Bergkamp pretty much played as an attacking midfielder. the best way to settle it would be to ask neutrals, i'm sure 90% will say DB. the only people saying Drogba are Chelsea fans
I am a neutral
Bergkamp, easily.
Silly comparison though
As you said he pretty much played as an attacking midfielder so you can't really compare them. I don't really care what idiots like Mark Lawrenson and such think.
i can't believe i got people to bite to that again!
drogba in his prime> rvp now. truth hurts.
RVP has more technical ability in his pubes than Drogba ever had.
technical ability isn't everything pal, hence why drogba in his prime was better than RVP now.
Shearer was better than drogba in his prime though
technical ability isn't everything pal, hence why drogba in his prime was better than RVP now.
------
that's just your opinion.
Sign in if you want to comment
Vote
Page 2 of 2
posted on 29/11/11
posted on 29/11/11
Bergkamp pretty much played as an attacking midfielder. the best way to settle it would be to ask neutrals, i'm sure 90% will say DB. the only people saying Drogba are Chelsea fans
posted on 29/11/11
I am a neutral
Bergkamp, easily.
Silly comparison though
posted on 29/11/11
As you said he pretty much played as an attacking midfielder so you can't really compare them. I don't really care what idiots like Mark Lawrenson and such think.
posted on 29/11/11
i can't believe i got people to bite to that again!
posted on 29/11/11
Mark Lawrenson
posted on 29/11/11
i didnt bite
posted on 29/11/11
Me either
posted on 29/11/11
Or me
posted on 29/11/11
drogba in his prime> rvp now. truth hurts.
posted on 29/11/11
RVP has more technical ability in his pubes than Drogba ever had.
posted on 29/11/11
technical ability isn't everything pal, hence why drogba in his prime was better than RVP now.
posted on 29/11/11
Shearer was better than drogba in his prime though
posted on 29/11/11
technical ability isn't everything pal, hence why drogba in his prime was better than RVP now.
------
that's just your opinion.
Page 2 of 2