I have a spare 25p if it helps?

At 6ft he would combine well with Carroll or Suarez.
==================================

No need need to waste £25m pounds when a perfectly good coat hanger would work well with Carroll.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I have seen him twice, he's very very quick, not the most technical but he importantly does stick his chances away, he scored three in the two games i saw. (reminds me a bit like Darren Bent but that he try's to involve himself in the game and build up play). Interesting transfer if it were to happen.

I'm sure that I could put a montage together that would make us want you to buy Andy Carroll!

why don't we go for chelsea's spanish bloke ?

Chelsea's spanish bloke...you mean Juan Mata???

Chelsea have a Spanish striker? Never seen him play for them. I guess he must be on the bench or something? If so then he can't be very good.

He was good against Scotland.

But then we're not good. At all.

tns would look against Scotland, hold on, didn't they change their name or something?

He is good especially attack set up and finishing.

So that would be £85m spent of strikers

Devon. That is a lot of cash, but its not 85m net is it? Its 35m net, or if you add Torres original fee, its around 57m net. Not ridiculous for 3 strikers really is it? Plus you can't argue that we've missed loads of chances, so what would you want your team to do, keep what you have and hope they start scoring, or get another striker in and give yourselves more options?

We got Carroll and Suarez with the money from Babel and Torres and cut our wage bill in doing so by 3 million a year just by that switcharoo.

So over the 5 years contracts of having Suarez and Carroll instead of Torres/Babel we would save 15 million in wages.