comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 13 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that's the subsidiary they set up.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 13 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that's the subsidiary they set up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was it INEOS or Ratcliffe?
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was it INEOS or Ratcliffe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was ineos but apparently not
Jim said from the get-go that INEOS wouldnt be investing in or involved in the running of Man United.
And it wont be.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 6 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 28 seconds ago
"Arthur Albiston"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely interested as to what it is you are laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite. I know Arthur and his family, he was a very good player.
I was thrown by him including Jimmy Nicholl in his list. Jimmy Nicholl played his entire career at United impersonating a headless chicken. To recall him over the likes of Pancho Pearson, Gordon Hill, Stevie Coppell and Martin Buchan makes me think that he must have been a bit of a gimp
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 34 minutes ago
Jim said from the get-go that INEOS wouldnt be investing in or involved in the running of Man United.
And it wont be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from INEOS employees Brailsford and the French fella.
Sign in if you want to comment
Ashworth addresses the fans
Page 2 of 2
posted on 23/7/24
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 13 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that's the subsidiary they set up.
posted on 23/7/24
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 13 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that's the subsidiary they set up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 23/7/24
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was it INEOS or Ratcliffe?
posted on 23/7/24
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Off topic a bit but I thought INEOS was the company who invested in United, but I keep seeing “Trawlers limited” as the company involved,
Still says Ratcliffe mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was it INEOS or Ratcliffe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was ineos but apparently not
posted on 23/7/24
Jim said from the get-go that INEOS wouldnt be investing in or involved in the running of Man United.
And it wont be.
posted on 23/7/24
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 6 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 28 seconds ago
"Arthur Albiston"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely interested as to what it is you are laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite. I know Arthur and his family, he was a very good player.
posted on 23/7/24
I was thrown by him including Jimmy Nicholl in his list. Jimmy Nicholl played his entire career at United impersonating a headless chicken. To recall him over the likes of Pancho Pearson, Gordon Hill, Stevie Coppell and Martin Buchan makes me think that he must have been a bit of a gimp
posted on 23/7/24
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 34 minutes ago
Jim said from the get-go that INEOS wouldnt be investing in or involved in the running of Man United.
And it wont be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from INEOS employees Brailsford and the French fella.
Page 2 of 2