or to join or start a new Discussion

Browse: Football  Leicester City  Championship 
6 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Hume v Dickov

by silvermonopoly (U3876)

Who was better from the 2 when they were at their best for City?

posted on 22/5/11

Hume and Dickov were both 100 percent commited, but Dickov was much more clinical striker.

Hume had his moments but he was just never consistent enough in front of goal.

posted on 22/5/11

Considering Dickov was a 20+ goal a season man and Hume barely scraped 10.

posted on 22/5/11

Hume v Dickov, no contest try again.

posted on 22/5/11

Dickov without a doubt but you could never doubt Hume's commitment, only his consistency.

posted on 22/5/11

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Jobyfox (U4183)

posted on 23/5/11

Hume was a real trier, which is why he was a fans favourite and ............ overrated!

Dickov, at his best, was a Premier League player whereas Hume has never looked like reaching those heights.

View all 6 comments  |  Back to Top
Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available