To start with, article has flaws.

He mentioned Brana for fouling Evra when it was actually Sturridge so nonsense reporter.

I dunno

I never read him normally as he just spouts bile about Chelsea at every opportunity

Chelsea were outplayed and lucky not to lose.
They were penalties, but obviously you'll agree with the ones that see it different.
I'll do the same and agree with the ones that say it was a pen.
And a little justice against the morons booing rio...

Mick Dennis reviews are often cluttered with incorrect accounts involving the wrong players names - hence another detritus of the actual events.

He is the lowest paid Sky Sports headline reviewer for a reason. Despite his papers proposed right of centre reviews, Dennis applies amoebalike socialist comment on his justice/injustice reviews. He is a Sunday League referee...enough said.

Stercus

I have no idea if all that is factually correct - but it sounds good