comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
We don't want ETH sacked because he may well be.
Three finals, two won.
Genuine reasons for poor league, mega injury list.
The loss of two attackers Greenwood and Sancho.
And no the injuries aren't at his door. First off he doesn't rush anyone back, he's the best we have had, ask the others.
Show the reports of the training being too intense, I read three papers and the Athletic and haven't read it
I don't think he's perfect, but I do think he is good and serious. I think he will be better next year.
Arrogant,I don't think so, but you certainly are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The genuine reasons for our terrible league performances are all down to him. As are the injuries. Look it up mate, he's too intense and as a result we've have more injuries than A+E on a Saturday night.
How am I arrogant? Thought we got on well?? Maybe not eh 52. Used to like hearing your reviews of wine etc but maybe we have to fall out because of our inept manager.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't find anything about the training being too intense.
We disagree on ETH which is fair enough, it's why we come on hear, to post our opinion.
Normally I have no axe to grind about your posts.
But the little threat about you were raging and if he doesn't get sacked there would be consequences sounded like a threat to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan Giggs in the 99 Documentary: "The training was harder than the games [under Sir Alex], it was just the dynamic of the team. It was a tough environment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Football different back then.
Ten Haag has to go
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was and still is a terrible side IMO. Though a few seeds seem to be flowering. Bringing through Mainoo, Garnacho and hopefully Amad going forward is not to be forgotten
comment by House (U17162)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was and still is a terrible side IMO. Though a few seeds seem to be flowering. Bringing through Mainoo, Garnacho and hopefully Amad going forward is not to be forgotten
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ten Hag took over a team which had:
De Gea- Top class GK
Varane- Top class CB
Maguire- Very good CB
Shaw- Top class LB
Bruno- World class CM
Fred- Decent CM
McTominay- Decent CM
Rashford- Top class LWF
Garnacho- Potentially world class RWF
Sancho- Potentially world class RWF
In it. How was it this terrible side people make out?
No excuses at all he has to go.
Also, Garnacho had already made his debut for us the year before. Yet another myth about ETH because he didn't discover him at all.
Ten Hag out.
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
You mention Amad to defend your hero, yet Ole signed him and gave him his debut.
What next? If we bring Greenwood back, you'll praise him for discovering him too???
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please provide the quote where I said this. Otherwise I might filter you for trying to derail my threat.
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please provide the quote where I said this. Otherwise I might filter you for trying to derail my threat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance you have the same article and same posts 10k times over would take me a lifetime to find it.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside." I will post this just from the last thread you created Culer.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside."
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please provide the quote where I said this. Otherwise I might filter you for trying to derail my threat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance you have the same article and same posts 10k times over would take me a lifetime to find it.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside." I will post this just from the last thread you created Culer.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn’t say we’d win the title though does it or that he’d be the best in the world
comment by (U23173)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your question has no relevance because the LFC side Klopp took over was a shocking side.
Ten Hag took over a team that had world class players in it, that had pushed City for the title and finished second.
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your question has no relevance because the LFC side Klopp took over was a shocking side.
Ten Hag took over a team that had world class players in it, that had pushed City for the title and finished second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has every relevance to your OP. Was 4 seasons before Klopp won anything. Amazing what sticking with a manager can do. You also stated earlier that Jose should have been given a 5 year contract. None of your arguments back up your assertion that a ''revolving door' policy is the right policy. Your opinions are tainted by hatred for EtH - and the fact that you have ALWAYS to be right and you have no respect for any other opinions.
ten Hag in....for many years to come.
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
comment by (U23173)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your question has no relevance because the LFC side Klopp took over was a shocking side.
Ten Hag took over a team that had world class players in it, that had pushed City for the title and finished second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has every relevance to your OP. Was 4 seasons before Klopp won anything. Amazing what sticking with a manager can do. You also stated earlier that Jose should have been given a 5 year contract. None of your arguments back up your assertion that a ''revolving door' policy is the right policy. Your opinions are tainted by hatred for EtH - and the fact that you have ALWAYS to be right and you have no respect for any other opinions.
ten Hag in....for many years to come.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The comment on Jose is clearly satire.
As for Klopp, you could see a clear identity football wise and progress under him. Not to mention his elite CV and titles in Germany.
Not applicable to Ten Hag in anyway shape or form. We aren’t going forwards whatsoever we’re going backwards. Swansea won the League Cup and Wigan won the FA Cup in 12/13.
I suppose in those two seasons they were two of the best sides in Europe were they?
Ten Hag out
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you interested in reading what I wrote and not responding to a completely different point?
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
comment by (U23173)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Culer / Robb is a bit thick.
comment by (U23173)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, just when you thought the thread was running out of steam….. here comes Stupidson! 😂😂
comment by (U23173)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were winning trophies under Jose.
You don’t half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
Sign in if you want to comment
Revolving Door Policy Needed @ Man United
Page 2 of 4
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
We don't want ETH sacked because he may well be.
Three finals, two won.
Genuine reasons for poor league, mega injury list.
The loss of two attackers Greenwood and Sancho.
And no the injuries aren't at his door. First off he doesn't rush anyone back, he's the best we have had, ask the others.
Show the reports of the training being too intense, I read three papers and the Athletic and haven't read it
I don't think he's perfect, but I do think he is good and serious. I think he will be better next year.
Arrogant,I don't think so, but you certainly are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The genuine reasons for our terrible league performances are all down to him. As are the injuries. Look it up mate, he's too intense and as a result we've have more injuries than A+E on a Saturday night.
How am I arrogant? Thought we got on well?? Maybe not eh 52. Used to like hearing your reviews of wine etc but maybe we have to fall out because of our inept manager.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't find anything about the training being too intense.
We disagree on ETH which is fair enough, it's why we come on hear, to post our opinion.
Normally I have no axe to grind about your posts.
But the little threat about you were raging and if he doesn't get sacked there would be consequences sounded like a threat to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan Giggs in the 99 Documentary: "The training was harder than the games [under Sir Alex], it was just the dynamic of the team. It was a tough environment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Football different back then.
Ten Haag has to go
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was and still is a terrible side IMO. Though a few seeds seem to be flowering. Bringing through Mainoo, Garnacho and hopefully Amad going forward is not to be forgotten
posted on 29/5/24
comment by House (U17162)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was and still is a terrible side IMO. Though a few seeds seem to be flowering. Bringing through Mainoo, Garnacho and hopefully Amad going forward is not to be forgotten
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ten Hag took over a team which had:
De Gea- Top class GK
Varane- Top class CB
Maguire- Very good CB
Shaw- Top class LB
Bruno- World class CM
Fred- Decent CM
McTominay- Decent CM
Rashford- Top class LWF
Garnacho- Potentially world class RWF
Sancho- Potentially world class RWF
In it. How was it this terrible side people make out?
No excuses at all he has to go.
Also, Garnacho had already made his debut for us the year before. Yet another myth about ETH because he didn't discover him at all.
Ten Hag out.
posted on 29/5/24
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
posted on 29/5/24
You mention Amad to defend your hero, yet Ole signed him and gave him his debut.
What next? If we bring Greenwood back, you'll praise him for discovering him too???
posted on 29/5/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please provide the quote where I said this. Otherwise I might filter you for trying to derail my threat.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please provide the quote where I said this. Otherwise I might filter you for trying to derail my threat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance you have the same article and same posts 10k times over would take me a lifetime to find it.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside." I will post this just from the last thread you created Culer.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside."
posted on 29/5/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
All ETH has to do according to the OP is play Anthony in the no10.
He is one of the best if not THE best no10 in the world. And would be the difference in 8th and winning the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please provide the quote where I said this. Otherwise I might filter you for trying to derail my threat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance you have the same article and same posts 10k times over would take me a lifetime to find it.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside." I will post this just from the last thread you created Culer.
"I am confident that Poch, Zidane or Tuchel will see that Antony could be a top level number 10 and move him inside."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn’t say we’d win the title though does it or that he’d be the best in the world
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your question has no relevance because the LFC side Klopp took over was a shocking side.
Ten Hag took over a team that had world class players in it, that had pushed City for the title and finished second.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your question has no relevance because the LFC side Klopp took over was a shocking side.
Ten Hag took over a team that had world class players in it, that had pushed City for the title and finished second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has every relevance to your OP. Was 4 seasons before Klopp won anything. Amazing what sticking with a manager can do. You also stated earlier that Jose should have been given a 5 year contract. None of your arguments back up your assertion that a ''revolving door' policy is the right policy. Your opinions are tainted by hatred for EtH - and the fact that you have ALWAYS to be right and you have no respect for any other opinions.
ten Hag in....for many years to come.
posted on 29/5/24
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by (U23173)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
"Chelsea, Real Madrid, Man City and even Liverpool (with Dalglish) have ruthlessly sacked manager after manager over the years and yet, would you believe it, they maintained successes"
Liverpools only success was under Klopp who they stuck with after a bad first season, and a bad season in the middle.
Man City's haven't been that ruthless, they're also well run from the top down.
Chelsea's are a laughing stock.
Madrid are in a 2 team division.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool appointed Souness. He won the FA Cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Roy Evans. He won the league cup, just like ETH by the way, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Houllier. He won numerous trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Benitez. He won a UCL and a few other trophies, he wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Hodgson. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Dalglish. He won the League Cup, just like Ten Hag by the way, as well as making an FA Cup final. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool appointed Rodgers. He wasn't good enough and they sacked him.
Liverpool then appointed Klopp and won everything you can win.
See the trend here pal??? Sack and sack and sack until you get the right man.
Man City sacked a Premier League winning manager because Pep was available ffs.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp didn't win everything in his first 2 years. ten Hag has probably won more in his first 2 years than Klopp. You are trying too hard to be dogmatic and failing miserably. If your argument is that a revolving door policy is the best model, Klopp wouldn't have lasted long enough to win everything. Completely contradicts your OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because Klopp had an elite CV and took over a terrible side. He also implemented a style of play within about 2 games and you could see clear progress.
None of that applies to Ten Hag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EtH took over a terrible side. The job would not have been available if he was taking over a good/successful side. You are always right - how long did it take him to win his first trophy. What did he win in his first 2 years??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didn’t take over a terrible side.
We’d finished second a year earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems you always dodge questions that you don't like to answer. How long did it take Klopp win his first trophy, and how many trophies did he win in his first 2 seasons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you answer this question, please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your question has no relevance because the LFC side Klopp took over was a shocking side.
Ten Hag took over a team that had world class players in it, that had pushed City for the title and finished second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has every relevance to your OP. Was 4 seasons before Klopp won anything. Amazing what sticking with a manager can do. You also stated earlier that Jose should have been given a 5 year contract. None of your arguments back up your assertion that a ''revolving door' policy is the right policy. Your opinions are tainted by hatred for EtH - and the fact that you have ALWAYS to be right and you have no respect for any other opinions.
ten Hag in....for many years to come.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The comment on Jose is clearly satire.
As for Klopp, you could see a clear identity football wise and progress under him. Not to mention his elite CV and titles in Germany.
Not applicable to Ten Hag in anyway shape or form. We aren’t going forwards whatsoever we’re going backwards. Swansea won the League Cup and Wigan won the FA Cup in 12/13.
I suppose in those two seasons they were two of the best sides in Europe were they?
Ten Hag out
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you interested in reading what I wrote and not responding to a completely different point?
posted on 29/5/24
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Culer / Robb is a bit thick.
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 29/5/24
Oh, just when you thought the thread was running out of steam….. here comes Stupidson! 😂😂
posted on 29/5/24
comment by (U23173)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Pierrepoint Strangeways: Ten Hag Out (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
OP, I’ve not seen anyone say that.
I think the point is the question what value there is in lurching from one manager to another, when clearly there are problems at the club that a manager alone can’t fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not interested in ‘United’s principles mean we don’t hire and fire for the sake of it’
I’m interested in winning trophies.
Ten Hag out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are winning trophies. You don't half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were winning trophies under Jose.
You don’t half trip yourself up with almost every comment you make.
Page 2 of 4