smalls (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 43 minutes ago
Manchester United is 74.79% owned by retail investors and 25.21% by institutional shareholders.
My understanding is that voting rights are split by type of shares, and that's how Glazers hold the extra voting rights.
I'm unsure whose shares are being sold, but the "silent" 31%, you'd have to assume are the institutional shareholders.
However, usually in these situations, as the Glazers have ultimate voting rights I believe they've the power to force a full sale via a vote in the boardroom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in short, the silent 31% can't hold up the sale and it is the Glazers.
I mean, if it was any different then we would have heard about this via the press already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They can refuse to sell their shares.
If they do, the Glazers then have to decide if they wish to cash in, but in doing so, relinquish their controlling share (69% found to 44%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That isn't how the stock market works, if you own a share the board decide to sell, your shares are sold.
One of he main roles of the board of directors is to protect the interests of shareholders and stakeholders and that includes maximising value on any investment.
One of the first things investors will look at is the boards competency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The board can't decide to sell 1 particular Investors shares
Page 1 of 1