ooooooooooooooo, it;'s close.
i reckon kent's doing the transfers and stuff
that's cheating
i did actually do 1 transfer
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
No way on God's green Earth would he get done for rape.
======================
is there something we ought to know galv ?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Mike's gonna have to put a PG rating on today's episode.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
if you don't want to discuss the point then im not bothered.
I was just saying.
If she's only 15 then that's a whole new legal mine field
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Where did all this rape talk come from anyway
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Respond to my point in a gentlemanly fashion
======================
I already have done 4 times.
I wasn't talking about the evidentiary requirements.
I was comparing the law in one situation to the law in another situation.
The point that I made (in a conversation about rape which was already taking place prior to my contributions), was that I think it is odd that the law considers that a rape has occurred if intercourse continues after a woman has withdrawn her consent, but does not consider that a rape has occurred if a woman was duped into a sexual encounter on false pretences.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Where did all this rape talk come from anyway
=======================
not me
I had spent much of the day protesting about sexual comments on the thread, but eventually joined in in an attempt to put the comments into a constructive context.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I agreed with that 3 hours ago....
==========================
where ?
<stepsawayfromtherapediscussionandexitsstageleft>
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by ● (U4443)
posted 2 hours, 43 minutes ago
I thought you'd instructed your missus' mate to get your missus drunk so that you could have semi-consentual blunderings?
======================
ok, so looking back, tbf it was only one comment that I picked up on.
the conversation had been pretty dire all day though, with people making all manner of crude references.
at least I made a sensible point rather than just posting crude innuendo and crude comments, just for the sake of it.
Sign in if you want to comment
Good News
Page 7100 of 43137
7101 | 7102 | 7103 | 7104 | 7105
posted on 19/2/13
ooooooooooooooo, it;'s close.
i reckon kent's doing the transfers and stuff
that's cheating
posted on 19/2/13
i did actually do 1 transfer
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
No way on God's green Earth would he get done for rape.
======================
is there something we ought to know galv ?
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Mike's gonna have to put a PG rating on today's episode.
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
if you don't want to discuss the point then im not bothered.
I was just saying.
posted on 19/2/13
If she's only 15 then that's a whole new legal mine field
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Where did all this rape talk come from anyway
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Respond to my point in a gentlemanly fashion
======================
I already have done 4 times.
I wasn't talking about the evidentiary requirements.
I was comparing the law in one situation to the law in another situation.
The point that I made (in a conversation about rape which was already taking place prior to my contributions), was that I think it is odd that the law considers that a rape has occurred if intercourse continues after a woman has withdrawn her consent, but does not consider that a rape has occurred if a woman was duped into a sexual encounter on false pretences.
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Where did all this rape talk come from anyway
=======================
not me
I had spent much of the day protesting about sexual comments on the thread, but eventually joined in in an attempt to put the comments into a constructive context.
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
I agreed with that 3 hours ago....
==========================
where ?
posted on 19/2/13
<stepsawayfromtherapediscussionandexitsstageleft>
posted on 19/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/13
comment by ● (U4443)
posted 2 hours, 43 minutes ago
I thought you'd instructed your missus' mate to get your missus drunk so that you could have semi-consentual blunderings?
======================
ok, so looking back, tbf it was only one comment that I picked up on.
the conversation had been pretty dire all day though, with people making all manner of crude references.
at least I made a sensible point rather than just posting crude innuendo and crude comments, just for the sake of it.
Page 7100 of 43137
7101 | 7102 | 7103 | 7104 | 7105