What happened to the old adage "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" We have been tried, found guilty and convicted by a 10 out of 12 (Rangers/Kilmarnock excluded) SPL jury before all the facts were made public. Surely there must be some form of redress/compensation for Rangers in this scenario?
posted on 21/11/12
We were guilty as far as what Whyte did.
BUT, the mass hysteria about "cheating" because of the huge amount of publicity the EBT case was given by the media drummed it into fans' heads that that action was the main issue we were being punished for. It wasn't.
The fans outcry was what swayed the chairmen
The chairmen were forced into making a decision on our future by the SPL.
So therefore, one mans actions (Whyte), an idiotic scaremongering media pandering to the fans historical envy and dislike of us, coupled with a weak and incompetent league organiser (the SPl) ruined Rangers.
It fckin stinks.
posted on 21/11/12
I await the opening of the "image rights" case - soon to come
posted on 21/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/11/12
So now that most of the loans were indeed confirmed as loans, I'm assuming all of those players will be posting that money back otherwise that'll be another form of payment that they received.. Which breaks the spl's rules
posted on 21/11/12
There is no date on when the money has to be paid back and can actually be sought from their estate on their death by all accounts if still outstanding.
posted on 21/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/11/12
Pay it back
All of it
Now
====
naw
posted on 21/11/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator