so it would seem
http://sport.stv.tv/football/
scottish-pr...oodwillie/
Another goodwillie bid
posted on 2/8/11
who knows chaz
posted on 2/8/11
First time around when Cardiff,Blackpool were after him Rangers could have got him for £2m and on 10k p/w. Now they have to pay over the odds for an average player at best.
posted on 2/8/11
How much are yous gonna have to pay now that you've pashed off most of the available keepers in Europe?
posted on 2/8/11
DC- Don't go there! Asked that earlier on today in a civil tone, got shot down big style.
Apparently it's hilarious and permanently embarrassing for Rangers to try to sign a player such as Goodwillie.
There is however no reason to even comment on why 10 weeks after losing Forster Celtic have no replacement nor any in site.
posted on 2/8/11
chaz - if he was EVER available at 2m that is. Blackburn arent paying 2.8m as a goodwill gesture.
posted on 2/8/11
There is however no reason to even comment on why 10 weeks after losing Forster Celtic have no replacement nor any in site.
+++++
We trailed a keeper he failed...
We would have liked to have got Shay Given but weren't in th running...
We made ONE bid for Forster which was refused.
We know when to take a hint
posted on 2/8/11
*trialled
posted on 2/8/11
Whytie valued the player at £1m
Now so why is he now willing to pay £2.8m for him?
It just sums up Rangers transfer policy under whytie
posted on 2/8/11
Here's a hint TCD, zaluska plays in goal for yous next year,you'll lose the league Maybe somebody should drap this hint to Pistol Pete
posted on 2/8/11
chaz - cos thats what blackburn are offering. Not 2m. So if they didnt accept 2m from rovers, then its safe to say rangers wouldnt have got him for 2m.
Like you keep bumbling on that we would have. We wouldnt!