"Sangakarra - yes he is on form and playing well, but I have to take into account the opposition. "
Oh apologies he has only scored centuaries against England in England and South Africa in South Africa and not to mention is one man reaguard against Pak in UAE.
Kash on another note - would you say Khan is a flat track bully, looking at the findings above??
Khan who averages over 50 in England and NZ, over 40 in Aus with SA room for improvement in 2012. Hardly a FTB unlike Shewag.
"Silly idiot"
This is a result of SMS ok Shankar.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
So that nullifies you questioning when players hit centuries yes??
Not really as he has not been as prolific as Dravid, Sanga and Khan. When you score a ton you get more ranking points than a 50 so if you have not scored a ton for a while then your current form is not as good as it was. He might score one tonight and then its a different story.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Neon read my post mate. The term "Could be" clearly shows that I did not regard him as the best but more the potential to be the best.
But in terms of current form which number 4 would get in the sub cont team (if there was one) Khan or Sachin, well Khan wins that debate.
Only a pak fan would pick Khan over Sachin. And only those with severely damaged brains.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
"Sorry Kash - Maybe lack of sleep, or your going round in circles."
give it a rest Neon. This whole post is regards to current form and nothing more. It's actually quite simple really.
Kash, these guys have trouble understanding the fact that DRS pros outweight the cons with a ratio 1 to 10.... Do you really think they can read and digest your article on stats and averages based on 2011..... Think you being a tad harsh mate, you need to simplify it for these folks.
Afridi I tried my best but i give up.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
To be honest, Khan atleast needs another excellent year to be considered as good as Sanga, Sachin & co.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
neon.....I did have a chuckle when I read your comment that had the phrase (lethal attack) in the same sentence as England...
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Neon u will always be my kutti on JA606. Good try though.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Sangakarra best batsman from Sub Cont?
Page 2 of 3
posted on 28/12/11
"Sangakarra - yes he is on form and playing well, but I have to take into account the opposition. "
Oh apologies he has only scored centuaries against England in England and South Africa in South Africa and not to mention is one man reaguard against Pak in UAE.
posted on 28/12/11
Kash on another note - would you say Khan is a flat track bully, looking at the findings above??
Khan who averages over 50 in England and NZ, over 40 in Aus with SA room for improvement in 2012. Hardly a FTB unlike Shewag.
posted on 28/12/11
"Silly idiot"
This is a result of SMS ok Shankar.
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
So that nullifies you questioning when players hit centuries yes??
Not really as he has not been as prolific as Dravid, Sanga and Khan. When you score a ton you get more ranking points than a 50 so if you have not scored a ton for a while then your current form is not as good as it was. He might score one tonight and then its a different story.
posted on 28/12/11
NM.
Regards,
Afridi14
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
Neon read my post mate. The term "Could be" clearly shows that I did not regard him as the best but more the potential to be the best.
But in terms of current form which number 4 would get in the sub cont team (if there was one) Khan or Sachin, well Khan wins that debate.
posted on 28/12/11
Only a pak fan would pick Khan over Sachin. And only those with severely damaged brains.
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
"Sorry Kash - Maybe lack of sleep, or your going round in circles."
give it a rest Neon. This whole post is regards to current form and nothing more. It's actually quite simple really.
posted on 28/12/11
Kash, these guys have trouble understanding the fact that DRS pros outweight the cons with a ratio 1 to 10.... Do you really think they can read and digest your article on stats and averages based on 2011..... Think you being a tad harsh mate, you need to simplify it for these folks.
posted on 28/12/11
Afridi I tried my best but i give up.
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
To be honest, Khan atleast needs another excellent year to be considered as good as Sanga, Sachin & co.
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
neon.....I did have a chuckle when I read your comment that had the phrase (lethal attack) in the same sentence as England...
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/11
Neon u will always be my kutti on JA606. Good try though.
posted on 28/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 2 of 3