My new rule would be, if you're onside & you score a goal, it should be given as a goal.
ive given this extremly poor effort 1 star.
" could do better"
My new rule would be 2 balls in play at all time, and the team getting beat gets to use their hands.
My new rule will come from Grassroots Football: The goalkeeper is allowed to talk to some random man with a dog when the ball is in the opposition's half.
mancWoohoo,
And the random man must ask what the score is & to which team, not that he's bothered either way.
I like it Chicken.... you got Sepp's mobile?
this is why i hate tottenham
Surely a better new rule would be for teams like Spurs not to travel to places like Stoke.
We all know Spurs have a soft under belly and can´t hack it in these type of games, so just book the game as a loss and save on CO2 omissions.
Juan,
"Hate" is a strong word, fella.
My rule: Spurs should never be allowed to play football at a pro level.
Nice to see the Channel 5 clubs sticking up for each other
Check Dr Carneiro out, with his bitchy reply.
Oooooooooooooooooooo...someone's tired
Hey, its all pantomime really isn't it Chicken. He's behind you etc.
Oh yes he is... with a brown paper bag full of ca$h Mr. Inland Revenue Customs and Excise.
Oh yes he is... with a brown paper bag full of ca$h Mr. Inland Revenue Customs and Excise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Run Arry run !!
What kind of two-bob nonce watches ice hockey?
What kind of two-bob nonce watches ice hockey?
--------------------------------
Head out on to the ice and have a go, you'll sheite yourself!
As for the idea from the OP, does this mean we won't have offside anymore?
The man would be offside. the opposing defenders could just stand slightly in their attacking half and the guy would always be offside and it would be much harder to mount an attcka than if the attacker could stand just inside his own half.
Stupid idea
Wouldnt mind but the funniest thing is - we didnt play 10 behind the ball boring football - wondering which match the OP watched?
"What kind of two-bob nonce watches ice hockey?"
<Laugh out loud and make yourself look stupid in front of the admin girl smiley>
Comment of the day
comment by Simon West (U1830) posted 1 day, 1 hour ago
Wouldnt mind but the funniest thing is - we didnt play 10 behind the ball boring football - wondering which match the OP watched?
- - -
You are right....it was 11 behind the ball!
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
New Football Rule
Page 1 of 1
posted on 14/12/11
My new rule would be, if you're onside & you score a goal, it should be given as a goal.
posted on 14/12/11
ive given this extremly poor effort 1 star.
" could do better"
posted on 14/12/11
My new rule would be 2 balls in play at all time, and the team getting beat gets to use their hands.
posted on 14/12/11
My new rule will come from Grassroots Football: The goalkeeper is allowed to talk to some random man with a dog when the ball is in the opposition's half.
posted on 14/12/11
mancWoohoo,
And the random man must ask what the score is & to which team, not that he's bothered either way.
posted on 14/12/11
I like it Chicken.... you got Sepp's mobile?
posted on 14/12/11
this is why i hate tottenham
posted on 14/12/11
Surely a better new rule would be for teams like Spurs not to travel to places like Stoke.
We all know Spurs have a soft under belly and can´t hack it in these type of games, so just book the game as a loss and save on CO2 omissions.
posted on 14/12/11
Juan,
"Hate" is a strong word, fella.
posted on 14/12/11
My rule: Spurs should never be allowed to play football at a pro level.
posted on 14/12/11
Nice to see the Channel 5 clubs sticking up for each other
posted on 14/12/11
Check Dr Carneiro out, with his bitchy reply.
Oooooooooooooooooooo...someone's tired
posted on 14/12/11
Hey, its all pantomime really isn't it Chicken. He's behind you etc.
posted on 14/12/11
Oh no he isnt!
posted on 14/12/11
Oh yes he is... with a brown paper bag full of ca$h Mr. Inland Revenue Customs and Excise.
posted on 14/12/11
Oh yes he is... with a brown paper bag full of ca$h Mr. Inland Revenue Customs and Excise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Run Arry run !!
posted on 14/12/11
What kind of two-bob nonce watches ice hockey?
posted on 14/12/11
What kind of two-bob nonce watches ice hockey?
--------------------------------
Head out on to the ice and have a go, you'll sheite yourself!
As for the idea from the OP, does this mean we won't have offside anymore?
posted on 14/12/11
The man would be offside. the opposing defenders could just stand slightly in their attacking half and the guy would always be offside and it would be much harder to mount an attcka than if the attacker could stand just inside his own half.
Stupid idea
posted on 14/12/11
Wouldnt mind but the funniest thing is - we didnt play 10 behind the ball boring football - wondering which match the OP watched?
posted on 14/12/11
"What kind of two-bob nonce watches ice hockey?"
<Laugh out loud and make yourself look stupid in front of the admin girl smiley>
Comment of the day
posted on 15/12/11
comment by Simon West (U1830) posted 1 day, 1 hour ago
Wouldnt mind but the funniest thing is - we didnt play 10 behind the ball boring football - wondering which match the OP watched?
- - -
You are right....it was 11 behind the ball!
Page 1 of 1