comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 33 minutes ago
wtf is this sheeet mambinator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? I genuinely love Dīck Turpin. Nothing wrong with that.

Or were you talking about the OP?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the OP

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 33 minutes ago
wtf is this sheeet mambinator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? I genuinely love Dīck Turpin. Nothing wrong with that.

Or were you talking about the OP?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the OP
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh that! Just interesting to hear thoughts of football fans on how wages correspond to their teams performance on the pitch. What do you think about United's?

comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 (U2462)
posted 3 hours, 41 minutes ago
Very much like yesterday's list on here I don't think many people will argue against it. Yes, United get really poor value for money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is not a wum. I didn't mischievously and blatantly leave out an entity which everyone will immediately notice is missing in order to wind up fans of that entity's club.

(1/2)
(1/2)

Oh that! Just interesting to hear thoughts of football fans on how wages correspond to their teams performance on the pitch. What do you think about United's?

…..

Ours has been really crap since Ed was put in charge. That has now ended. We won’t even make top four of this table next year.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 hours, 19 minutes ago
Oh that! Just interesting to hear thoughts of football fans on how wages correspond to their teams performance on the pitch. What do you think about United's?

…..

Ours has been really crap since Ed was put in charge. That has now ended. We won’t even make top four of this table next year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashame. Its the only table you had a sniff at top 4.

Gunners' total salaries stand at £234.7million per year

What is the source for this crap?

Btw that incudes all staff and directors.

Man City total salaries stand at £422.9m per year

Man Utd total salaries stand at £331m per year

Chelsea total salaries stand at £404m per year

Spurs total salaries stand at £251.1 m per year

Aston Villa total salaries stand at £194m per year

Liverpool total salaries stand at £373m per year

Thats the proper accounts btw and not some made up crap.

Jenius fair play, that gives a diffireng ant to it somewhat?

Still freaks me when I see those amounts if honest

"differing slant"

Yeah. They are large, but when you consider the revenue the clubs are generating? I think UEFA's 70% wage to revenue ratio will put a lot of clubs into trouble. Especially those not in the Champions League. Man Utd and Chelsea look particularly vulnerable.

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 56 minutes ago
Liverpool total salaries stand at £373m per year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's staff costs, not total salaries.

The article is about the wage bill, not total salaries(which includes the tea lady) or staff costs (which include the tea lady's medical insurance, travel allowance and sheet).

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 56 minutes ago
Liverpool total salaries stand at £373m per year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's staff costs, not total salaries.

The article is about the wage bill, not total salaries(which includes the tea lady) or staff costs (which include the tea lady's medical insurance, travel allowance and sheet).


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Do you think Liverpool pay the tea lady £10m a year or £20k a year?

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 56 minutes ago
Liverpool total salaries stand at £373m per year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's staff costs, not total salaries.

The article is about the wage bill, not total salaries(which includes the tea lady) or staff costs (which include the tea lady's medical insurance, travel allowance and sheet).


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Do you think Liverpool pay the tea lady £10m a year or £20k a year?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.

I've already explained why your figures are. Your figures have no beating on mine.

What is it exactly you think you've proven here?

*bearing

Don't you get it? Players salaries are never disclosed!

So your argument in the OP comes from a completely false premise!

Most top clubs have youth academies, coaches and staff that maintain and run stadia. So those costs are always similar between clubs.

The variation in the total salaries comes from wages paid to the players. And you can see from REAL figures that its:

1. Man City
2. Chelsea
3. Liverpool
4. Man Utd
5. Spurs
6. Arsenal
7. Aston Villa

So if you wanted to look at players who are overperforming? You have your list!

And UEFA look at total salaries for sanctions!

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 3 hours, 17 minutes ago

Don't you get it? Players salaries are never disclosed!
====
Yes they are, if you know where to look.

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 3 hours, 17 minutes ago

Don't you get it? Players salaries are never disclosed!
====
Yes they are, if you know where to look.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they are not. Never. Its only legal if the player or his agent does it otherwise its against all privacy rules.