Sinclair

Walcott all the way for me

Walcott > Sinclair.

Would much prefer to sign Walcott.

And Downing has a very good footballing brain. He lacks fight is all.

Walcott has no footballing brain but has no fear.

They are yin and yang.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

We should do the same to Shelvey & Henderson

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

I think they'd make a lovely couple

They could get a flat in Brighton

Walcott >>>>>>>> Sinclair. Walcott got 8 league goals and 11 league assists so how can you compare to Downing?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
compared in terms of footballing intelligence, both of these players do not have footballing intelligence.

I did mention that Walcott does get his fair share of goals and assists and Downing got his fair share of goals and assists for A.Villa before he came ti Liverpool.

If Downing plays on the left and was asked to go down the line and cross, then he will do well but as a wide forward there is more responsibility to create and he cannot do that.

I put Walcott in that same bracket because he can run down the line and probably thats all he can do. how many times has his final ball been cr*p.

Walcott is the better player firstly and secondly he would be the better option for us, as he isn't as similar to Sterling as Sinclair is.

Walcott is quite obviously a better option for us.

He is right sided or central for a start, where as Sinclair is left sided or central.

We don't need a primarily left sided player.

Walcott is similar in style to Nathan Dyer who Rodgers had at Swansea, but more productive. I am sure Rodgers would work wonders with Walcott, whereas he has already done about all he can do with Sinclair, who I don't think will improve much in the rest of his career despite being young.