This is a hard article to write, for obvious reasons. In it, I'm going to try and justify all of Microsoft's controversial decisions. I'll then explain a few things about public perception and why Microsoft need to fix up to avoid falling behind.
---------------------------------------------------
People are wondering why Microsoft have included their 'used games' and '24 hour check' systems in the Xbox ONE. Rather than Microsoft just scréwing us over for the sake of it, there's actually sound reasoning behind it.
Something that a lot have people have forgotten is that the difficulty in trading used games on the ONE vs the PS4 will be because Microsoft want to make it so that everyone can just save their games to the console, then never have to use the disc again. This is in comparison to Sony who are continuing the 'traditional way', with discs that the games load off. This, in my opinion, could be a really, really good feature.
Their argument is this is easier for the user (definitely, requires no disc switching) and allows games to run faster (Again, yes). We've seen them proudly show off how you can be playing Ryse one minute and then your friend sends you an invite to another game and you instantly join it, as if it's all part of the same game. This is cool, and I can actually see this being very useful.
However, this obviously causes difficulty, because what's to stop someone from saving lots of games to their hard drive, then selling them to the friends for say... £35, then they do the same, etc, etc until game companies are broke because they've only had one copy sold.
The solution? Make it so the game has to be uninstalled before you can trade it. This fits in with their 'participating retailers' thing, because you'd need to go to a proper shop so they can verify that you haven't just given them something you're gonna keep playing anyway.
Ah, I hear you say, but why don't they just disconnect the console from live so they can continue playing anyway? Oh wait, Microsoft does the 24 hour check thing so this doesn't happen. Bam.
There's the whole argument of 'ethics of ability to trade games' (Which I'm sure microsoft will protect) versus 'Ability to play halo, fifa, cod and watch movies without getting off my fat arsé' but I think we'll hear more about this that'll clear it up.
Then the internet thing... WHO DOESN'T HAVE INTERNET? My house has been connected to internet 24 hours a day for about 8 years, save the one time I switched from Sky to Virgin and it was down for 5 minutes while they changed it. It's not going to affect anyone who doesn't live in a cave.
---------------------------------------
Now let's address the other issues.
'Kinect is always watching you' No it isn't. It's listening for 'Xbox on' and you can turn that off if you really want to.
And price is the other main point. I agree, it's too much. But the ps3 was $600 when it came out compared to $400 for the highest priced 360, and over a couple of years it evened out. I'm pretty sure they'll be the same eventually.
Microsoft try to justify their cost because of kinect, which is stupid because I don't think Kinect is worth that much to me, even if it does mean I can be lazy as hell. They should sell a model without Kinect, and they could probably do this for the same price as the PS4, with Kinect as an extra you can buy along the line later, LIKE IT IS NOW!
-----------------------------------------------------
I've written this because I don't think the PS4 is the heaven sent console ready to pleasure us like nothing has before and the Xbox ONE is not the console sent by Satan himself to punish us for our sins. Both have good points and bad point and the console war will be a lot closer than people think. Misinformation and premature judgement have led to many people assuming things that simply aren't true and think that the PS4 is like a Ferrari compared to the Nissan Cube that is the Xbox ONE.
There are so many idiots in the world nowadays who believe everything the sensationalist press tell them to believe. Some idiot says 'the PS4 and ONE will cost $600' and half the world thinks that before being rational. Likewise, on the Arsenal board everyday there'll be a new article claiming we've signed someone from a trusted source and claiming that they get everything right even though yesterday's debunked article serves as proof that they were wrong and are usually wrong.
Having said that, Microsoft are behind now, because of a terrible public image and it costing £80 more. They'll need to get their act together to avoid falling behind. IMO, their best bet is to offer a 'Kinect-less ONE' or to include, say, a free copy of Forza 5, an extra controller and a year of live to everyone who buys a ONE before January. Something like that would help to justify the price difference and would put them in a much better position moving forward.
A defence of the Xbox One, and the future
posted on 14/6/13
@The Artist - Enjoy your £429 Blueray player
posted on 14/6/13
I haven't read all the comments (and will do later), I gave the article one star because of one point.
If the XBone is only going to be sold in England and the states and countries with stable net connections, then fine.
But for people who travel, for people who live in other countries for periods of time and do not or may not have a stable connection, MS leaves them in the cold.
And even then, this doesn't take into several other issues that could happen. Such as the servers going down, changing homes and needing to set up your broadband could take a week. During these periods you're left with a glorified blu-ray player.
The point about sharing games...you basically lend your XBone to your friend instead of the game to get around something like borrowing the games from your friend.
The other thing, the games industry isn't unique. The film industry, the book industry and the music industry are also in entertainment medium. Buy DVD and you can only use it on your DVD at home, which has to connect every24 hours in order to connect to check for 'updates' and making sure you are using your own Dvds. You can lend it once to your friend, etc.
If this happens in the game industry and we allow it to happen, expect this to spread to other entertainment, if it hasn't already. Even Adobe are now starting a subscribtion based service and no longer developing their software as they could make money charging 30 quid for 30 days use of one of their software.
I have said this myself, things like this make me want to pirate legit things because their developers/publishers are wakners.
posted on 14/6/13
It depends what Microsoft decide to do. The reason it needs to check in once a day is because games are stored on the hard drive ether than on the disc - it is to check that it isn't just copied then passed on. The way around it is easy, just give the option to play by the disc and then there is no need to check in.
posted on 14/6/13
The idea of being able to play used games (from friends or bought 2nd hand) has always been an important feature to people. Most of my games are bought 2nd hand from places like CeX.
If they wish to do away with this, then they have to introduce a system whereby people are allowed refunds on games which they buy but then realise is rubbish. And that will never happen!
posted on 14/6/13
I really don't get if people are actually looking at what ms are offering or not. The ability to play games on your friends library is a massive step forward
posted on 14/6/13
How come Microsoft didn't mention any of this in the conference? Or I just totally miss it?
posted on 14/6/13
"You know how you can't just give games to your friends on the Xbox ONE? You don't need to. You have a 'family' of 10 friends you can add, where you can share all your games online without having to trade discs and stuff. So if you want to lend someone Forza, you just have to add it to the list and they can play it, as if you had given it to them in real life."
Why don't Microsoft make more of things like this? They must have a really, really crap PR team.
posted on 14/6/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/6/13
good article
posted on 14/6/13
Thanks Digby
Good point Simon If they go the steam approach it will succeed, otherwise it will fail.