If someone told you that ...

"He is under the mistaken impression that using language in the way he does makes him look clever."

Are you going to discuss the article or not, Dramatic.
Your attempts at fallacious rhetoric have died an embarrassing death to date.

I see a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities that they write in a deliberately obscure style. However it's never quite right.

The article? Well you only created it because myhammers put a similar wum on the spurs board, this is just one huge bite. That being the case you never expected and certainly don't deserve any "serious" response.

"I see a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities that they write in a deliberately obscure style. However it's never quite right."

I see.

1. Can you please explain to the 'lacking' among us the "deliberately obscure" in the following text :

<quote>
If someone told you that ...
Spurs had got torn to pieces by Bramble

Would you assume that the Spurs squad had fallen over into the bushes while blackberry picking ??
</quote>


2. And in what way did your feeble attempt at fallacious rhetoric assist in removing the "obscure" ??



"That being the case you never expected and certainly don't deserve any "serious" response. "

I see.
And so you saying exactly the same applies to all such articles by myhammers, one of your 606 kin ??

On the final point, the only one worthy of comment.

Do you know what a rhetorical question is? You obviously don't need to answer that.

A lot of evasion going on from you, Dramatic.

Deciding what is "worthy of comment" is a trait associated with (to use a phrase) , a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities.

No, it's a trait associated with a person who is unwilling to play your silly little games.

"No, it's a trait associated with a person who is unwilling to play your silly little games."

A person whose first comment on an article is ad-hominem fallacious rhetoric, loses the right to make claims on their willingness to play "silly little games" .

Oh look he's been looking up long words again.

No, your not pretentious at all.

Your "thing" on this website is that you're the educated clever one. It's an interesting creation but as flimsy as Sandy pretending to be an OAP.

"Your "thing" on this website is that you're the educated clever one."

And your "thing" is you appear to feel threatened by anyone who may be vaguely more educated than you (whatever that level actually is for you - not looking good to date is it) .

Hence the amusement at your "prententious" dirge, when the first thing you did was write a classic piece of ad-hominem rhetoric (only bettered by the "beating your wife" classic) .

Stay away from my comments. I DARE you to.

Sounds like some people need a