posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
I don't see it happening, but we'd need money too, in such a deal.
I do think he's a good player though. Sadly, I also see Sancho going on to be very good.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Sancho when you sack Ten Haag could be an asset.
Sterling is more washed than Rashford.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
F-ck that.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
No thanks.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Noooooooo
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
The Chelsea squad is so big, I don't even know who they have got, but would rather look at one of their up and coming players. We don't need CBs now, but would rather we went for Chalobah in a swap deal rather than De Ligt tbh.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
He's better than Sancho but no.
The player I'd take from them (who they realistically might offer) is Chukwuemeka.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Exactly the type of player we should be avoiding
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Perhaps we should be asking for players like Colwill, Chukwuemeka, Lavia etc. They may be just daft enough to bite.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
united signing another left winger who can sort of play on the right a bit is it
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
No. City knew what they were doing when they sold him.
Far better than any of our current attackers at his peak but has been in decline for 2-3 years now.
I doubt our new people in charge of transfers would be so foolish.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
United need protecting from themselves.. ETH has signed some utter dross and this would be more of the same.
Having got RVN sitting there on the bench... just give him the job and move forward.... Feels like united are just killing time.
As much as I would love Spurs to win a cup (as United have done) surely it's not enough to gloss over the crap that has been United for a couple of years ??
Sterling might only be 29 (Feels like he's been around for forever) but his best years are behind him) As proved by his time at Chelsea... he looks a much better player than he is when he's surrounded by superstars
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Would be a rare example of a transfer that benefits neither team
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Do United fans think its only a matter of time before RVN gets the job or do you really believe ETH is the guy ?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 26 minutes ago
Do United fans think its only a matter of time before RVN gets the job or do you really believe ETH is the guy ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would RVN get the job?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
He's better than Sancho but no.
The player I'd take from them (who they realistically might offer) is Chukwuemeka.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Diamondlights
1. ETH isn't in charge of transfers
2. ETH has a lot to prove as a coach this season but there's nothing to suggest RVN is qualified to take over. His stint at PSV was pretty unsuccessful.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Take Mudryk
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
I’d rather we just gave them Sancho.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted 18 minutes ago
Take Mudryk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d sooner re-sign Elanga.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
He's better than Sancho but no.
The player I'd take from them (who they realistically might offer) is Chukwuemeka.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not keen on him due to the reported off field activities. From what I’ve heard, he drinks a whisky drink he drinks a vodka drink, he drinks a lager drink he drinks a cider drink and sings songs about the good times. .
Is that the sort of player we’d want?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Don't want him anywhere near this club.
I'd prefer Sancho went and we got nobody than sign yet another player on huge wages who isn't good enough.
INEOS have done a lot more right than wrong so far......this would be a huge red flag.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Is this simply a rumour because the media want it to be and have nothing else to report on?
I would love it if Chelsea took Sancho off our hands, but considering they need an out and out striker, not sure why they would bother.
It's bad enough with Rashford and Antony here, without having a past it Stirling - it reminds me of us signing Sanchez based on past glories. We need a CM, ideally 2. End of.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Although the only mildly amusing thing is that I can't think of many players that would have played for Utd, City and Liverpool??!!
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
If he wasn’t on such stupid wages I would. We need more goal scorers in the squad.
Sign in if you want to comment
Sancho for Sterling
Page 1 of 2
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
I don't see it happening, but we'd need money too, in such a deal.
I do think he's a good player though. Sadly, I also see Sancho going on to be very good.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Sancho when you sack Ten Haag could be an asset.
Sterling is more washed than Rashford.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
F-ck that.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
No thanks.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Noooooooo
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
The Chelsea squad is so big, I don't even know who they have got, but would rather look at one of their up and coming players. We don't need CBs now, but would rather we went for Chalobah in a swap deal rather than De Ligt tbh.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
He's better than Sancho but no.
The player I'd take from them (who they realistically might offer) is Chukwuemeka.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Exactly the type of player we should be avoiding
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Perhaps we should be asking for players like Colwill, Chukwuemeka, Lavia etc. They may be just daft enough to bite.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
united signing another left winger who can sort of play on the right a bit is it
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
No. City knew what they were doing when they sold him.
Far better than any of our current attackers at his peak but has been in decline for 2-3 years now.
I doubt our new people in charge of transfers would be so foolish.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
United need protecting from themselves.. ETH has signed some utter dross and this would be more of the same.
Having got RVN sitting there on the bench... just give him the job and move forward.... Feels like united are just killing time.
As much as I would love Spurs to win a cup (as United have done) surely it's not enough to gloss over the crap that has been United for a couple of years ??
Sterling might only be 29 (Feels like he's been around for forever) but his best years are behind him) As proved by his time at Chelsea... he looks a much better player than he is when he's surrounded by superstars
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Would be a rare example of a transfer that benefits neither team
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Do United fans think its only a matter of time before RVN gets the job or do you really believe ETH is the guy ?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 26 minutes ago
Do United fans think its only a matter of time before RVN gets the job or do you really believe ETH is the guy ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would RVN get the job?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
He's better than Sancho but no.
The player I'd take from them (who they realistically might offer) is Chukwuemeka.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Diamondlights
1. ETH isn't in charge of transfers
2. ETH has a lot to prove as a coach this season but there's nothing to suggest RVN is qualified to take over. His stint at PSV was pretty unsuccessful.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Take Mudryk
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
I’d rather we just gave them Sancho.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted 18 minutes ago
Take Mudryk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d sooner re-sign Elanga.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
He's better than Sancho but no.
The player I'd take from them (who they realistically might offer) is Chukwuemeka.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not keen on him due to the reported off field activities. From what I’ve heard, he drinks a whisky drink he drinks a vodka drink, he drinks a lager drink he drinks a cider drink and sings songs about the good times. .
Is that the sort of player we’d want?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Don't want him anywhere near this club.
I'd prefer Sancho went and we got nobody than sign yet another player on huge wages who isn't good enough.
INEOS have done a lot more right than wrong so far......this would be a huge red flag.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Is this simply a rumour because the media want it to be and have nothing else to report on?
I would love it if Chelsea took Sancho off our hands, but considering they need an out and out striker, not sure why they would bother.
It's bad enough with Rashford and Antony here, without having a past it Stirling - it reminds me of us signing Sanchez based on past glories. We need a CM, ideally 2. End of.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Although the only mildly amusing thing is that I can't think of many players that would have played for Utd, City and Liverpool??!!
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
If he wasn’t on such stupid wages I would. We need more goal scorers in the squad.
Page 1 of 2