I did feel somewhat dirty yesterday supporting stoke
the big question is tonight though. I despise city, so naturally want them to lose - but i'm no fan of chelsea either.
then there is the factor of the league. do we want city to lose in the hope they don't go on and win it, or do we want chelsea to lose as they're a challenger for 4th.
nah, sod it! has to be city to lose.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
how can you like city?
they're the epitomy of all that is wrong in football. I used to like them, but all this squit for the last few years has blown that away.
2 of orients goals were penalties
yes. we lost 4-3 they played a team that is in a much higher league but that wasn't the point we culd have beaten them if it wasn't for thier umpire!
he disallowed one of our goals, allowed 2 of theirs which he shouldn't, allowed them to foul us but then blew us up over nothing, he then ended the match 2 minutes early
ZZ used to like City, but now they are better than Arsesnal, so he hates them
His biggest mistake was saying if we had any problems then we could speak to him after the game about it, I have never seen an umpire get away from the pitch so quickly
The difference is though that liverpool have earned the money they are spending, it isn't just coming from some rich benefactor, and they aren't completely naffing the transfer system, and they aren't spending over and above their total income on player wages alone.
I have nothing against the players you listed, but they now play for the club i hate above all others.
Dejong, don't make sweeping statements about me. you know nothing about me. realise that most fans of football now despise city, because they are making a mockery of the game.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
How are we ZZ? It seems you are the one making sweeping statements
It seems you are the one making sweeping statements
------------------------------
Where? I have talked about my opinion, and the fact that from what i can see most football fans now despise city after they have made a mockery of football finance.
You, on the other hand, are trying to tell me what i think.
FRED
ZZ just likes a good whine
ZZ is the ja606 sulk
FRED
ZZ just likes a good whine
ZZ is the ja606 sulk
--------------------------------
whereas dejongs is the JA muppet. i know which i'd rather be.
No, I am not telling you what you think, I am making an observation
City have invested vast amounts of money into the local community
The sheiks have pumped millions into grass roots football. They have also paid over the odds for a few English players, so, in a roundabout way, they have helped other English clubs pay for their stadiums
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
But if that is ruining football then hey ho
1YearSince1DGotSigned where is barry to celebrate?
Either way, like Fred said, football is about entertainment, and my £565 season ticket gets me a lot of entertainment
Man City, looking after their supporters since the year dot
No, I am not telling you what you think, I am making an observation
------------------------------
you stated that i was lying and that i don't like city because they are better than arsenal - when in actual fact i have despised them ever since they started this pathetic attempt to buy the league and not develop themselves slowly into a top side, as all others without a sugar daddy have to.
when you have players out on loan playing week in week out in a top 6 side, who's wages you are still paying, you are distorting the market, to the degree where you are influencing the squads of other clubs. that is simply wrong.
to be paying over and above your total income on wages alone, off the back of a billionaire owner is just wrong (hence uefa doing all they can to stop the practise. it is destroying the game all over europe.)
ordinarily people give respect to a side doing well, even if it's begrudging respect. do you see city getting any of that? there is a reason you're not.... the reasons i have already stated.
Hey guys did any of you get the 1.5 mil comment?
Sign in if you want to comment
ja 606 record
Page 4464 of 18440
4465 | 4466 | 4467 | 4468 | 4469
posted on 12/12/11
I know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
posted on 12/12/11
I did feel somewhat dirty yesterday supporting stoke
the big question is tonight though. I despise city, so naturally want them to lose - but i'm no fan of chelsea either.
then there is the factor of the league. do we want city to lose in the hope they don't go on and win it, or do we want chelsea to lose as they're a challenger for 4th.
nah, sod it! has to be city to lose.
posted on 12/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/12/11
posted on 12/12/11
how can you like city?
they're the epitomy of all that is wrong in football. I used to like them, but all this squit for the last few years has blown that away.
posted on 12/12/11
posted on 12/12/11
2 of orients goals were penalties
yes. we lost 4-3 they played a team that is in a much higher league but that wasn't the point we culd have beaten them if it wasn't for thier umpire!
he disallowed one of our goals, allowed 2 of theirs which he shouldn't, allowed them to foul us but then blew us up over nothing, he then ended the match 2 minutes early
posted on 12/12/11
ZZ used to like City, but now they are better than Arsesnal, so he hates them
posted on 12/12/11
His biggest mistake was saying if we had any problems then we could speak to him after the game about it, I have never seen an umpire get away from the pitch so quickly
posted on 12/12/11
The difference is though that liverpool have earned the money they are spending, it isn't just coming from some rich benefactor, and they aren't completely naffing the transfer system, and they aren't spending over and above their total income on player wages alone.
I have nothing against the players you listed, but they now play for the club i hate above all others.
Dejong, don't make sweeping statements about me. you know nothing about me. realise that most fans of football now despise city, because they are making a mockery of the game.
posted on 12/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/12/11
How are we ZZ? It seems you are the one making sweeping statements
posted on 12/12/11
posted on 12/12/11
It seems you are the one making sweeping statements
------------------------------
Where? I have talked about my opinion, and the fact that from what i can see most football fans now despise city after they have made a mockery of football finance.
You, on the other hand, are trying to tell me what i think.
posted on 12/12/11
FRED
ZZ just likes a good whine
ZZ is the ja606 sulk
posted on 12/12/11
FRED
ZZ just likes a good whine
ZZ is the ja606 sulk
--------------------------------
whereas dejongs is the JA muppet. i know which i'd rather be.
posted on 12/12/11
No, I am not telling you what you think, I am making an observation
City have invested vast amounts of money into the local community
The sheiks have pumped millions into grass roots football. They have also paid over the odds for a few English players, so, in a roundabout way, they have helped other English clubs pay for their stadiums
posted on 12/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/12/11
But if that is ruining football then hey ho
posted on 12/12/11
1YearSince1DGotSigned where is barry to celebrate?
posted on 12/12/11
Either way, like Fred said, football is about entertainment, and my £565 season ticket gets me a lot of entertainment
Man City, looking after their supporters since the year dot
posted on 12/12/11
posted on 12/12/11
No, I am not telling you what you think, I am making an observation
------------------------------
you stated that i was lying and that i don't like city because they are better than arsenal - when in actual fact i have despised them ever since they started this pathetic attempt to buy the league and not develop themselves slowly into a top side, as all others without a sugar daddy have to.
when you have players out on loan playing week in week out in a top 6 side, who's wages you are still paying, you are distorting the market, to the degree where you are influencing the squads of other clubs. that is simply wrong.
to be paying over and above your total income on wages alone, off the back of a billionaire owner is just wrong (hence uefa doing all they can to stop the practise. it is destroying the game all over europe.)
ordinarily people give respect to a side doing well, even if it's begrudging respect. do you see city getting any of that? there is a reason you're not.... the reasons i have already stated.
posted on 12/12/11
zz is right
posted on 12/12/11
Hey guys did any of you get the 1.5 mil comment?
Page 4464 of 18440
4465 | 4466 | 4467 | 4468 | 4469