Mention Bramble(s), and there is a collective burying of heads in the sand.
Or maybe just try and converse in English, you plank.
Fatso, you're well off the beaten path here.
Or did the mention of blackberries prove too much for you to resist.
what a shít article.. i'll never get that 1 minute back ( i had to read it half a dozen times) and still couldnt work out what it was about
Oh look it's the sicko known as RDBD.
Jokes about car bombing victims
Article is not for "normal" people like you, dunc.
Dramatic.
And the G00n qualification-deficient fatso with anger management issues.
QED ??
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Admin,
By definition you have to delete Dramatics' comment, because I provided the classic fallacy example to his.
Delete his comment, I haven't even read his comment. I suggest you press the delete button if you want his comment deleted.
comment by The RDBD (demoted to supporting the team managed by Pep Guardiola) (U1062)
posted 26 minutes ago
"A car has exploded inside the main market in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, police say."
Is your concern that the next 20 G00n "world class" players have had their lives tragically cut short ??
---------------
I spy a joke concerning the victims of car bombings.
And, Dramatic ??
Be specific relating that "joke" to the content of this article (if you can) .
Admin1 :
I have no need to.
You removed my example of fallacious comment that shows up Dramatics' feeble attempt.
I say this article should be removed for not only being a WUM but also incomprehensible to those who understand the English Language.
Keep on going, Serial.
Fortunately I am not like you and ban posters from articles they control cos they were called Fatty in a past life.
Serial
He is under the mistaken impression that using language in the way he does makes him look clever.
"He is under the mistaken impression that using language in the way he does makes him look clever."
Are you going to discuss the article or not, Dramatic.
Your attempts at fallacious rhetoric have died an embarrassing death to date.
I see a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities that they write in a deliberately obscure style. However it's never quite right.
The article? Well you only created it because myhammers put a similar wum on the spurs board, this is just one huge bite. That being the case you never expected and certainly don't deserve any "serious" response.
"I see a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities that they write in a deliberately obscure style. However it's never quite right."
I see.
1. Can you please explain to the 'lacking' among us the "deliberately obscure" in the following text :
<quote>
If someone told you that ...
Spurs had got torn to pieces by Bramble
Would you assume that the Spurs squad had fallen over into the bushes while blackberry picking ??
</quote>
2. And in what way did your feeble attempt at fallacious rhetoric assist in removing the "obscure" ??
"That being the case you never expected and certainly don't deserve any "serious" response. "
I see.
And so you saying exactly the same applies to all such articles by myhammers, one of your 606 kin ??
On the final point, the only one worthy of comment.
Do you know what a rhetorical question is? You obviously don't need to answer that.
A lot of evasion going on from you, Dramatic.
Deciding what is "worthy of comment" is a trait associated with (to use a phrase) , a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities.
No, it's a trait associated with a person who is unwilling to play your silly little games.
"No, it's a trait associated with a person who is unwilling to play your silly little games."
A person whose first comment on an article is ad-hominem fallacious rhetoric, loses the right to make claims on their willingness to play "silly little games" .
Oh look he's been looking up long words again.
No, your not pretentious at all.
Your "thing" on this website is that you're the educated clever one. It's an interesting creation but as flimsy as Sandy pretending to be an OAP.
Sign in if you want to comment
If someone told you that ...
Page 1 of 2
posted on 9/7/13
Mention Bramble(s), and there is a collective burying of heads in the sand.
posted on 9/7/13
Or maybe just try and converse in English, you plank.
posted on 9/7/13
Fatso, you're well off the beaten path here.
Or did the mention of blackberries prove too much for you to resist.
posted on 9/7/13
what a shít article.. i'll never get that 1 minute back ( i had to read it half a dozen times) and still couldnt work out what it was about
posted on 9/7/13
I rest my case!!
posted on 9/7/13
Oh look it's the sicko known as RDBD.
Jokes about car bombing victims
posted on 9/7/13
Article is not for "normal" people like you, dunc.
posted on 9/7/13
Dramatic.
And the G00n qualification-deficient fatso with anger management issues.
QED ??
posted on 9/7/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/7/13
Admin,
By definition you have to delete Dramatics' comment, because I provided the classic fallacy example to his.
posted on 9/7/13
Delete his comment, I haven't even read his comment. I suggest you press the delete button if you want his comment deleted.
posted on 9/7/13
comment by The RDBD (demoted to supporting the team managed by Pep Guardiola) (U1062)
posted 26 minutes ago
"A car has exploded inside the main market in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, police say."
Is your concern that the next 20 G00n "world class" players have had their lives tragically cut short ??
---------------
I spy a joke concerning the victims of car bombings.
posted on 9/7/13
And, Dramatic ??
Be specific relating that "joke" to the content of this article (if you can) .
posted on 9/7/13
Admin1 :
I have no need to.
You removed my example of fallacious comment that shows up Dramatics' feeble attempt.
posted on 9/7/13
I say this article should be removed for not only being a WUM but also incomprehensible to those who understand the English Language.
posted on 9/7/13
Keep on going, Serial.
Fortunately I am not like you and ban posters from articles they control cos they were called Fatty in a past life.
posted on 9/7/13
Serial
He is under the mistaken impression that using language in the way he does makes him look clever.
posted on 9/7/13
"He is under the mistaken impression that using language in the way he does makes him look clever."
Are you going to discuss the article or not, Dramatic.
Your attempts at fallacious rhetoric have died an embarrassing death to date.
posted on 9/7/13
I see a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities that they write in a deliberately obscure style. However it's never quite right.
The article? Well you only created it because myhammers put a similar wum on the spurs board, this is just one huge bite. That being the case you never expected and certainly don't deserve any "serious" response.
posted on 9/7/13
"I see a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities that they write in a deliberately obscure style. However it's never quite right."
I see.
1. Can you please explain to the 'lacking' among us the "deliberately obscure" in the following text :
<quote>
If someone told you that ...
Spurs had got torn to pieces by Bramble
Would you assume that the Spurs squad had fallen over into the bushes while blackberry picking ??
</quote>
2. And in what way did your feeble attempt at fallacious rhetoric assist in removing the "obscure" ??
"That being the case you never expected and certainly don't deserve any "serious" response. "
I see.
And so you saying exactly the same applies to all such articles by myhammers, one of your 606 kin ??
posted on 9/7/13
On the final point, the only one worthy of comment.
Do you know what a rhetorical question is? You obviously don't need to answer that.
posted on 9/7/13
A lot of evasion going on from you, Dramatic.
Deciding what is "worthy of comment" is a trait associated with (to use a phrase) , a pretentious individual who so lacks confidence in there own intellectual abilities.
posted on 9/7/13
No, it's a trait associated with a person who is unwilling to play your silly little games.
posted on 9/7/13
"No, it's a trait associated with a person who is unwilling to play your silly little games."
A person whose first comment on an article is ad-hominem fallacious rhetoric, loses the right to make claims on their willingness to play "silly little games" .
posted on 9/7/13
Oh look he's been looking up long words again.
No, your not pretentious at all.
Your "thing" on this website is that you're the educated clever one. It's an interesting creation but as flimsy as Sandy pretending to be an OAP.
Page 1 of 2