wasnt it the Guardian who started this story that INEOS had decided Ten Hag was to be sacked after the game, despite the result?

comment by RB&W -Same Place-Same Club-Same Man (U21434)
posted 3 minutes ago
wasnt it the Guardian who started this story that INEOS had decided Ten Hag was to be sacked after the game, despite the result?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it was. But not this journalist.

Nonsense article, poor from the guardian. Anyone can see that we play at our best when countering against teams that attack

I liked it, I like this journalist.
If you agree with it why is it nonsense?

He’s wrong by saying that its daft to say that a serious football administration team like INEOs could not change their minds on their long-term, thought out, £B000s policy, based on the result of just one game. It would actually be mental to do that. FA Cup final or not. Which would involve not even factoring in the below par performance of the opposition. Which let's face it, it was from City with recent form for whatever reasons. (Not that I care, as a Manc I’m just glad we beat City specifically, won the FA Cup, and I was there in London to see it happen Happy Days!)

INEOS should stick to their guns as this same newspaper revealed was going to happen yesterday according to their reliable sources.

Apparently.

I don't think City were below par. I think we stopped them playing well

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think City were below par. I think we stopped them playing well

----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were below par. We all saw that for ourselves. Their par is usually best in the PLeague/World.

Which is why I said 'for whatever reason', and United stopping them, is a very good reason, why.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
I liked it, I like this journalist.
If you agree with it why is it nonsense?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because our identity isn’t a low black counter attacking team, and we can’t play like that each week because we can’t play teams that that sort tactics works against each week.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
I don't think City were below par. I think we stopped them playing well

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah they were rubbish that first half, if they'd had been on form you wouldn't have been able to stop them I don't think.

I think someone on here called it right when they said Pep got in his own head with sentiment and played a team that didn't really make sense.

They weren't on form because we didn't let them be on form.