comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes aga... (U18355)
posted 25 minutes ago
Sacking her isn’t enough tbh. She should really be assassinated tbh. Or at least have her tongue and fingers removed so she can’t communicate with the rest of the world anymore
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do realise you could be charged for that post!
All the right wing nut jobs that she is after will be supporting Farage when he rejoins the Tory party. So she’ll be left with nothing.
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 49 minutes ago
A poll of 2,000 people in a country of 60 million doesn't mean she speaks for the majority at all.
Going by the comments on here, I doubt 5 per cent of the country either like or support her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The trouble is that the media message has already gone out that people marching in support of brown people is an insult to Britain's war dead.
Very few people have the ability to think critically. They don't stop to think hang on why exactly is it disrespectful to our war dead again? They just accept it. It's the people who have the power to think for themselves who go out and march, and that's what winds Braverman up, seeing 100s of 1000s of people marching against Israel and only a few dozens marching for Israel. She can't understand it and sulks about it like the spoiled brat she is.
She should be deported to Rwanda.
comment by Bill Nick (U23088)
posted 2 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 49 minutes ago
A poll of 2,000 people in a country of 60 million doesn't mean she speaks for the majority at all.
Going by the comments on here, I doubt 5 per cent of the country either like or support her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The trouble is that the media message has already gone out that people marching in support of brown people is an insult to Britain's war dead.
Very few people have the ability to think critically. They don't stop to think hang on why exactly is it disrespectful to our war dead again? They just accept it. It's the people who have the power to think for themselves who go out and march, and that's what winds Braverman up, seeing 100s of 1000s of people marching against Israel and only a few dozens marching for Israel. She can't understand it and sulks about it like the spoiled brat she is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way there are so many good Jewish Israelis and good people who have love for Israel, and I don't mean to criticise them at all, and I feel for them at this time too.
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely. Reading between the lines I saw that reference in her speech to police being much harsher on far right extremists as a call to arms.
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 14 minutes ago
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probs cos Israel will laugh and take even more land
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you honestly believe that then you are very naive.
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you honestly believe that then you are very naive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Add me to that list then.
On both the EDL and her prayers, whatever they are.
She only cares about herself so she wants to be proven correct.
Looks like her plan has worked and her call has been answered by Tommy Robinson:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/far-right-groups-palestine-march-london-b2445029.html
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 11 hours, 1 minute ago
She should be deported to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And take all the illegals with her
comment by Bill Nick (U23088)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
Looks like her plan has worked and her call has been answered by Tommy Robinson:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/far-right-groups-palestine-march-london-b2445029.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100 per cent that is her plan. Her mates are the Tommy Robinson`s of this world. She spouts hate, like he does at every turn. Farage, Robinson and some of her right wing looney MPs like Lee Anderson, Rees-Mogg etc are all racists. They just like to dress it up, they are representing normal people. They are not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nmj0JFGqE30
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 12 hours, 50 minutes ago
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point. I guess the immediate attention in regards the ongoing deaths is given to the direct current cause rather than a past chain of events. And in terms of the general history of mistreatment of Palestinians, Hamas is not the cause of that. But your point has some value imo, and perhaps it's something which the protestors might take into account to attract (even) wider support and detract from those who portray them ignorantly, dishonestly and provocatively as an evil mob which is contrary to British values.
And I think also I have used the words "against Israel" when really that should be against the Israeli extremist government by the way. I certainly don't wish ill to the people of Israel anyway, as I'm sure most others don't.
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 26 minutes ago
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a small group of right wing nutters going from my village " to defend the Cenotaph " and "the right to wear a poppy" - completly fabricated threats - the irony of protesting against an demonstration calling for an Armistice on Armistice day will be lost on them
comment by Nichoglou (U14419)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 26 minutes ago
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a small group of right wing nutters going from my village " to defend the Cenotaph " and "the right to wear a poppy" - completly fabricated threats - the irony of protesting against an demonstration calling for an Armistice on Armistice day will be lost on them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
exactly.
right wing extremists "defending" britain's war heroes against people marching for peace.
it defies belief.
They’re defending statues actually. Statues they won’t be able to get near because the police will be there.
comment by Bill Nick (U23088)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 12 hours, 50 minutes ago
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point. I guess the immediate attention in regards the ongoing deaths is given to the direct current cause rather than a past chain of events. And in terms of the general history of mistreatment of Palestinians, Hamas is not the cause of that. But your point has some value imo, and perhaps it's something which the protestors might take into account to attract (even) wider support and detract from those who portray them ignorantly, dishonestly and provocatively as an evil mob which is contrary to British values.
And I think also I have used the words "against Israel" when really that should be against the Israeli extremist government by the way. I certainly don't wish ill to the people of Israel anyway, as I'm sure most others don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have highlighted an important fact in this conflict. Neither Israel nor Palestine are possessed of governments which serve their respective interests best.
It should also be recognised that the 80 year old dispute between the two states will not be solved in the white heat of the current situation, where atrocious and deliberate barbarity was intentionally inflicted on Israeli civilians by Hamas, causing untold (but not unexpected) carnage on their own population by the IDF.
One problem at a time. What must be done is for Israel to vote in a more moderate administration and for Hamas to be taken out of the equation, so both states are represented by governments more focussed on finding a lasting two-state solution.
comment by Nichoglou (U14419)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 26 minutes ago
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a small group of right wing nutters going from my village " to defend the Cenotaph " and "the right to wear a poppy" - completly fabricated threats - the irony of protesting against an demonstration calling for an Armistice on Armistice day will be lost on them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
U shud moove ur village when they r away so they cannot fined it agane on there return
She’s completely wrong calling them hate marches, and as Home Secretary she shouldn’t be undermining the police. There definitely is some truth in what she said however, that the police go easier on some groups than others.
Sign in if you want to comment
Is Braverman completely out of control?
Page 3 of 4
posted on 9/11/23
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
posted on 9/11/23
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes aga... (U18355)
posted 25 minutes ago
Sacking her isn’t enough tbh. She should really be assassinated tbh. Or at least have her tongue and fingers removed so she can’t communicate with the rest of the world anymore
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do realise you could be charged for that post!
posted on 9/11/23
All the right wing nut jobs that she is after will be supporting Farage when he rejoins the Tory party. So she’ll be left with nothing.
posted on 9/11/23
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
posted on 9/11/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 49 minutes ago
A poll of 2,000 people in a country of 60 million doesn't mean she speaks for the majority at all.
Going by the comments on here, I doubt 5 per cent of the country either like or support her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The trouble is that the media message has already gone out that people marching in support of brown people is an insult to Britain's war dead.
Very few people have the ability to think critically. They don't stop to think hang on why exactly is it disrespectful to our war dead again? They just accept it. It's the people who have the power to think for themselves who go out and march, and that's what winds Braverman up, seeing 100s of 1000s of people marching against Israel and only a few dozens marching for Israel. She can't understand it and sulks about it like the spoiled brat she is.
posted on 9/11/23
She should be deported to Rwanda.
posted on 9/11/23
comment by Bill Nick (U23088)
posted 2 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 49 minutes ago
A poll of 2,000 people in a country of 60 million doesn't mean she speaks for the majority at all.
Going by the comments on here, I doubt 5 per cent of the country either like or support her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The trouble is that the media message has already gone out that people marching in support of brown people is an insult to Britain's war dead.
Very few people have the ability to think critically. They don't stop to think hang on why exactly is it disrespectful to our war dead again? They just accept it. It's the people who have the power to think for themselves who go out and march, and that's what winds Braverman up, seeing 100s of 1000s of people marching against Israel and only a few dozens marching for Israel. She can't understand it and sulks about it like the spoiled brat she is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 9/11/23
By the way there are so many good Jewish Israelis and good people who have love for Israel, and I don't mean to criticise them at all, and I feel for them at this time too.
posted on 9/11/23
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
posted on 9/11/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely. Reading between the lines I saw that reference in her speech to police being much harsher on far right extremists as a call to arms.
posted on 9/11/23
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 14 minutes ago
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probs cos Israel will laugh and take even more land
posted on 9/11/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you honestly believe that then you are very naive.
posted on 9/11/23
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 35 minutes ago
50% support her stance of banning the demonstrations, with 34% against, so it seems she speaks for the majority. Personally, I think they should be allowed; you can't ban demonstrations if they are peaceful or you are throwing away a basic right to free speech.
Interestingly, the most spineless and flip-flopping politician in history has just called Sunak spineless for not sacking her. Pot meets kettle?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The questions are: what’s the chances of the demonstration becoming violent?
What’s the chance they will disrupt the proceedings on the most solemn weekend in the U.K.?
If either of those things happen she will be vindicated.
Sunak has a very difficult decision to make. He won’t make it before Monday though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way a peaceful march will turn violent is if Bravermans foot soldiers, like the EDL or Football lads alliance turn up to cause confrontation. I suspect she is praying this will happen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you honestly believe that then you are very naive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Add me to that list then.
On both the EDL and her prayers, whatever they are.
She only cares about herself so she wants to be proven correct.
posted on 10/11/23
Looks like her plan has worked and her call has been answered by Tommy Robinson:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/far-right-groups-palestine-march-london-b2445029.html
posted on 10/11/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 11 hours, 1 minute ago
She should be deported to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And take all the illegals with her
posted on 10/11/23
comment by Bill Nick (U23088)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
Looks like her plan has worked and her call has been answered by Tommy Robinson:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/far-right-groups-palestine-march-london-b2445029.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100 per cent that is her plan. Her mates are the Tommy Robinson`s of this world. She spouts hate, like he does at every turn. Farage, Robinson and some of her right wing looney MPs like Lee Anderson, Rees-Mogg etc are all racists. They just like to dress it up, they are representing normal people. They are not.
posted on 10/11/23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nmj0JFGqE30
posted on 10/11/23
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 12 hours, 50 minutes ago
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point. I guess the immediate attention in regards the ongoing deaths is given to the direct current cause rather than a past chain of events. And in terms of the general history of mistreatment of Palestinians, Hamas is not the cause of that. But your point has some value imo, and perhaps it's something which the protestors might take into account to attract (even) wider support and detract from those who portray them ignorantly, dishonestly and provocatively as an evil mob which is contrary to British values.
And I think also I have used the words "against Israel" when really that should be against the Israeli extremist government by the way. I certainly don't wish ill to the people of Israel anyway, as I'm sure most others don't.
posted on 10/11/23
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
posted on 10/11/23
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 26 minutes ago
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a small group of right wing nutters going from my village " to defend the Cenotaph " and "the right to wear a poppy" - completly fabricated threats - the irony of protesting against an demonstration calling for an Armistice on Armistice day will be lost on them
posted on 10/11/23
comment by Nichoglou (U14419)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 26 minutes ago
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a small group of right wing nutters going from my village " to defend the Cenotaph " and "the right to wear a poppy" - completly fabricated threats - the irony of protesting against an demonstration calling for an Armistice on Armistice day will be lost on them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
exactly.
right wing extremists "defending" britain's war heroes against people marching for peace.
it defies belief.
posted on 10/11/23
They’re defending statues actually. Statues they won’t be able to get near because the police will be there.
posted on 10/11/23
comment by Bill Nick (U23088)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
comment by CromulentMart (U1286)
posted 12 hours, 50 minutes ago
How about demonstrating against Hamas but for Palestine?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point. I guess the immediate attention in regards the ongoing deaths is given to the direct current cause rather than a past chain of events. And in terms of the general history of mistreatment of Palestinians, Hamas is not the cause of that. But your point has some value imo, and perhaps it's something which the protestors might take into account to attract (even) wider support and detract from those who portray them ignorantly, dishonestly and provocatively as an evil mob which is contrary to British values.
And I think also I have used the words "against Israel" when really that should be against the Israeli extremist government by the way. I certainly don't wish ill to the people of Israel anyway, as I'm sure most others don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have highlighted an important fact in this conflict. Neither Israel nor Palestine are possessed of governments which serve their respective interests best.
It should also be recognised that the 80 year old dispute between the two states will not be solved in the white heat of the current situation, where atrocious and deliberate barbarity was intentionally inflicted on Israeli civilians by Hamas, causing untold (but not unexpected) carnage on their own population by the IDF.
One problem at a time. What must be done is for Israel to vote in a more moderate administration and for Hamas to be taken out of the equation, so both states are represented by governments more focussed on finding a lasting two-state solution.
posted on 10/11/23
comment by Nichoglou (U14419)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 26 minutes ago
The football firms are talking about joining allegiances in a counter "protest".
This will go well. We will get violence, she knows that. That's what happens when you get 100s of boozed, up, charlie snorting peanut brains running the government though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a small group of right wing nutters going from my village " to defend the Cenotaph " and "the right to wear a poppy" - completly fabricated threats - the irony of protesting against an demonstration calling for an Armistice on Armistice day will be lost on them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
U shud moove ur village when they r away so they cannot fined it agane on there return
posted on 10/11/23
She’s completely wrong calling them hate marches, and as Home Secretary she shouldn’t be undermining the police. There definitely is some truth in what she said however, that the police go easier on some groups than others.
Page 3 of 4