I'm all for talented players being brought in, but surely we need a superstar attacker in the squad?

Sesko looks good, but I imagine it'll take a year or two to really see him at his best.

He's not the best finisher

Will be jealous if you get him, looks like a striker made for the PL.

He’ll be Rashford’s understudy

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 50 minutes ago
I'm all for talented players being brought in, but surely we need a superstar attacker in the squad?

Sesko looks good, but I imagine it'll take a year or two to really see him at his best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only striker I would pay more than £80M for is Isak and Newcastle won't let him go for less than £120M and that's not worth it due to his injury record, all the others are a big risk

string bean looking b 1tch

I liked what I initially saw in the Euros, think it was the Euros, a couple of years ago before he moved to Leipzig. I’m obviously needed to see more but you could tell them that he fvcking loves it.

He’s got a great skill set, and if Arteta can refine him a bit you’ll have a player I reckon. Not many like him about.

Thought all the talk is about Zirkzee?

comment by (K̇ash) - Klopp's Last Dance - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
He's not the best finisher
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shot conversion rate last season:
Sesko - 33.33%
Kane - 33.03%
Haaland - 27.55%
Nunez - 12.64%

😂

Spoonez

comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Klopp's Last Dance - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
He's not the best finisher
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shot conversion rate last season:
Sesko - 33.33%
Kane - 33.03%
Haaland - 27.55%
Nunez - 12.64%


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hell of a backfire 😆

Anyone seen him play? He’s got a nice name for starters!

comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 41 minutes ago
Thought all the talk is about Zirkzee?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Zirkzee reminds me of a taller version of Jesus from what I've seen

He looks good and at the prices being quoted, seems to be worth it.

Would be interested to see the salary deal he’s on.

You never really know how a player will adapt, of course, but seems a sensible move.

How much more are you going to spend

Money spent on transfers since Arteta’s arrival:

Chelsea - €1.44bn
Man U - €748.38m
City - €729.9m
Spurs - €690.9m
Arsenal - €682.74m
Liverpool - €493.85m

[@Transfermarkt]

Billy thinks Spurs have a Burnley level budget.

A lot of people do tbh. There's lots of myths surrounding spurs' spending.

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 28 seconds ago
A lot of people do tbh. There's lots of myths surrounding spurs' spending.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This.

Indeed. You don’t spend £60m on Richarlison and play pauper.

Arsenal had it under Wenger's last few years. He spent a lot of money and everyone who wasn't paying attention insisted the Kroenkes weren't allowing him to spend. They were spending, just on crap. Similar to spurs now.

But now arsenal are doing better, people are trying to make out we're Abramoviching the league or something

There’s not a lot of myths around Spurs’ spending, there’s just some uneducated people who don’t understand that expenditure doesn’t stop with transfer fees.

Wages is a huge, huge part of a club’s ability to compete, and Spurs simply don’t have the wage bill to compete.

That said, none of this is a dig at Arsenal.

Arteta is doing very well with his budget and putting clubs like United and Chelsea to shame.

Few people here being made to look very silly, good work with the receipts

Not much fun making Billy look silly