Why can't he learn to be more civil

good 1 nwo

your really showing yourself up as a childish little plastic, if only you showed as much fervour to supporting your team as you do being an idiot I would show you a modicum of respect.

As it stands you just come across as an immature pedant!

He'll probably be a bit embarrassed when the crack wears off.

I don't think he's self aware enough for embarasment, no doubt his new thing of trying to be poetic is taking up all his limited imagination!

comment by Cityblueloz, the dude abides! (U6305)

your really showing yourself up as a childish little.............you just come across as an immature pedant!
_____________________________________________________

There's nothing like someone, trying to put you down
When their use of basic English, really makes you frown
You're is short for "you are" e.g. you are quite aggressive,
Your is belonging to, of, or related to you, a form of the possessive
It might just be my preference, but I'd rather be a pedant,
Than a sad abusive little boy, who it seems, can only rant.
The bile you spout, must make you choke
No wonder we think, you're a joke
Forever on here, lashing out
You scream and cry, abuse and shout
You really do, have all my pity
And on top of that, you support Man City

that really is very good
top marks

why is it that haters only seem to talk about city's spending and not the money they got from sales of players?

when they talk about their team, it is always net spend.

hasn't king kenny spent over 100 million in about 9 months?

surely to goodness that's a lot of money to just finish top half

because they dont sell their players, they loan then out to other clubs and pay half their wages, terminate their contracts with no sale or possibly even fire them.

so boateng wasn't sold then? neither was shay given, SWP or Jo?

that's just the summer.

thanks for setting me straight.

Wayne are you in a band? Me and my mate are looking to recruit a leadsinger/lyrics writer and I think you could be the man for the job.

ok then, what is City's net transfer spend since Thaksin came ?

Don't see why it matters to everyone so much. We wouldn't have spent half as much as we have done if we'd have had the Sheikh and Mancini in from the start, as it was, we had a few teething problems and ended up spending more than we could have, but at the end of the day if 20 years from now the books will have balanced out and we have players coming through the 'Etihad Campus', will people still refer to our expenditure between 2006-2011 to support their petty arguments?

nwo

dont throw stones if you have a dodgy green house.

don't they have to "balance the books" right now ?

I don't think their expected to stump up x amount of hundred million pounds overnight, no.

FFP

Wasn't aware they are being implemented as of tomorrow.

its been in for months

"This is the first season that counts towards the 2013/14 assessment but clubs will be allowed to make a loss of 45m euros (£39.4m) over the three years, falling to 30m euros from 2015/16."

"It is not until 2018 that clubs have to bring their annual losses below £8.8m."

got a long way to go to even meet 45m loss

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2052266/Manchester-City-set-announce-record-loss.html

Doubt we'll spend anywhere near what we have done the past couple of seasons in each summer between now and 2018 though.

read the rules transfer fees are spread out over the length of the players contracts, so all the players signed in the last three years will affect the accounts until those contracts expire

http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefaorg/Clublicensing/01/50/09/12/1500912_DOWNLOAD.pdf

2018 is quite a bit off, and that's not even to break even, if we can't comply with that I'd be very suprised and wonder what monkeys we are employing in the backroom.