http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2012/11/6/3609980/chelsea-fc-romelu-lukaku-awesome-fernando-torres-poo
posted on 6/11/12
That is better then any game Torres had been involved in this season."
-------------------------
Over 120 minutes?
posted on 6/11/12
The most interesting thing:
Lukaku - Torres
min/touch 2.29 - 2.42
min/shot 18.19 - 49.88
min/shot on target 34.73 - 92.08
In other words, Torres gets the ball about as much as Lukaku does, but takes about 2.7 times longer to take a shot, and takes about 2.6 times longer to get a shot on goal.
This may be because Torres spends a lot of time outside the box, but he could also just be a bit shy about shooting.
posted on 6/11/12
The moral of the story is that we need 2 new strikers
posted on 6/11/12
This is not fair, you're forgetting the magnificent midfield that is supporting Lukaku upfront. These stats are flawed
posted on 6/11/12
Let's recall Lukaku in Jan. Offload Torres and bring in another striker e.g. Llorente, Remy...
posted on 6/11/12
How do stats lie? stats are innocent, its the people that intepret them that are guilty
posted on 6/11/12
Offload Torres and bring in another striker
---------------------------------------------------
Even if we accept a massive loss on the transfer fee, who would be willing or able to pay his massive wages?
Think Anzhi or PSG would take him? Maybe we can get Eto'o in return?
posted on 6/11/12
Athletico would take him if Roman wants to shell out for Falcao.
posted on 6/11/12
And Torres would probably lower his wage demands for them.
posted on 7/11/12
http://www.101greatgoals.com/wp-content/gallery/gimages/1351712790929.gif