I havent seen Bubbles as of late, I think it has something to do with the Chelsea teams current form
^^^
And yet we're still above Liverpool
^^^^^
Until you get beat by blackburn
I trust we'll put up a better show against Rovers than you did
What do you mean "you"?
My team hasn't played Blackburn this season.
The constant Anti-Chelsea conspiracy articles are not only a very feeble way to justify the alleged accusations made to John Terry, but are also tiresome now.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This paragraph does not make any sense.
Why not Dr?
He's made numerous articles claiming that with any other team these allegations would have been swept under the rug. Hence trying to justify them.
Does this scouser ever make sense Biggish?
You have written that he is trying to justify the allegations/accusations which would mean he is advocating they are correct.
Well my first encounter with this user I think, but if he writes like this all the time he would be quite difficult to interpret.
Actually, claiming that everyone else would be allowed to get away with this kind of behaviour is a form of justification. Don't you agree?
Anyway, I find these whole issues tiresome because the wum wannabees and bitter rival fans always take the opportunity to jump the gun,spout their prejudice bile before a fair and diligent process has been performed by the appropriate body,which in this case is the criminal justice system.
And if no charges are made or if Terry is charged and found not guilty it won´t stop them even then. Now that is tiresome!
That is not what that paragraph is saying. Well I don´t know what it is saying I can only guess as to its intentional meaning.
It was clear to previous posters. If you genuinely can't get your head around that paragraph, even after it's explained to you, then I suggest you avoid any advanced reading in the near future.
You're obsessive hatred with our club and all our fans is not just stalkerish but getting a bit teedious now.
There is absolutely nothing advanced in your entire article or attempted arguments other than some early signs of dementia.
It was clear to previous posters
------------------------------------------------
Really,that is a strange claim and I wonder if you can back that up because looking through all the previous posters you refer to on this thread I find I was the first one to actually make a comment in relation to your article.
Although feck knows why I bothered given its inept quality.
Sturridge's right foot, you my friend, are clearly a child.
Oh dear Dr. I like your diagnosis, but I didn't say my article was advanced. Anyway if we devolve this conversation any further then the previously mentioned child will probably throw another tantrum. (He has a very limited understanding of language structure you see).
"Sturridge's right foot, you my friend, are clearly a child."
This from some one who comes on and makes random unprovoked attacks on Chelsea fans? what is it about us that upset's you so much? was you're abusive father a Chelsea fans or something?
The fact that you are trying to impersonate whatnext is just very very sad.
comment by The Atistical Stanalyst (U5482)
posted 5 minutes ago
Sturridge's right foot, you my friend, are clearly a child.
---------------------------
He really is, the other night when I asked him to learn the difference between 'your' and 'you're' (because it was annoying to read the error over and over again), he took it as a 'personal attack' (he did say this) and proceeded to deleting all my comments there on after.
He really is a child
^ well done bubbly you have made yourself as sad as stanlyst, i didn't even think that was possible.
Ill love to continue chatting but i have things to do goodnight.
As for Bubbles, well let's just say one of his most idiotic Articles recently got firmly put in it's place.
They seem to be unable to recognise the difference between, 'media-hatred', and profit margins.
Sensationalism and controversial material is a sure way to get hits.
omment by Sturridge's right foot - the 606 'grammar police' are the saddest people on the planet (U1762)
posted 1 minute ago
^ well done bubbly you have made yourself as sad as stanlyst, i didn't even think that was possible.
Ill love to continue chatting but i have things to do goodnight.
-------------------------------
How does that make me sad? Just because I can remember an Article from two nights ago does not make me sad!
Have I upset you Sturridge? Or has mummy sent you to bed!
Sir Bubbly
===
It's incredible, but he constantly uses "your" and "you're" but every time he gets it wrong. Every. Single. Time. Take a look at that last comment about "you're abusive father"
Yes, he seems to thinks that by disregarding his opinion due to his apparently limited mental capacity, is a personal attack. Personally I fail to see how that is lower than making light of domestic abuse. But hey, that's just me!
Like most Chelsea fans, he can give but can't take it back.
Sign in if you want to comment
Bubbles
Page 1 of 2
posted on 2/11/11
posted on 2/11/11
I havent seen Bubbles as of late, I think it has something to do with the Chelsea teams current form
posted on 2/11/11
^^^
And yet we're still above Liverpool
posted on 2/11/11
^^^^^
Until you get beat by blackburn
posted on 2/11/11
I trust we'll put up a better show against Rovers than you did
posted on 2/11/11
What do you mean "you"?
My team hasn't played Blackburn this season.
posted on 2/11/11
The constant Anti-Chelsea conspiracy articles are not only a very feeble way to justify the alleged accusations made to John Terry, but are also tiresome now.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This paragraph does not make any sense.
posted on 2/11/11
Why not Dr?
He's made numerous articles claiming that with any other team these allegations would have been swept under the rug. Hence trying to justify them.
posted on 2/11/11
Does this scouser ever make sense Biggish?
posted on 2/11/11
You have written that he is trying to justify the allegations/accusations which would mean he is advocating they are correct.
posted on 2/11/11
Well my first encounter with this user I think, but if he writes like this all the time he would be quite difficult to interpret.
posted on 2/11/11
Actually, claiming that everyone else would be allowed to get away with this kind of behaviour is a form of justification. Don't you agree?
posted on 2/11/11
Anyway, I find these whole issues tiresome because the wum wannabees and bitter rival fans always take the opportunity to jump the gun,spout their prejudice bile before a fair and diligent process has been performed by the appropriate body,which in this case is the criminal justice system.
And if no charges are made or if Terry is charged and found not guilty it won´t stop them even then. Now that is tiresome!
posted on 2/11/11
That is not what that paragraph is saying. Well I don´t know what it is saying I can only guess as to its intentional meaning.
posted on 2/11/11
It was clear to previous posters. If you genuinely can't get your head around that paragraph, even after it's explained to you, then I suggest you avoid any advanced reading in the near future.
posted on 2/11/11
You're obsessive hatred with our club and all our fans is not just stalkerish but getting a bit teedious now.
posted on 2/11/11
There is absolutely nothing advanced in your entire article or attempted arguments other than some early signs of dementia.
posted on 2/11/11
It was clear to previous posters
------------------------------------------------
Really,that is a strange claim and I wonder if you can back that up because looking through all the previous posters you refer to on this thread I find I was the first one to actually make a comment in relation to your article.
Although feck knows why I bothered given its inept quality.
posted on 2/11/11
Sturridge's right foot, you my friend, are clearly a child.
Oh dear Dr. I like your diagnosis, but I didn't say my article was advanced. Anyway if we devolve this conversation any further then the previously mentioned child will probably throw another tantrum. (He has a very limited understanding of language structure you see).
posted on 2/11/11
"Sturridge's right foot, you my friend, are clearly a child."
This from some one who comes on and makes random unprovoked attacks on Chelsea fans? what is it about us that upset's you so much? was you're abusive father a Chelsea fans or something?
The fact that you are trying to impersonate whatnext is just very very sad.
posted on 2/11/11
comment by The Atistical Stanalyst (U5482)
posted 5 minutes ago
Sturridge's right foot, you my friend, are clearly a child.
---------------------------
He really is, the other night when I asked him to learn the difference between 'your' and 'you're' (because it was annoying to read the error over and over again), he took it as a 'personal attack' (he did say this) and proceeded to deleting all my comments there on after.
He really is a child
posted on 2/11/11
^ well done bubbly you have made yourself as sad as stanlyst, i didn't even think that was possible.
Ill love to continue chatting but i have things to do goodnight.
posted on 2/11/11
As for Bubbles, well let's just say one of his most idiotic Articles recently got firmly put in it's place.
They seem to be unable to recognise the difference between, 'media-hatred', and profit margins.
Sensationalism and controversial material is a sure way to get hits.
posted on 2/11/11
omment by Sturridge's right foot - the 606 'grammar police' are the saddest people on the planet (U1762)
posted 1 minute ago
^ well done bubbly you have made yourself as sad as stanlyst, i didn't even think that was possible.
Ill love to continue chatting but i have things to do goodnight.
-------------------------------
How does that make me sad? Just because I can remember an Article from two nights ago does not make me sad!
Have I upset you Sturridge? Or has mummy sent you to bed!
posted on 2/11/11
Sir Bubbly
===
It's incredible, but he constantly uses "your" and "you're" but every time he gets it wrong. Every. Single. Time. Take a look at that last comment about "you're abusive father"
Yes, he seems to thinks that by disregarding his opinion due to his apparently limited mental capacity, is a personal attack. Personally I fail to see how that is lower than making light of domestic abuse. But hey, that's just me!
Like most Chelsea fans, he can give but can't take it back.
Page 1 of 2