Comment deleted by Site Moderator
What rollucks is our man from the west country going to give us after this shambles of a preformance ?
Couldn't understand why many got carried away after a poor home performance against Coventry and a good win over Birmingham. Tonight was rather telling for those who argued that 'improvements' were down to Cotterill finally being able to mould his own team.
Showed his hand. Predictable, poor and lacking in any real direction.
Alright Rev
They'll be plenty of other nights like this if Clark doesn't sort it out. I just cant understand why he can't see what's seems obvious to me.
Yes Cotterill improved things slighty. But from the low he took us to that wasn't hard. Ultimately he's a bad manager. A bad manager equals bad performances and results. So this is what we'll get while we employ him.
Typhoon Tyson is approaching on the radar though
With plenty of Theo Thunder with it
With just a Drizzle of Davo
Sounds like you lot are a bit wet then.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
It's pretty clear that the anti SC views by the likes of Sutton and Rev seem to be more right than wrong, at the moment. SC is definitely struggling and does not seem to be getting the best out of his (talented) players on any consistent basis. They shouldn't be criticised for these anti SC views, their opinion is as valid as anyones.
However, I think the criticism of these two have often been due to the fact that Rev, in particular, has normally followed a poor performance with an anti SC thread, almost before the last ball has been kicked, yet when there has been a good performance he is relatively conspicuous by his absence.
This is almost like the political party in opposition, of whatever persuasion, as they will rarely admit when the sitting party get something right, but are quick to criticise anything that goes wrong. Personally, I think it devalues their overall opinions as it is clearly not balanced or reasoned.
Increasingly, I think that anti SC posters should be heard, but they shouldn't get so upset when others point out that they tend to hide when things look better.
By definition, lets hope that things do improve so that we hear less and less of these views, as I am sure they would prefer SC succeeds keeps us up rather than fail and take us down.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Shame he had to go back to his calamity tactics last night again, instead of using a winning formula!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Where are....
Page 1 of 1
posted on 6/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/3/12
What rollucks is our man from the west country going to give us after this shambles of a preformance ?
posted on 6/3/12
Couldn't understand why many got carried away after a poor home performance against Coventry and a good win over Birmingham. Tonight was rather telling for those who argued that 'improvements' were down to Cotterill finally being able to mould his own team.
Showed his hand. Predictable, poor and lacking in any real direction.
posted on 6/3/12
Alright Rev
They'll be plenty of other nights like this if Clark doesn't sort it out. I just cant understand why he can't see what's seems obvious to me.
Yes Cotterill improved things slighty. But from the low he took us to that wasn't hard. Ultimately he's a bad manager. A bad manager equals bad performances and results. So this is what we'll get while we employ him.
posted on 6/3/12
One week to go
posted on 6/3/12
No Snow on the forecast.
posted on 6/3/12
Typhoon Tyson is approaching on the radar though
posted on 6/3/12
With plenty of Theo Thunder with it
posted on 6/3/12
With just a Drizzle of Davo
posted on 6/3/12
Sounds like you lot are a bit wet then.
posted on 7/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/3/12
It's pretty clear that the anti SC views by the likes of Sutton and Rev seem to be more right than wrong, at the moment. SC is definitely struggling and does not seem to be getting the best out of his (talented) players on any consistent basis. They shouldn't be criticised for these anti SC views, their opinion is as valid as anyones.
However, I think the criticism of these two have often been due to the fact that Rev, in particular, has normally followed a poor performance with an anti SC thread, almost before the last ball has been kicked, yet when there has been a good performance he is relatively conspicuous by his absence.
This is almost like the political party in opposition, of whatever persuasion, as they will rarely admit when the sitting party get something right, but are quick to criticise anything that goes wrong. Personally, I think it devalues their overall opinions as it is clearly not balanced or reasoned.
Increasingly, I think that anti SC posters should be heard, but they shouldn't get so upset when others point out that they tend to hide when things look better.
By definition, lets hope that things do improve so that we hear less and less of these views, as I am sure they would prefer SC succeeds keeps us up rather than fail and take us down.
posted on 7/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/3/12
Shame he had to go back to his calamity tactics last night again, instead of using a winning formula!
posted on 7/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1