It does not for one minute apologise for accusing terry of having an affair
--------------------------------------------------------------------
what does it say then if not that ?
Please enlighten me.........
Terry never abused Americans, that is another myth.
He, along with a number of other players were at worst insensitive but their was no abuse.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/1558855.stm
Judging by some of these replies there are clearly some people around who would argue that the world is flat if it suited their utterly biased and one-sided motives.
Hilarious really.
please, show me where the apologies are from any of the papers that i posted links to!
it is you that seems to not be able to grasp a simple sentence
what does it say then if not that ?
Please enlighten me.........
It apologises for printing private information about her in a story ABOUT the affair. private information that was not true.
Cannot spell it out any easier than that for you!
lucas leiva really is that good! >
I asked you a question. Why don't you answer it ?
I asked you that if it is not an apology for alleging an affair between Peroncel and Terry (as you claim) then what it is exactly ?
As I said before please enlighten me. I await your repsonse .........
comment by Dr Carneiro has cured Biggish (U7916)
posted 6 minutes ago
He took out a super injuction just for a laugh
----------------------------------------------------------
Just like Giggs you mean?
Now what is worse,shaaaagging your ex.teammate´s ex girlfriend or shaaaging your brother´s wife?
Tricky one heh?
Giggs was a piece of class that guy is!
..............................
I'm not denying that Giggs did what he did, he was a tool for doing it. Just like JT was.
JFDI (U1657)
There's no point trying to reason with these red top reading buffoons
Like with 99% of people, they are totally brainwashed by the anti-Chelsea media
As I said before please enlighten me. I await your repsonse .........
do you need it in picture format to understand?
It apologises for printing private information about her in a story ABOUT the affair. private information that was not true.
Cannot spell it out any easier than that for you!
Why dont you email them 2 papers and ask them what the y apologised for!
Why did terry and bridge fall out?
why was terry stripped of the england captaincy if these were false accusations?
It apologises for printing private information about her in a story ABOUT the affair. private information that was not true.
Cannot spell it out any easier than that for you!
-------------------------------------------------------------------
No it says,
"we published some personal information about Vanessa Perroncel CONCERNING an alleged affair with the footballer John Terry".
The personal information was concerning an alleged affair with John Terry.
You seem to keep trying to seperate the bit the bit about personal information with the bit about the alleged affair.
Yet they are one and the same thing in this article.
Miss Perroncel has since informed us that she would have preferred her personal information to remain private and it was untrue in any case.
__________________________________________________
Why bother with "Miss Perroncel has since informed us that she would have preferred her personal information to remain private...."?
HAS SINCE INFORMED US?
HUH??
Wasn't that the woman that Mr Whiter Than White (Yeah, Right!) paid off to keep quiet?
Why can't the OP writer accept that JT is an arrogant philandering lying cheating thug?
Yeah Bubbles, funny thing is though some of them spent years campaigning against the media because they know they lie and make up stories.
Why did JT take out a super injunction if he didn't do anything wrong?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
we published some personal information about Vanessa Perroncel CONCERNING an alleged affair with the footballer John Terry"
yes, the private information they printed was concerning (on the subject of) the affair. if they were apologising for the affair part they would not go into more detail than they have to (your words not mine)
it really is simple to understand but you fail to grasp it time and time again. the apology was for incorrect information about her personal life, what is so difficult?
you highlighted the "concerning" bit so i thought i would give you a definition. it concerns it because it was in the affair article that they wrote the incorrect info
Despite the defamatory claims from the two gloryhunters above we (Chelsea fans) accept that JT isn't a Saint, but he is hardly the antiChrist either.
Their hypocrisy is laughable given what has emerged about Giggs (United) and what we all know about Gerrard (Liverpool) in the last 18 months or so
Their hypocrisy is laughable given what has emerged about Giggs (United)
...................
What hypocrisy?
We know what Giggs did, he was an idiot for doing it. Why can't you Chelsea fans just accept Terry was in the wrong instead of articles like this popping up trying to defend him?
Despite the defamatory claims from the two gloryhunters above we (Chelsea fans) accept that JT isn't a Saint, but he is hardly the antiChrist either.
Their hypocrisy is laughable given what has emerged about Giggs (United) and what we all know about Gerrard (Liverpool) in the last 18 months or so
this isnt a "who is worse than who" argument. we are simply trying to educate an unfortunate simpleton on the ability to understand a paragraph. I suggest you help him out
From your Mikel link doubting he cost £16 Million it says only with Lyn was there an issue. So the £12 Million to United stands...
If Chelsea had won the court case then it wouldn't have been settled out of court so we can assume Chelsea had to at least give Lyn some money lets call it 2 as its half way between both..
So with Mikel still costing at least £14 Million it is not far off...
Ruiney
Who is defending him? We accept he was wrong to cheat on his wife. But he isn't the antiChrist as some would have you believe, in the same way Giggs isn't. We're all human, we all make mistakes
All we ask for is for people to condemn Terry for the facts.
Who is defending him? We accept he was wrong to cheat on his wife. But he isn't the antiChrist as some would have you believe, in the same way Giggs isn't. We're all human, we all make mistakes
SuperFrank for one. The guy would argue that day was night
Well then Bubbles, maybe you could explain to your fellow Chelsea fan that the whole incident did happen, and the apology was for small details, not the whole story.
Well it depends on what you call small details, I'd call making up the fact Vanessa Perroncel was pregnant with JT's child pretty big
We don't know the full facts but it's pretty obvious they had some form of relationship
I might be wrong but I thought she gave an interview to GMTV where she categorically denied having an affair with JT.
He's still a massive
A disgrace to the shirt, both England & Chelsea
Sign in if you want to comment
Why do some people find it so hard to
Page 2 of 5
posted on 28/10/11
It does not for one minute apologise for accusing terry of having an affair
--------------------------------------------------------------------
what does it say then if not that ?
Please enlighten me.........
posted on 28/10/11
Terry never abused Americans, that is another myth.
He, along with a number of other players were at worst insensitive but their was no abuse.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/1558855.stm
posted on 28/10/11
Judging by some of these replies there are clearly some people around who would argue that the world is flat if it suited their utterly biased and one-sided motives.
Hilarious really.
please, show me where the apologies are from any of the papers that i posted links to!
it is you that seems to not be able to grasp a simple sentence
posted on 28/10/11
what does it say then if not that ?
Please enlighten me.........
It apologises for printing private information about her in a story ABOUT the affair. private information that was not true.
Cannot spell it out any easier than that for you!
posted on 28/10/11
lucas leiva really is that good! >
I asked you a question. Why don't you answer it ?
I asked you that if it is not an apology for alleging an affair between Peroncel and Terry (as you claim) then what it is exactly ?
As I said before please enlighten me. I await your repsonse .........
posted on 28/10/11
comment by Dr Carneiro has cured Biggish (U7916)
posted 6 minutes ago
He took out a super injuction just for a laugh
----------------------------------------------------------
Just like Giggs you mean?
Now what is worse,shaaaagging your ex.teammate´s ex girlfriend or shaaaging your brother´s wife?
Tricky one heh?
Giggs was a piece of class that guy is!
..............................
I'm not denying that Giggs did what he did, he was a tool for doing it. Just like JT was.
posted on 28/10/11
JFDI (U1657)
There's no point trying to reason with these red top reading buffoons
Like with 99% of people, they are totally brainwashed by the anti-Chelsea media
posted on 28/10/11
As I said before please enlighten me. I await your repsonse .........
do you need it in picture format to understand?
It apologises for printing private information about her in a story ABOUT the affair. private information that was not true.
Cannot spell it out any easier than that for you!
Why dont you email them 2 papers and ask them what the y apologised for!
Why did terry and bridge fall out?
why was terry stripped of the england captaincy if these were false accusations?
posted on 28/10/11
It apologises for printing private information about her in a story ABOUT the affair. private information that was not true.
Cannot spell it out any easier than that for you!
-------------------------------------------------------------------
No it says,
"we published some personal information about Vanessa Perroncel CONCERNING an alleged affair with the footballer John Terry".
The personal information was concerning an alleged affair with John Terry.
You seem to keep trying to seperate the bit the bit about personal information with the bit about the alleged affair.
Yet they are one and the same thing in this article.
posted on 28/10/11
Miss Perroncel has since informed us that she would have preferred her personal information to remain private and it was untrue in any case.
__________________________________________________
Why bother with "Miss Perroncel has since informed us that she would have preferred her personal information to remain private...."?
HAS SINCE INFORMED US?
HUH??
Wasn't that the woman that Mr Whiter Than White (Yeah, Right!) paid off to keep quiet?
Why can't the OP writer accept that JT is an arrogant philandering lying cheating thug?
posted on 28/10/11
Yeah Bubbles, funny thing is though some of them spent years campaigning against the media because they know they lie and make up stories.
posted on 28/10/11
Why did JT take out a super injunction if he didn't do anything wrong?
posted on 28/10/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/11
we published some personal information about Vanessa Perroncel CONCERNING an alleged affair with the footballer John Terry"
yes, the private information they printed was concerning (on the subject of) the affair. if they were apologising for the affair part they would not go into more detail than they have to (your words not mine)
it really is simple to understand but you fail to grasp it time and time again. the apology was for incorrect information about her personal life, what is so difficult?
you highlighted the "concerning" bit so i thought i would give you a definition. it concerns it because it was in the affair article that they wrote the incorrect info
posted on 28/10/11
Despite the defamatory claims from the two gloryhunters above we (Chelsea fans) accept that JT isn't a Saint, but he is hardly the antiChrist either.
Their hypocrisy is laughable given what has emerged about Giggs (United) and what we all know about Gerrard (Liverpool) in the last 18 months or so
posted on 28/10/11
Their hypocrisy is laughable given what has emerged about Giggs (United)
...................
What hypocrisy?
We know what Giggs did, he was an idiot for doing it. Why can't you Chelsea fans just accept Terry was in the wrong instead of articles like this popping up trying to defend him?
posted on 28/10/11
Despite the defamatory claims from the two gloryhunters above we (Chelsea fans) accept that JT isn't a Saint, but he is hardly the antiChrist either.
Their hypocrisy is laughable given what has emerged about Giggs (United) and what we all know about Gerrard (Liverpool) in the last 18 months or so
this isnt a "who is worse than who" argument. we are simply trying to educate an unfortunate simpleton on the ability to understand a paragraph. I suggest you help him out
posted on 28/10/11
From your Mikel link doubting he cost £16 Million it says only with Lyn was there an issue. So the £12 Million to United stands...
If Chelsea had won the court case then it wouldn't have been settled out of court so we can assume Chelsea had to at least give Lyn some money lets call it 2 as its half way between both..
So with Mikel still costing at least £14 Million it is not far off...
posted on 28/10/11
Ruiney
Who is defending him? We accept he was wrong to cheat on his wife. But he isn't the antiChrist as some would have you believe, in the same way Giggs isn't. We're all human, we all make mistakes
posted on 28/10/11
All we ask for is for people to condemn Terry for the facts.
posted on 28/10/11
Who is defending him? We accept he was wrong to cheat on his wife. But he isn't the antiChrist as some would have you believe, in the same way Giggs isn't. We're all human, we all make mistakes
SuperFrank for one. The guy would argue that day was night
posted on 28/10/11
Well then Bubbles, maybe you could explain to your fellow Chelsea fan that the whole incident did happen, and the apology was for small details, not the whole story.
posted on 28/10/11
Well it depends on what you call small details, I'd call making up the fact Vanessa Perroncel was pregnant with JT's child pretty big
We don't know the full facts but it's pretty obvious they had some form of relationship
posted on 28/10/11
I might be wrong but I thought she gave an interview to GMTV where she categorically denied having an affair with JT.
posted on 28/10/11
He's still a massive
A disgrace to the shirt, both England & Chelsea
Page 2 of 5