Our target was to win 2 out of every 3 games or 2 points/game.
We are currently achieving 1.22 points/game.
Our adjusted target is now 2.49 points/game.
This means we have to win 5 out of every 6 games until the end of the season.
Sorry!!!
Depressing statistic.
posted on 5/10/12
You mean I'm consistent and usually right?
posted on 5/10/12
HH - I remember RB posting it at the time and thought fair do's. I accepted the fact RB supported Megson after he wrote it.
So what has changed. Why has he created a thread with a blatant miscalculation in it just to slate OC.
Why not support the incumbent? I am very much following RB's wise stance of 2009!!!!
posted on 5/10/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 5/10/12
CEF
Done weeks 8&9.
Couldn't always get wifi in Mallorca.. Home now..
posted on 5/10/12
MT - it not really dangerous. The quote is in context and is on the person's thread.
Yes I was confident we would stay up, so have no issue with your reminder ( like I need reminding I was wrong!)
I'll support the team on Saturday with just the same passion as I supported them in 1975 and every game in between. Players and managers come and go. BWFC and I remain constant!!
posted on 5/10/12
"I'll support the team on Saturday with just the same passion as I supported them in 1975 and every game in between. Players and managers come and go. BWFC and I remain constant!!"
That's fine, and that's the minimum requirement to be honest..
It's the love and passion that makes it hurt when you see a club drop like a stone..
Smiling and wearing shorts doesn't hide the fact that we are in a mess. Managers come and go like like you said... Lets see then...
posted on 5/10/12
I go way beyond the minimum requirements with regards BWFC.
The time and money i've spent and the sacrifices i've made to watch has been worth it.
The game of football and BWFC in particular have given me some of the greatest moments.
posted on 5/10/12
CEF.
We all know what you heard and fully believe that Coyle will get to 20 games no matter what. I still don't understand why that stops you saying what you, personally, would like to see happen?
A government is elected every 5 years and there's nothing that can be done 'til the next election. That doesn't stop people complaining and campaigning for change.
And, why do you dismiss Bricks' 2 points a game quote when it came from the same mouth as your 20 games for Coyle? Whether we need that many points a game is surely irrelevant, Gartside said it so therefore it's gospel.
posted on 5/10/12
WATOAOW - I do not dismiss Brick's 2 points per game quote from PG. I have seen it myself. All I am saying is that 92 points will prob win title by about 8 points. Basically Garty played it safe with his quote. Easier than saying we need 1.8 pts per game.
I also take issue with an error being pointed out in the first few comments and then no sign of Bricks to correct it. The OP would carry more weight if it was factually correct.
I have stated my personal position over 30 times since the season started.
posted on 5/10/12
Talking about being up early in the morning, when I was working in my own business I was working at 6:00am seven days a week for fourteen years except holidays of course.
You get used to it and it certainly does you no harm. You just have to go to bed earlier. There's only so long you can burn the candle at both ends.