Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Top ten:

1. Tendulkar
2. Bradman
3. Kallis
4. Dravid
5. Lara
6. Sobers
7. Border
8. Gavaskar
9. S Waugh
10. Miandad

List seems like of ones who were better for the game rather than better at it.
I am not getting into any debates as to who was better, because an average of 100 will most likely flatten all my arguments, but I hope people don't confuse greater with better here.

Alistair cook>Bradman>Tendulkar FACT!

another indyan user eh

Bradman
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
further still
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
everyone else

Comment deleted by Article Creator

....I spotted this article a few days ago and thought will I, or won't I send it to this site and whinde up these poor Indian supporters again in regards to the great Bradman....
The same went for when OZ were No.1 all those years and India couldn't reach them until 3-4 players retired they were saying then the point scoring system was wrong and in favour of OZ.......so it matters not what the facts are this mob whinge regardless of a little thing like facts...
It is truly hillarious reading some of there comments..

HAHA, ok.

What was his great statistical system? Modern batsman's runs are worth 2x Bradman's?

To counteract the notion that test runs are worth more now, then bowlers averages in the past must be valued a lot more than now.

The OP is a donkey! Merry Christmas one & all, can't wait for tonight, i've already had a kip in preparation!