or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 18 comments are related to an article called:

Tendulkar doesn't perform on the big stage?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 12/11/11

Tendulkar >>> Anyone since Bradman.

posted on 12/11/11

forget tendulkar for a minute. before someone compares a batsman with tendulkar they need to pass the wall, and im sure no one is better than dravid par tendulkar. Dravid + tendulkar = the top 2 run getters in cricket history. No other team will ever see the 2 top run getters sharing the same dressing room after this.

posted on 12/11/11

Lol look at the Sachin worshipers. He isn't even the best batsman in the sub cont so forget world cricket past or present.

posted on 12/11/11

lol, he's the best batsman to ever grace the field since Bradman.

posted on 12/11/11

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/cricket-world-cup/8414462/India-v-Pakistan-Sachin-Tendulkar-is-the-best-batsman-ever-to-play-cricket.html

posted on 12/11/11

shorty sachin is not a match winner

lara's the best sorry indyans

posted on 12/11/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/11/11

take it easy sir sachin aka neon

you racist

lara is the best...prove otherwise haha

posted on 12/11/11

@ Footie

Lara has lower number of runs in ODI and Tests.
Lara has lower average in ODI and tests.
Lara never won a World Cup.(Understandable...it's a team game..But no Cup with Ambrose & Walsh bowling is poor.)
Lara-Sachin in World Cups isn't even worth a comparison.

Sachin is best... prove otherwise haha

posted on 12/11/11

lara has not played the number of games as shorty sachin
his average is low of course because his number of games played are less than what shorty has played
if a player starts playing from what 16 or 17 and is still playing at the age of i dunno 37 then definitely that player will have an average greater than bloody don bradman

posted on 12/11/11

"his average is low of course because his number of games played are less than what shorty has played"

"if a player starts playing from what 16 or 17 and is still playing at the age of i dunno 37 then definitely that player will have an average greater than bloody don bradman "
...................................................................

OMG !! Does THIS explain your brain or the Pakistani education system ??
I think both..

posted on 12/11/11

haha...can't believe he did a LOL after THAT post.

comment by (U6361)

posted on 12/11/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/11/11

haha neon, same can be said about Footie's brain as well

posted on 12/11/11

I prefer Dravid to Tendulkar .I find him a more pleasent fella.Thats just my personal opinion..
During the England test series Sachin's attitude with the none existant issues of behind the bowlers arm. were to much..IMO he acted like that cause he knew he was likely to get out due to the England bowling a good lenght..
Dravid on the other hand just got on with it and reaped the rewards.,He also was the only Indian with any fight in him..

comment by (U6361)

posted on 12/11/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 13/11/11


"lara has not played the number of games as shorty sachin
his average is low of course because his number of games played are less than what shorty has played
if a player starts playing from what 16 or 17 and is still playing at the age of i dunno 37 then definitely that player will have an average greater than bloody don bradman "
------------------------------

I would not participate in such arguments saying "my dad is better than yours" etc. but this particular comment made me sit up. Really? You could bring lots of other things about Sachin (2003 & 2011 finals failure, even the ball-biting allegation if you like), but your argument is totally foolish (mildly put).

posted on 13/11/11

The idea that the more games you play the higher your average will be, flies in the face of reality.
Micheal Clarke once had an average above 70 after a handful of games as did Trott, not any more though.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment