or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 8 comments are related to an article called:

Chamakh or Park???

Page 1 of 1

posted on 25/10/11

think its time to give park a go

posted on 25/10/11

Park is a proper striker, good movement inside the box and deadly finish. Chamakh is just a hold up player with no finishing ability.

posted on 25/10/11

To be honest Park can't play any worse than Chamakh at the moment so we may aswell give him a go

posted on 25/10/11

Park, sorry but Chamakh has had his chances, I think Wenger knows who's better but didn't want to crush Chamakhs already low confidence

posted on 25/10/11

both different players.

Chamakh is a player who will always be in the boxs waiting for the ball and holds the ball and gets players into play. also he likes to link up with players and hasn't had a player yet who links up with him sometime it's Wilshere but he's injured. maybe misses Gourcuff?

Park likes to make runs and is a clinical finisher. thats what we need if van Persie injured, so that says it all.

Park>Chamakh

posted on 25/10/11

Well said we don't have cesc fabregas, I think we are missing a striker like park since eduardo.

posted on 25/10/11

maybe we should have sent Chamakh on loan instead of Bendtner

posted on 25/10/11

park, or bendtner over chamackh, we could really use bendtner at the minute, always rated him, guy just needs a run of games and a bit of support

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment