Hume and Dickov were both 100 percent commited, but Dickov was much more clinical striker.
Hume had his moments but he was just never consistent enough in front of goal.
Considering Dickov was a 20+ goal a season man and Hume barely scraped 10.
Hume v Dickov, no contest try again.
Dickov without a doubt but you could never doubt Hume's commitment, only his consistency.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Hume was a real trier, which is why he was a fans favourite and ............ overrated!
Dickov, at his best, was a Premier League player whereas Hume has never looked like reaching those heights.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Hume v Dickov
Page 1 of 1
posted on 22/5/11
Hume and Dickov were both 100 percent commited, but Dickov was much more clinical striker.
Hume had his moments but he was just never consistent enough in front of goal.
posted on 22/5/11
Considering Dickov was a 20+ goal a season man and Hume barely scraped 10.
posted on 22/5/11
Hume v Dickov, no contest try again.
posted on 22/5/11
Dickov without a doubt but you could never doubt Hume's commitment, only his consistency.
posted on 22/5/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/5/11
Hume was a real trier, which is why he was a fans favourite and ............ overrated!
Dickov, at his best, was a Premier League player whereas Hume has never looked like reaching those heights.
Page 1 of 1