IDK its a hard decision to make. He is getting the team to play well, but all that fandango in the middle of the pitch counts for nothing when we get into the final third and then eventually let in a goal at the other end.
Should we keep him? I say give him til boxing day and if we loose to peterborough then maybe we should think about a change.
But then who do we get, as this decision will decide if we get relegated or not? I know who id say and you all know who id say as whether you like it or not we are in exactly the same position as 3 years ago even worse in fact I think this time around.
So as I said 2 games to survive otherwise I hope the board swallow their pride for the sake of the club otherwise we will be in L1!
Plus one more thing it wouldn't cost us anything and he is still on the wage bill
Because the Worzels aren't currently recruiting and it would be unfair to sack him, what with it being Xmas n'all
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Well life throws up lots of surprises, especially from Derby!
Remember the new predator in Derby, the clothes horse?!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Epic banter guys, enjoyed it ,
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Nice one Ray
Like the civilized used word of "deposit" as well instead of a more common word to describe the "deposit"!
Someone has pointed out that the team are playing well but not scoring and then suggested that we sack him in tow games. Why? Because when you sack a manager your strikers learn to score goals? FFS.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I would laugh but its true
So that's a no then.
No one can give me one good reason why Steve Cotterills a good manager.
So that's a no then.
No one can give me one good reason why Steve Cotterills a good manager.
--------------------------------------
Because he has a better career win% than our last manager. Will that do?
ooops I forgot about McClaren being here!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
We are where we are, at least give him a chance
____________
I'm sick of hearing give him a chance.
Why does he deserve one? Why is he the right man? What in his career so far suggests there's a chance he'll do a good job?
Go and give him a chance at some other club, let him take them and their decent squad of NPC players down.
He's a bad manager. I've had plenty of give him a chances, plenty of get behind hims.
No he's a good manager because...
He's useless. We all knew it before he came, no one wanted him.
The decision to appoint him is one of the worst we've ever made.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Only time will tell, but I think his appointment will not turn out to be as bad as McLaren, Megson, Kinnear, or Pratt. He may be better than Calderwood.
Because he did a reasonable job at Pompey on a shoestring budget (like ours), he's eager to succeed, he is significantly better than our last manager, he's only been in charge for 10 games, numerous players have been injured during his BRIEF tenure as manager, it would cost the club money to sack him when there is no money available and finally, he doesn't spend all his time whinging about the lack of transfer funds available to him (unlike one of our previous managers whom I shall not name!)
I know, why don't we also demand the sacking of Frank Clark while we're at it because he wanted to employ SC and we're not top of the league yet!?
Because he did a reasonable job at Pompey on a shoestring budget (like ours),
________
He was close to the sack. Pompey fans wanted him out. He hasn't got a small budget at forest. NDs pumping £11m in
________
he is significantly better than our last manager
________
Don't be silly. On what basis is he better?
__________
he doesn't spend all his time whinging about the lack of transfer funds
___________
Strange that, because I believe he's called for ND to put mire money in a few times.
_____________
I know, why don't we also demand the sacking of Frank Clark while we're at it because he wanted to employ SC and we're not top of the league yet!?
_________
That would be unfair. We have no right to be top of the league. After two top six finishes we shouldn't be bottom 3
Sutton you won't get any more money to spend on players, the manager has got to fund any new acquisitions by shipping players out, so where do you think you are going to get the money to pay off SC's contract?
You wanted rid of ND and you will find out just how much doo doo you really are in as a club!
he is significantly better than our last manager
________
Don't be silly. On what basis is he better?
---------------------------
How stupid are you sutton?
McClaren was woeful ... Jees
You wanted him out! FFS!
Cstander
We have some complete numpties as fans.
They really think we still have funding available. He'll be whinging when we don't bring anyone in during January
Sign in if you want to comment
Steve Cotterill
Page 1 of 2
posted on 12/12/11
IDK its a hard decision to make. He is getting the team to play well, but all that fandango in the middle of the pitch counts for nothing when we get into the final third and then eventually let in a goal at the other end.
Should we keep him? I say give him til boxing day and if we loose to peterborough then maybe we should think about a change.
But then who do we get, as this decision will decide if we get relegated or not? I know who id say and you all know who id say as whether you like it or not we are in exactly the same position as 3 years ago even worse in fact I think this time around.
So as I said 2 games to survive otherwise I hope the board swallow their pride for the sake of the club otherwise we will be in L1!
posted on 12/12/11
Plus one more thing it wouldn't cost us anything and he is still on the wage bill
posted on 12/12/11
Because the Worzels aren't currently recruiting and it would be unfair to sack him, what with it being Xmas n'all
posted on 12/12/11
CC went on boxing day!
posted on 12/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/12/11
Well life throws up lots of surprises, especially from Derby!
Remember the new predator in Derby, the clothes horse?!
posted on 12/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/12/11
Epic banter guys, enjoyed it ,
posted on 12/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/12/11
Nice one Ray
Like the civilized used word of "deposit" as well instead of a more common word to describe the "deposit"!
posted on 12/12/11
Someone has pointed out that the team are playing well but not scoring and then suggested that we sack him in tow games. Why? Because when you sack a manager your strikers learn to score goals? FFS.
posted on 12/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/12/11
I would laugh but its true
posted on 12/12/11
So that's a no then.
No one can give me one good reason why Steve Cotterills a good manager.
posted on 13/12/11
So that's a no then.
No one can give me one good reason why Steve Cotterills a good manager.
--------------------------------------
Because he has a better career win% than our last manager. Will that do?
posted on 13/12/11
ooops I forgot about McClaren being here!
posted on 13/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 13/12/11
We are where we are, at least give him a chance
____________
I'm sick of hearing give him a chance.
Why does he deserve one? Why is he the right man? What in his career so far suggests there's a chance he'll do a good job?
Go and give him a chance at some other club, let him take them and their decent squad of NPC players down.
He's a bad manager. I've had plenty of give him a chances, plenty of get behind hims.
No he's a good manager because...
He's useless. We all knew it before he came, no one wanted him.
The decision to appoint him is one of the worst we've ever made.
posted on 13/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 13/12/11
Only time will tell, but I think his appointment will not turn out to be as bad as McLaren, Megson, Kinnear, or Pratt. He may be better than Calderwood.
posted on 13/12/11
Because he did a reasonable job at Pompey on a shoestring budget (like ours), he's eager to succeed, he is significantly better than our last manager, he's only been in charge for 10 games, numerous players have been injured during his BRIEF tenure as manager, it would cost the club money to sack him when there is no money available and finally, he doesn't spend all his time whinging about the lack of transfer funds available to him (unlike one of our previous managers whom I shall not name!)
I know, why don't we also demand the sacking of Frank Clark while we're at it because he wanted to employ SC and we're not top of the league yet!?
posted on 13/12/11
Because he did a reasonable job at Pompey on a shoestring budget (like ours),
________
He was close to the sack. Pompey fans wanted him out. He hasn't got a small budget at forest. NDs pumping £11m in
________
he is significantly better than our last manager
________
Don't be silly. On what basis is he better?
__________
he doesn't spend all his time whinging about the lack of transfer funds
___________
Strange that, because I believe he's called for ND to put mire money in a few times.
_____________
I know, why don't we also demand the sacking of Frank Clark while we're at it because he wanted to employ SC and we're not top of the league yet!?
_________
That would be unfair. We have no right to be top of the league. After two top six finishes we shouldn't be bottom 3
posted on 14/12/11
Sutton you won't get any more money to spend on players, the manager has got to fund any new acquisitions by shipping players out, so where do you think you are going to get the money to pay off SC's contract?
You wanted rid of ND and you will find out just how much doo doo you really are in as a club!
posted on 14/12/11
he is significantly better than our last manager
________
Don't be silly. On what basis is he better?
---------------------------
How stupid are you sutton?
McClaren was woeful ... Jees
You wanted him out! FFS!
posted on 14/12/11
Cstander
We have some complete numpties as fans.
They really think we still have funding available. He'll be whinging when we don't bring anyone in during January
Page 1 of 2