It seems low risk high potential reward at that price.
Dbo why ud have us over arsenal tho, arsenal have spent more yet again and finished above us two years in a row and have a more settled side and manager etc.
Wonder who is nonce is then?
comment by KLS - Mick Lynch for prime minister (U1695)
posted 46 minutes ago
Wonder who is nonce is then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm going for Sandy. Definitely not an Arsenal fan.
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by KLS - Mick Lynch for prime minister (U1695)
posted 46 minutes ago
Wonder who is nonce is then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm going for Sandy. Definitely not an Arsenal fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s great business but as pointed out by everyone here, the OP is a bell.
Seems like Liverpool have boosted the attack, when they needed to strengthen in defence.
Arsenal have boosted the defence, when we needed to strengthen in attack.
And that's why city will win the league again. Ffs.
Really good business by Liverpool. Low risk at this price and still only 26 years old. If Liverpool manage to keep him fit he could be a good asset to add to their firepower. For me Liverpool has the best strike force in the league.
When you think Diouf and Heskey cost more, and Chiesa played over 30 league games last season, and was 3rd in the league for dribble success. ....yeah a steal.
Even if he doesn't perform that's almost free to a PL club. Burger and pie money 😂😂😂
Fact klopp wanted him for 70m plus a few seasons back shows the club has recognised his skillet for some time but understandably was cautious with his ACL injury. Used correctly he should be mad value, if he can get on the pitch.
I am also under no illusions that FSG signed it off cos Barca couldn't get a deal together and there was an opportunity to get a potential bargain. Also lucky Juve's new boss doesn't want him and with his wages, and just a year left on his deal, we're happy to get him out at any cost. He is still rapid and if he stays fit he won't be just making up the numbers.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Chiesa for 12m
Page 1 of 1
posted on 28/8/24
It seems low risk high potential reward at that price.
Dbo why ud have us over arsenal tho, arsenal have spent more yet again and finished above us two years in a row and have a more settled side and manager etc.
posted on 28/8/24
Wonder who is nonce is then?
posted on 28/8/24
comment by KLS - Mick Lynch for prime minister (U1695)
posted 46 minutes ago
Wonder who is nonce is then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm going for Sandy. Definitely not an Arsenal fan.
posted on 28/8/24
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by KLS - Mick Lynch for prime minister (U1695)
posted 46 minutes ago
Wonder who is nonce is then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm going for Sandy. Definitely not an Arsenal fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 28/8/24
It’s great business but as pointed out by everyone here, the OP is a bell.
posted on 28/8/24
Seems like Liverpool have boosted the attack, when they needed to strengthen in defence.
Arsenal have boosted the defence, when we needed to strengthen in attack.
And that's why city will win the league again. Ffs.
posted on 29/8/24
Really good business by Liverpool. Low risk at this price and still only 26 years old. If Liverpool manage to keep him fit he could be a good asset to add to their firepower. For me Liverpool has the best strike force in the league.
posted on 29/8/24
When you think Diouf and Heskey cost more, and Chiesa played over 30 league games last season, and was 3rd in the league for dribble success. ....yeah a steal.
Even if he doesn't perform that's almost free to a PL club. Burger and pie money 😂😂😂
Fact klopp wanted him for 70m plus a few seasons back shows the club has recognised his skillet for some time but understandably was cautious with his ACL injury. Used correctly he should be mad value, if he can get on the pitch.
I am also under no illusions that FSG signed it off cos Barca couldn't get a deal together and there was an opportunity to get a potential bargain. Also lucky Juve's new boss doesn't want him and with his wages, and just a year left on his deal, we're happy to get him out at any cost. He is still rapid and if he stays fit he won't be just making up the numbers.
Page 1 of 1