I think 90% of posters on here now want to see a new guy in charge.
A few names banded around, most recently Adkins.
My point is though if we have no money, and don't back the manager, it doesn't matter who we have in charge.
We have spent no where near what a team who's gunning for promotion would spend. Neil's football is terrible, but we're not a in relegation fight. I agree he should go, but we need to give whoever is in charge money to spend.
Adkins would be great, but how well would he do with no cash?
New Manager
posted on 19/1/13
Leeds have spent £1.85m and sold much more! Net spend minus £1.7m
Hull have spent £2.5m
Cardiff - £7.3
Leicester - £4.2
Brighton - 0
Mkaes interstinf reading
posted on 19/1/13
Is it just me, or do those figures not make sense?
posted on 19/1/13
when we have no chance of promotion get a new manager in to prepare for next season
posted on 19/1/13
In what way Sol?
The spent figures are transfers in. The Leeds net figure is after transfers out.
posted on 19/1/13
Brighton have just spent 2m on Leonardo Ulloa
Derby putting in bid for blackstock
How the hell can nw keep up when teams are doing that?
He's done a good job and should be given next season with his money. Adkins got backed there and not there club is not same has ours. Would he really be good? Not sure.
posted on 19/1/13
stoopo,
on phone so haven't looked properly, but first couple of rows the average per season can't be right.
posted on 19/1/13
Going off figures from horsforths link.
posted on 19/1/13
blue, I wouldn't give warnock a penny more
beyond this window. You already have enough dead wood.
posted on 19/1/13
Sol - I'll take another look later.
posted on 19/1/13
The figures are incorrect, if you look at the Leeds only transfers, there is no mention of Gradel coming in from Leicester for 100k, nor his sale to St. Etienne for 1.5m.
Also the season we sold Delph for 6m, we apparently spent 4.7m on nobody.
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiership-transfers/leeds-united-transfers.html