or to join or start a new Discussion

11 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Lack of chemistry- a problem

1. Any particular player will need a team that plays to his strenghts in order for him to perform at his highest capacity.

2. Any particular crop of players will need a new player who plays (better) to their strenght in order to perform at their highest capacity.

The first assumption has been addressed to Torres in the past by the majority of us, anyways this is not a post about Torres so lets put him aside for once. The focus lies with the second assumption. As it stands one can interprete it as the chemistry among a team. We are going to leave aside aspects of how chemistry is built, develobed and nurtured and rather focus on the effect it has had - the role it has played - in the past and today on the performances of our team.

Honestly, looking at some of our performances I believe our team lacks a lot of chemistry in to many departments. People (the manager and some fans) have been talking about the lack of balance or the missing game-plan. In my opinion this is are just signs of the lack of chemistry within the team.

Looking at most of our games even some we won, I never got the feeling this team plays like they had a particular "intelligent" plan. The word "intelligent" stands for the idea that the team "looks like they know what they are doing". Now there is no collective brain on the field to coordinate each player but rather 11 individual minds and phisical beings. Therefore each one of those 11 minds must have an idea of what the other 10 minds are thinking of - to make that happen is the job of the manager -. But on the other hand each player has his specific attributes, attributes that were good enough to let him become a professional player and therefore should not be doubted. These attributes of the 11 players must match up to - this is again the job of the manager -..

Now here is where I see a particular problem we have had not only this season but for some seasons going. The set of players does not form jet a team ready to rule Europe (the world). In the past - way back when makelele still played - we used to have a crop of players that worked like a well oiled machine. We were decent on the eye - I loved to watch players like Gudjohnson, Robben or J. Cole - and the results and performances were basically flawless. Put short, in my opinion we were for some time with barcelona the best team in the World. Always favourites of winning the one with the big ears. Those days are long gone!

Now we are comparing ourselfes with teams like Tottenham and the Arsenal of today. Now looking at the talent we possesed then and the talent we posses now, inducing the much needed chemistry into the team should produce a hell of a team for the future. But therefore we need the right tinkering. Big signing or not the players we bring in must come with some much needed characteristics.

Improving the chemistry

On the striking departement:

First, any new striker must be a pure goal poacher. One who is blistering fast on the first few meters and therefore enjoys/has no problem moving around in a packed defence with little space (hyper effective in small space). Other than that he should posses a good shot from outside the box and his vision and passing capabilities should be decent enough for him to rack up some assists. Now this is just a short summary of some attributes I believe a striker needs to fullfill both assumptions mentioned above, you are free to add and discuss them.

Reviewing our games - mentally - I see us having two ways of attacking. Either we build up rather slow and with minimum risk, trying to bring the ball in and around the box. Suppose we arrive there we tend to take out the tempo and play the ball from one side to the other trying to find space so the players outside the box can play a one-two - combination - with the striker/ player around the box or slighly in it, and then get a shot. The other way we attack is through fast transitions and counter attack (something most teams have learnt to do in modern football so I wont go to much into this as this will always be a part of any teams game).

On the midfield:

Now I personally would add a Middfielder to the current roaster. One who is very comfortable on the ball. That means he doesn't loose it easy. Mikel fits that bill but he holds on to the ball more through physicall power than rafiness. So the new player should hold on to the ball through his agility and fast thinking rather than physical strenght. On top of that he should be albe to take more risks in his passing while keeping the completion rate high. This would improve our first game-plan as it would enable the other players to settle faster in and around the box and therefore give the opposition less time to adjust their shape. On top of that said player would higher the circulation speed of the ball around the box.

posted on 11/3/13

its a new midfield but you can see how devastating Mata and Hazard are together and i like the way Ba holds it up for those two to play. Our major weakness these days is that we cannot take advantage of set plays like we used to with Drogba Ballack ect

comment by Xiu (U6109)

posted on 11/3/13

You need a defensive organiser and a true holding player. When Terry is missing you have absolutely no communication on the pitch. You need a Kompany but of course, he's not going to Chelsea.

Mikel thinks too slowly to be a good passer of the ball and reacts too slowly and has no positional sense to be anything more than adequate in that position. Ramires is wasted there as he is a much more dangerous runner and participator in attacks than defender - he should be winning the ball further up the field to counter quickly. Our ex player, Romeo, I think is too slow for the premier league - he has no urgency.

posted on 11/3/13

if Terry is fit he should be playing no discussion. Agree on the DM Yaya Toure is the best in the world at the moment but i think Fellani if he comes to Chelsea can challenge him for that role. We need Fellani and Falcao and Jose and we chould be able to win the league

posted on 11/3/13

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Xiu (U6109)

posted on 11/3/13

Just interested to know who would be a good defensive midfielder. Who is there even comparable to Makalele? I mean it is still called the Makalele position, even over here in Spain!!! Yaya could do it but would be wasted there and wouldn't be a consistant as Makalele. I think Fellaini would be a good signing for Chelsea but not as a sitting player, more box to box. Maybe Javi Martinez from Bayern? Not many real high class holding players around these days. As for deep lying play maker, you have David Luiz.

comment by CSTP (U1453)

posted on 11/3/13

Mata and Hazard have a very good understanding between each other.

The true sign of a lack of understanding is by us passing it back and forth in our half and/or playing a long ball as our most common build up strategy.

posted on 11/3/13

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Xiu (U6109)

posted on 11/3/13

I agree with Lucas. Don't think he'd go to Chelsea and he'd cost you too much.

comment by DTM (U8348)

posted on 12/3/13

Not another Pool player?

posted on 12/3/13

AVB is that u?

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available