He doesn't seem to realise the table measures the difference between outgoing transfers and incoming transfers. Arsenal have paid a strong profit in this regard, like all selling clubs! Which makes the fact they have twice as much net debt as Spurs very amusing
it does not say stoke and villa have spent more than united. if you read the table carefully, the rankings are based on 'average money spent per season'.
Too many people laughing at their own comments...........
it shows that we are amazing in the transfer market.
it says united have spent 217m
stoke 72
villa 168
but the table is set up on money made/loss over the years. it shows united sold 160
stoke 11
villa 100
overall, united lose less than them two a year.
a bit of common sense would be nice
Arsenal have spent more in the last 3 years years, you are using data going back to 2006. If you went back to 2001, Arsenal would have spent more
Stop cherry picking
no, not hey wouldnt you fool.
Chamakh did not cost a penny.
Arsenal have a higher wage bill than Barca and Real combined.
If we include wages, Arsenal have spent 3 times as much as Spurs since the start of the Premier League
stop making excuses RC. arsenal have been better than spurs for decades, a few million here or here would not change that. you are above us now we got rid of our 2 best players so i give you my . well done. if THFC was a dog i'd tickle its belly
Gav, congratulations on passing through the FA Cup smoothly
Yernited have no need to bother turning up
ifTHFC was a dog i'd tickle its belly
Doovdé rolls over.
Arsenal have a higher wage bill than Barca and Real combined.
===
i find that hard to believe.
Excuses for what?
We have won a trophy in the last 6 years
If we include wages, Arsenal have spent 3 times as much as Spurs since the start of the Premier League
===
i think winning said league 3 times (throw in a cfew fa cups) earns you the right to splash the cash don't you?
So you are no longer disputing Arsenal have spent more than Spurs
Winning the league 3 times in a row
You are starting to sound like Liverpool fans
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html
here's a record of money spent since 1992 by the way . it shows spurs have a net spend of 150 million more than the arsenal.
hahahhah that proves you wrong also!! LOL!
Its not taking into account wages
Get over it!
Arsenal wage bill = £124.4
Tottenham wage bill is about 70 million
About a 50 million a season difference
'Its not taking into account wages'
===
you have a net spend of 150 million more. am i not writing english here?
'Get over it'!
===
nothing for me to get over. your excuse for winning 4uck all was the fact arsenal spent more than you. now you've been proved wrong.
and that is just this year. you have been proven so wwrong op! stop commenting and making even more a fool of yourself
we didnt pay 10m for chamakh. he was free.
when a player wants to leave we tend to agree to it because it wouldnt be fair and right if we didnt. we dont like to make our players think they're slaves
there is no such thing as a one man team. if you take gervinho ramsey and walcott out of arsenal then rvp wouldnt have got a quarter of his goals.
heres another few stats
you havent finished above us in over 15 years
in 2005/6 you were 9 points ahead of us at one point and still didnt finish above us dont use that petty food poisoning excuse
modric doesnt want to play for you and eventually your corrupt owner will be forced to sell him
Lol, I was just joining to provoke a WUM war, but Ramsey and RVPM appear to have taken the bait
Keep at it RC, see how far they back up
Sign in if you want to comment
ARSENAL V SPURS ULTIMATE STAT ATTACK
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 4/12/11
He doesn't seem to realise the table measures the difference between outgoing transfers and incoming transfers. Arsenal have paid a strong profit in this regard, like all selling clubs! Which makes the fact they have twice as much net debt as Spurs very amusing
posted on 4/12/11
it does not say stoke and villa have spent more than united. if you read the table carefully, the rankings are based on 'average money spent per season'.
posted on 4/12/11
Too many people laughing at their own comments...........
posted on 4/12/11
it shows that we are amazing in the transfer market.
it says united have spent 217m
stoke 72
villa 168
but the table is set up on money made/loss over the years. it shows united sold 160
stoke 11
villa 100
overall, united lose less than them two a year.
a bit of common sense would be nice
posted on 4/12/11
Arsenal have spent more in the last 3 years years, you are using data going back to 2006. If you went back to 2001, Arsenal would have spent more
Stop cherry picking
posted on 4/12/11
no, not hey wouldnt you fool.
posted on 4/12/11
Chamakh did not cost a penny.
posted on 4/12/11
Arsenal have a higher wage bill than Barca and Real combined.
posted on 4/12/11
If we include wages, Arsenal have spent 3 times as much as Spurs since the start of the Premier League
posted on 4/12/11
stop making excuses RC. arsenal have been better than spurs for decades, a few million here or here would not change that. you are above us now we got rid of our 2 best players so i give you my . well done. if THFC was a dog i'd tickle its belly
posted on 4/12/11
Gav, congratulations on passing through the FA Cup smoothly
Yernited have no need to bother turning up
posted on 4/12/11
ifTHFC was a dog i'd tickle its belly
Doovdé rolls over.
posted on 4/12/11
Arsenal have a higher wage bill than Barca and Real combined.
===
i find that hard to believe.
posted on 4/12/11
Excuses for what?
We have won a trophy in the last 6 years
posted on 4/12/11
It's true.
posted on 4/12/11
If we include wages, Arsenal have spent 3 times as much as Spurs since the start of the Premier League
===
i think winning said league 3 times (throw in a cfew fa cups) earns you the right to splash the cash don't you?
posted on 4/12/11
So you are no longer disputing Arsenal have spent more than Spurs
Winning the league 3 times in a row
You are starting to sound like Liverpool fans
posted on 4/12/11
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html
here's a record of money spent since 1992 by the way . it shows spurs have a net spend of 150 million more than the arsenal.
posted on 4/12/11
hahahhah that proves you wrong also!! LOL!
posted on 4/12/11
Its not taking into account wages
Get over it!
posted on 4/12/11
Arsenal wage bill = £124.4
Tottenham wage bill is about 70 million
About a 50 million a season difference
posted on 4/12/11
'Its not taking into account wages'
===
you have a net spend of 150 million more. am i not writing english here?
'Get over it'!
===
nothing for me to get over. your excuse for winning 4uck all was the fact arsenal spent more than you. now you've been proved wrong.
posted on 4/12/11
and that is just this year. you have been proven so wwrong op! stop commenting and making even more a fool of yourself
posted on 4/12/11
we didnt pay 10m for chamakh. he was free.
when a player wants to leave we tend to agree to it because it wouldnt be fair and right if we didnt. we dont like to make our players think they're slaves
there is no such thing as a one man team. if you take gervinho ramsey and walcott out of arsenal then rvp wouldnt have got a quarter of his goals.
heres another few stats
you havent finished above us in over 15 years
in 2005/6 you were 9 points ahead of us at one point and still didnt finish above us dont use that petty food poisoning excuse
modric doesnt want to play for you and eventually your corrupt owner will be forced to sell him
posted on 4/12/11
Lol, I was just joining to provoke a WUM war, but Ramsey and RVPM appear to have taken the bait
Keep at it RC, see how far they back up
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9