Ask the same to Kakta, Josh and Kevin
Because he wasn't good as doncaster, so why should he be in our team now? Send him on loan and see how he does.
Don't forget we got Bamford now!
He is a centre forward and we do not need another one. We cannot feed 5 balls all game to a world-class striker we have, it would not change with Lalkovic
I think Bamford was bought more for the reserves than the first team TBH
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Lalkovic
Page 1 of 1
posted on 31/1/12
Ask the same to Kakta, Josh and Kevin
posted on 31/1/12
Because he wasn't good as doncaster, so why should he be in our team now? Send him on loan and see how he does.
Don't forget we got Bamford now!
posted on 31/1/12
Kevin??
posted on 31/1/12
He is a centre forward and we do not need another one. We cannot feed 5 balls all game to a world-class striker we have, it would not change with Lalkovic
posted on 31/1/12
I think Bamford was bought more for the reserves than the first team TBH
Page 1 of 1