Imagine it was us that signed him instead of Utd, how do you think he would've turned out for us? As good as he has been for Utd? Or even more possible (and frustrating) is that he gets worse??... which seems to be a recurring theme at our club whenever we make a high profile signing upfront.
Could he and Torres be a good partnership? Would he blossom with our quality trio behind him?
What say you...
Van Persie
posted on 27/12/12
apparently falcao has said he wont move in january
posted on 27/12/12
Blue Kenyan I agree
posted on 27/12/12
why would he
athletico are on the up and generally a stable club
i don't think chelsea is much of a step up for him
posted on 27/12/12
Yeah I can see it now, Atletico winning la liga ahead of Barcelona!
posted on 27/12/12
Chelsea would be challenging for the title if they had RVP.
On Falcao, I doubt he'll be leaving in Jan, as I've said to many Chelsea fans that think they'll be signing him, but it's not that unlikely he'll go there in the summer.
Atletico are far from a stable club - they're skint. You could argue that Atletico are a better team than Chelsea, but money talks, and Chelsea have plenty.
posted on 27/12/12
Only thing he has to look forward to with Atletico are good cup runs and maybe a Europa Cup. With him at Chelsea and the supply line behind we would start challenging on all fronts again. Anyway I will take on of Falcao or Cavani, don't mind which one. But it has to be one of them!!
posted on 27/12/12
True. He'd have CL football to look forward to though.
Hopefully he stays in Spain. Chelsea will be a formidable outfit with him in their side.
posted on 27/12/12
Utd would be about 4th/5th and we'd be a few points clear of the top with City behind us!
------------
you do realise he didnt play for us last year
posted on 28/12/12
What a pathetic waste of time this article is. He didn't sign for you, okay? End of story.
posted on 28/12/12