I apologise in having to start a new thread as I really just wanted to add comments to those already on the 'Monster goal from Gregus' topic but unfortunately Largehat as seen it fit to block me from posting on any of his threads.
Anyway this is what I would wish to contribute to the discussion on there.
Admin said - "largehat,our Bolton board is awfully quiet. Any ideas? I'm hoping we didn't make a mistake in letting Bolton nuts, post promotional stuff on here".
and also,
"We are launching a ja606 spin off news site and there are commercial tie ups that should help us expand our reach. Albeit we will end up with ads on here".
Dear Admin, I’m sorry if you are now seemingly regretting giving the Bolton Nuts forum (of which I am one of the founders) a helping hand with a bit of publicity when we first started off.
I personally don’t see any conflict between our sites as we cater for differing tastes, you for those supporters who like to have easy access to and from fans of other teams and we who on the whole are more or less a closed shop for Wanderers fans only.
I am pleased to see the general consensus of opinion is that your early, much appreciated support of ‘Nuts’ is not considered to have been detrimental to this forum. I don’t believe it to have been so either.
I note the comments and opinions of all those who have contributed their thoughts to this discussion and can only say that Bolton Nuts is absolutely thriving with an average of over 1,000 posts weekly, so maybe failure on the pitch may not necessarily the only reason for the decline in posts on here and other Wanderers forums?
Anyway in return for your past support of 'Nuts' on here we would be more than happy to plug your ‘News Site’ on our forum when you get it up and running.
We at Nuts wish you every success with your ‘News’ venture and look forward to the continuation of mutual and cordial support between our two sites.
Dear Admin
posted on 9/2/13
TCT - zzzzzzzzz
I was asked a question - therefore i answered. I only provide figures when people ask. Since I do it regularly, that would suggest you are in a minority.
I'm sure there is plenty that excites you that others find boring. That's human nature.
posted on 9/2/13
So seeing as SKD has played much more than Sordell yet Sordell is better currently. Therefore the same applies to AFL and RVP. I have proved that the use of game time and goals us pointless as it does not prove who was better.
posted on 9/2/13
No you haven't.
How can you compare 118 and 113
with 397 and 118
KD is over 3 times higher than Sordell, whereas there is no real margin between RVP and Le Fondre.
posted on 9/2/13
Course you can. I am only saying stats prove nothing. RVP is better but stats say not. Therefore stats are wrong as you can't be can't as confident as you claim about Sordell
posted on 9/2/13
Lads we all know Kd cant go on forever,would have loved it if he was in a promotion chasing team.The team needs a complete rebooting as this team is embarrassing to us right now.Forget stats for now,I want to see 100% effort,this season has been a right off since August in my opinion maybe May even.
Can DF turn it around? I doubt it!.Although he has identified the dead wood,excpect us to be here for the next five years or so,DF not a chance!.
posted on 9/2/13
Stats prove everything. Remember our most successful modern day manager was the biggest exponent of stats there is.
5 mins difference between two Prem strikers when RVP has played twice the number of mins is nothing. In fact it would suggest RVP is the better striker.
SKD needs more than 3 times longer on the pitch to score as many goals as Sordell. Says it all really!!!!
posted on 9/2/13
5 mins difference between two Prem strikers when RVP has played twice the number of mins is nothing. In fact it would suggest RVP is the better striker.
--
There is far more than 5 mins difference between RVP and ALF
posted on 9/2/13
No - exactly 5 mins - add them up Petrov. Go on - get on match sites and add them all up.
posted on 9/2/13
I am talking ability wise.
posted on 9/2/13
RVP is far better rthan ALF but the stats say no. That's what's wrong with your stats regardless of what you cla they prove nothing.