or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 17 comments are related to an article called:

Theo Walcott or Gareth Bale

Page 1 of 1

posted on 25/2/12

Titus Bramble.

posted on 25/2/12

Pointless article, will be full of wums

The whole world knows Bale is playing ten times better than Walcott

Walcott is a poor mans lennon

posted on 25/2/12

Walcott is a poor mans Walcott.

Walcott is so bad that he is actually worse than himself

posted on 25/2/12

AOC is better (bet you didnt see that one coming)

posted on 25/2/12

earlier i saw an interview with bale on sky sports news.

the first thing i thought was

"f&ck me, a talking chimp!"

posted on 25/2/12

must be related to Keown then

posted on 25/2/12

Koscielny Patented Proof Readers

______________________________________

And you of course are a clone of George Clooney!

posted on 25/2/12

""f&ck me, a talking chimp!""

hahahahahahaha

posted on 25/2/12

inb4heskey

posted on 25/2/12

Theo Walcott is the next Henry.

Except that he'll be a Championship version, with the rest of the Arsenal future "stars"

posted on 25/2/12

Walcott

posted on 25/2/12

And you of course are a clone of George Clooney!
==========
oh yes. i'm hotter than the pile of burning bank statements in 'Arry's fireplace.

posted on 25/2/12

oh yes. i'm hotter than the pile of burning bank statements in 'Arry's fireplace.

posted on 25/2/12

What is a Walcott?

posted on 25/2/12

Bale is good but a little overrated, Walcott is just poor, neither of them as good as Valencia.

posted on 25/2/12

Valencia is only good for oranges

posted on 26/2/12

funny how the game went for these players, the better player (bale) resorted to diving, the other focused on his game and became the scorer.

Bale is better, but walcott is dangerous, both are young enough to improve but both rely on the team for distribution.

Plus if Bale's reputation for diving continues to grow it will not help his performances

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment