The irony of your post coupled with the inevitable 'whitabootery' is astounding.
Glove - so you are saying that one is OK and the other is a hanging offense?
Why not just utterly condemn both?
Whitabootery is indeed inevitable. McAvenie, Hartson and Pearson spring to mind.
You can always tell the 'Angry of Mayfair' types by their myopic tunnel vision and rampant mopery.
I'm not condemning the lad nor am I condoning. I'll wait for the details of what he is alleged to have done first.
We all know what the G B did with their banner. There's no allegation. It's a fact and their behaviour was infinitely more offensive than a drunken youth allegedly spouting some ill advised rubbish deemed to be 'sectarian'. Has Lawwell lived up to his promise to hunt them down and ban them yet? One incident is an act of drunken indiscretion by an individual outside a night club, the other a pre-meditated act by an organised group who soberly considered how they could cause maximum offence to the families that made the ultimate sacrifice to defend their civil liberties..
Whitabootery???
I'm all for it.
It exposes the vacuum at the core of your pre-packed hysterical reaction.
"I'm not condemning the lad"
So you think being a bigot is acceptable?
Cooper.
Learn to read.
I'm saying one is an allegation the other an indisputable.
fact.
I'll leave my decision on whether or not Adam's alleged indiscretion merits punishment when the details emerge. I'll leave the rush to premature condemnation to the righteously indignant like you.
It exposes the vacuum at the core of your pre-packed hysterical reaction.
Pre-packed ? The tax case is really having an effect on you
hysterical reaction.
See your follow up post for that. Really showing yourself up here smell
comment by Zico™@Celtic have money to burn.com (U9501)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I'm not condemning the lad"
So you think being a bigot is acceptable?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I see your attention span didn't get as far as the end of the sentence you partially and selectively quote.
Typical of your sort your determination to find offence knows no bounds. Go nurse your hysteria in a dark room.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sadly for you, you're entire post falls down here 'Meanwhile another club allows banners condemning those that foughtto ensure theyhad the right to freedom of speech'
Here we go....
a headlong rush to draw conclusions about something they know next to nothing about, yet not one word condemning the GB's disgusting banner.
Myopic hysteria from 'Angry of Mayfair' brigade.
comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 1 minute ago
'indisputable fact'.
You sure about that. Looked to me like quite a lot of it was your own opinion.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
comment by Bravis Tickle (U6125)
posted 22 seconds ago
Sadly for you, you're entire post falls down here 'Meanwhile another club allows banners condemning those that foughtto ensure theyhad the right to freedom of speech'
++++++++++++++
and now it's defence of the indefensible.
C'Mon then Angries of Mayfair...let's hear the excuses..let's hear how the banner was perfectly acceptable due to it's 'political' nature.....
Zico, you have on a number of occasions as have many of your compatriots used the term 'bun', yet do
not see this as being sectarian. Before passing judgement look at your own conduct.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
smelltheglove.................you don't have the brains that God gave you .
Your third sentence is a contradiction.
I would prefer that the british goverment stopped invading oil producing countries to help the 'locals' who then get offended and bomb our shores..............leave them alone and they'll have no cause.
comment by PontiusP (U6729)
posted 1 minute ago
smelltheglove.................you don't have the brains that God gave you .
Your third sentence is a contradiction.
I would prefer that the british goverment stopped invading oil producing countries to help the 'locals' who then get offended and bomb our shores..............leave them alone and they'll have no cause.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
and with not a hint of embarrassment the dead of two world wars are dismissed and condemned.
It's our title................. which religion is Hunism
Shame FC always looking for others that are as bad as them, still not found any.
smelltheglove..................if you want to bring out a poppy only for the two world wars I'll wear it.........GIRUY ya bigot.
"comment by It's our Title so Cry if you want to (U4043)
posted 4 minutes ago
Zico, you have on a number of occasions as have many of your compatriots used the term 'bun', yet do
not see this as being sectarian. Before passing judgement look at your own conduct."
-------------------------------------
I couldn't be bigoted if I tried. For many others on here, I sense it comes to them very easily.
Anyway, the OP and smelltheglove are ridiculous.
"I can't condemn or condone his behaviour"
I see you've been so embarrassed by this line, you've now removed it
comment by PontiusP (U6729)
posted 56 seconds ago
smelltheglove..................if you want to bring out a poppy only for the two world wars I'll wear it.........GIRUY ya bigot.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
and in the interim you'll be popping down your local garage to fill your car with petrol stolen from oppressed nations....
righteous indignation and hypocrisy don't sit well together.
comment by Zico™@Celtic have money to burn.com (U9501)
posted 2 minutes ago
Anyway, the OP and smelltheglove are ridiculous.
"I can't condemn or condone his behaviour"
I see you've been so embarrassed by this line, you've now removed it
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oh really?
Be careful, you might find yourself accused of ignoring facts in a rush to judgement and a mope like yourself just wouldn't do that would he?
comment by smelltheglove (U5671)
"and in the interim you'll be popping down your local garage to fill your car with petrol stolen from oppressed nations.... "
Pontious
You are saying that you have not used the term, further will you publicly condemn any use of it on here, or will you excuse it as just a bit of banter.
It is not looking for others for whitabootery do you deny
most Celtic fans use/have used the term.
Why do you baulk at using the word Rangers is it a religious observance.
smelltheshite
did you forget to take your happy juice this morning. Calm down and accept what your club is. If in any doubt ask UEFA they'll tell you
Sign in if you want to comment
All things are relative.
Page 1 of 3
posted on 7/11/11
The irony of your post coupled with the inevitable 'whitabootery' is astounding.
posted on 7/11/11
Glove - so you are saying that one is OK and the other is a hanging offense?
Why not just utterly condemn both?
posted on 7/11/11
Whitabootery is indeed inevitable. McAvenie, Hartson and Pearson spring to mind.
You can always tell the 'Angry of Mayfair' types by their myopic tunnel vision and rampant mopery.
I'm not condemning the lad nor am I condoning. I'll wait for the details of what he is alleged to have done first.
We all know what the G B did with their banner. There's no allegation. It's a fact and their behaviour was infinitely more offensive than a drunken youth allegedly spouting some ill advised rubbish deemed to be 'sectarian'. Has Lawwell lived up to his promise to hunt them down and ban them yet? One incident is an act of drunken indiscretion by an individual outside a night club, the other a pre-meditated act by an organised group who soberly considered how they could cause maximum offence to the families that made the ultimate sacrifice to defend their civil liberties..
Whitabootery???
I'm all for it.
It exposes the vacuum at the core of your pre-packed hysterical reaction.
posted on 7/11/11
"I'm not condemning the lad"
So you think being a bigot is acceptable?
posted on 7/11/11
Cooper.
Learn to read.
I'm saying one is an allegation the other an indisputable.
fact.
I'll leave my decision on whether or not Adam's alleged indiscretion merits punishment when the details emerge. I'll leave the rush to premature condemnation to the righteously indignant like you.
posted on 7/11/11
It exposes the vacuum at the core of your pre-packed hysterical reaction.
Pre-packed ? The tax case is really having an effect on you
posted on 7/11/11
hysterical reaction.
See your follow up post for that. Really showing yourself up here smell
posted on 7/11/11
comment by Zico™@Celtic have money to burn.com (U9501)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I'm not condemning the lad"
So you think being a bigot is acceptable?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I see your attention span didn't get as far as the end of the sentence you partially and selectively quote.
Typical of your sort your determination to find offence knows no bounds. Go nurse your hysteria in a dark room.
posted on 7/11/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/11/11
Sadly for you, you're entire post falls down here 'Meanwhile another club allows banners condemning those that foughtto ensure theyhad the right to freedom of speech'
posted on 7/11/11
Here we go....
a headlong rush to draw conclusions about something they know next to nothing about, yet not one word condemning the GB's disgusting banner.
Myopic hysteria from 'Angry of Mayfair' brigade.
posted on 7/11/11
comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 1 minute ago
'indisputable fact'.
You sure about that. Looked to me like quite a lot of it was your own opinion.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
comment by Bravis Tickle (U6125)
posted 22 seconds ago
Sadly for you, you're entire post falls down here 'Meanwhile another club allows banners condemning those that foughtto ensure theyhad the right to freedom of speech'
++++++++++++++
and now it's defence of the indefensible.
C'Mon then Angries of Mayfair...let's hear the excuses..let's hear how the banner was perfectly acceptable due to it's 'political' nature.....
posted on 7/11/11
Zico, you have on a number of occasions as have many of your compatriots used the term 'bun', yet do
not see this as being sectarian. Before passing judgement look at your own conduct.
posted on 7/11/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/11/11
smelltheglove.................you don't have the brains that God gave you .
Your third sentence is a contradiction.
I would prefer that the british goverment stopped invading oil producing countries to help the 'locals' who then get offended and bomb our shores..............leave them alone and they'll have no cause.
posted on 7/11/11
comment by PontiusP (U6729)
posted 1 minute ago
smelltheglove.................you don't have the brains that God gave you .
Your third sentence is a contradiction.
I would prefer that the british goverment stopped invading oil producing countries to help the 'locals' who then get offended and bomb our shores..............leave them alone and they'll have no cause.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
and with not a hint of embarrassment the dead of two world wars are dismissed and condemned.
posted on 7/11/11
It's our title................. which religion is Hunism
Shame FC always looking for others that are as bad as them, still not found any.
posted on 7/11/11
smelltheglove..................if you want to bring out a poppy only for the two world wars I'll wear it.........GIRUY ya bigot.
posted on 7/11/11
"comment by It's our Title so Cry if you want to (U4043)
posted 4 minutes ago
Zico, you have on a number of occasions as have many of your compatriots used the term 'bun', yet do
not see this as being sectarian. Before passing judgement look at your own conduct."
-------------------------------------
I couldn't be bigoted if I tried. For many others on here, I sense it comes to them very easily.
Anyway, the OP and smelltheglove are ridiculous.
"I can't condemn or condone his behaviour"
I see you've been so embarrassed by this line, you've now removed it
posted on 7/11/11
comment by PontiusP (U6729)
posted 56 seconds ago
smelltheglove..................if you want to bring out a poppy only for the two world wars I'll wear it.........GIRUY ya bigot.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
and in the interim you'll be popping down your local garage to fill your car with petrol stolen from oppressed nations....
righteous indignation and hypocrisy don't sit well together.
posted on 7/11/11
comment by Zico™@Celtic have money to burn.com (U9501)
posted 2 minutes ago
Anyway, the OP and smelltheglove are ridiculous.
"I can't condemn or condone his behaviour"
I see you've been so embarrassed by this line, you've now removed it
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oh really?
Be careful, you might find yourself accused of ignoring facts in a rush to judgement and a mope like yourself just wouldn't do that would he?
posted on 7/11/11
comment by smelltheglove (U5671)
"and in the interim you'll be popping down your local garage to fill your car with petrol stolen from oppressed nations.... "
posted on 7/11/11
Pontious
You are saying that you have not used the term, further will you publicly condemn any use of it on here, or will you excuse it as just a bit of banter.
It is not looking for others for whitabootery do you deny
most Celtic fans use/have used the term.
Why do you baulk at using the word Rangers is it a religious observance.
posted on 7/11/11
Smell has lost the plot
posted on 7/11/11
smelltheshite
did you forget to take your happy juice this morning. Calm down and accept what your club is. If in any doubt ask UEFA they'll tell you
Page 1 of 3