The point is that people can use players that they never would get the chance to otherwise.
You could borrow Ibra from someone for a couple of weeks
Plus, if you have a player in your club which you're not using, you could make money with him, without having to actually sell him.
Nah. Players come and go too quickly. You'd have to at least set the loan to number of games rather than number of days
That video is ridiculous. Also some of the people he's playing against are terrible.
I can see the appeal of the loan system but not sure it would work. Couldn't see me paying for a loan of the big players as it just wouldn't be worth it.
I can see the problem with that being someone borrowing a load of players, but not actually using them, just to annoy the people who actually own them.
It could be worth it. Say you bought a La Liga squad, but only wanted to use it for one week. Getting Ronaldo on loan for that one week for 100k for example, would surely be a good deal, wouldn't it?
The people with good players won't want to loan them out. They'll either want to keep them or sell them. Although I think it'd be a bit too exploit-y if you just listed them for loan again and again so you wouldn't actually get much money for it as people would just end up buying anyway?
I think it would be used by people who aren't using a player, but don't want to get rid of him because they're planning on using him again. By loaning him out, he doesn't just gather dust in his club, but he actually makes him money. Its also a good deal for the people taking the player on loan as they probably won't have the money to buy the player for his full price. You could also use the loan to maybe test out a player to see if he's actually worth saving up for, if you can't afford him then, but could trade up to him.
It would be abused so heavily.
Say you got Ronaldo in a pack and loaned him out for 100k. After 10 weeks or whatever of loaning him out you could buy another Ronaldo and keep loaning your existing one out. That way in another 10 weeks you could buy Messi. And so on and so on. That's what I'd do anyway.
Yeah. Ivan u mug stop abusing the system u total cretin
True, I see that problem now.
Damn. Its a nice idea in theory though
fookin hell ivan i didnt mean it you madman
I wouldn't dare me to abuse you again.
It'll be much worse next time.
I would like to do a Eredivisie/Dutch team at some point but the defence is poor.
I would. I'm moderately enthusiastic about it.
-----------------------Steekelenberg-------------------
Van der Wiel--Heitinga--Douglas--van Aarnholt
----------Sneijder---IF De Jong---IF Eriksen----
------Robben---------van Persie------IF Mertens
Mertens might only have 7 chem though.
Sign in if you want to comment
FIFA Ultimate team
Page 1384 of 1754
1385 | 1386 | 1387 | 1388 | 1389
posted on 15/1/13
No point.
posted on 15/1/13
The point is that people can use players that they never would get the chance to otherwise.
posted on 15/1/13
Don't want to
posted on 15/1/13
You could borrow Ibra from someone for a couple of weeks
posted on 15/1/13
Plus, if you have a player in your club which you're not using, you could make money with him, without having to actually sell him.
posted on 15/1/13
Nah. Players come and go too quickly. You'd have to at least set the loan to number of games rather than number of days
posted on 15/1/13
That video is ridiculous. Also some of the people he's playing against are terrible.
I can see the appeal of the loan system but not sure it would work. Couldn't see me paying for a loan of the big players as it just wouldn't be worth it.
posted on 15/1/13
I can see the problem with that being someone borrowing a load of players, but not actually using them, just to annoy the people who actually own them.
posted on 15/1/13
It could be worth it. Say you bought a La Liga squad, but only wanted to use it for one week. Getting Ronaldo on loan for that one week for 100k for example, would surely be a good deal, wouldn't it?
posted on 15/1/13
The people with good players won't want to loan them out. They'll either want to keep them or sell them. Although I think it'd be a bit too exploit-y if you just listed them for loan again and again so you wouldn't actually get much money for it as people would just end up buying anyway?
posted on 15/1/13
I think it would be used by people who aren't using a player, but don't want to get rid of him because they're planning on using him again. By loaning him out, he doesn't just gather dust in his club, but he actually makes him money. Its also a good deal for the people taking the player on loan as they probably won't have the money to buy the player for his full price. You could also use the loan to maybe test out a player to see if he's actually worth saving up for, if you can't afford him then, but could trade up to him.
posted on 15/1/13
It would be abused so heavily.
Say you got Ronaldo in a pack and loaned him out for 100k. After 10 weeks or whatever of loaning him out you could buy another Ronaldo and keep loaning your existing one out. That way in another 10 weeks you could buy Messi. And so on and so on. That's what I'd do anyway.
posted on 15/1/13
Yeah. Ivan u mug stop abusing the system u total cretin
posted on 15/1/13
I'll abuse you.
posted on 15/1/13
dare u
posted on 15/1/13
<abuse>
posted on 15/1/13
True, I see that problem now.
Damn. Its a nice idea in theory though
posted on 15/1/13
fookin hell ivan i didnt mean it you madman
posted on 15/1/13
I wouldn't dare me to abuse you again.
It'll be much worse next time.
posted on 15/1/13
dare u agen
posted on 15/1/13
<ABUSE>
posted on 15/1/13
poor effort
posted on 15/1/13
I would like to do a Eredivisie/Dutch team at some point but the defence is poor.
posted on 15/1/13
No you wouldn't
posted on 15/1/13
I would. I'm moderately enthusiastic about it.
-----------------------Steekelenberg-------------------
Van der Wiel--Heitinga--Douglas--van Aarnholt
----------Sneijder---IF De Jong---IF Eriksen----
------Robben---------van Persie------IF Mertens
Mertens might only have 7 chem though.
Page 1384 of 1754
1385 | 1386 | 1387 | 1388 | 1389