or to join or start a new Discussion

171 Comments
Article Rating 4.33 Stars

Chelsea deny Mata/Luiz - OFFICIAL

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy 1m
Chelsea confirm that they have made bid for Wayne Rooney but deny that offer included Mata or Luiz. Statement from club shortly ...

"Chelsea Football Club can confirm that yesterday it made a written offer to Manchester United for the transfer of Wayne Rooney.

Terms of the offer are confidential, for avoidance of doubt and contrary to what is apparently being briefed to the press in Sydney..

The proposed purchase price does not include the transfer or loan of any players from Chelsea to Manchester United."


BBC, Sky Sports, Guardian etc were talking out their crack.

posted on 17/7/13

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 17/7/13

posted on 17/7/13

Great. Elvis is stalking us..

Elvis, where's that bloke Raj?

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 17/7/13

He's right here with me.

<gimpmask>

comment by BlueJ2 (U4630)

posted on 17/7/13

I'm actually quite shocked that Man Utd would leak something that ridiculous. I have always thought of Man Utd as an honest club - and have not been terribly impressed by how Chelsea management have conducted business in recent years. However, I have to say that this story about Mata & Luiz smacks of just being an outright lie - which Chelsea were immediately able to deny. Man Utd have come out of this looking really poor. Lying about players from other teams - that is very low. They may be frustrated by the Rooney saga, but that is of their own creation - it's not Chelsea's fault.

posted on 17/7/13

comment by The_Red_Cognoscente (U9741)



posted 4 hours, 38 minutes ago


HNIC, my value for Rooney has not changed - not a penny less than 50M.

I might be the chief detractor of Rooney but he is still an elite forward and an extremely marketable footballer (Mata is currently a better footballer than Rooney but Mata does not have a quarter of Rooney's marketability); also strikers cost a premium and Chelsea are loaded.

For those reasons and more (which i have stated many times before), i won't sell Shrek for a penny less than 50m pounds.

PS

I must add, just like i have been saying all year, this is Rooney's last chance for his big payday and IMO, will most likely be staying at United.

It is all a big game of chicken.
__________________________

Hard to disagree with any of that. That said, I would grab £30m with both hands if it was offered, purely because of the circumstances surrounding the proposed transfer. If Roo was happy and none of this had ever boiled over - i.e. if it was a truly "unsolicited" bid - then £30m would be robbery when you consider what clubs like Chelsea have paid for other players. £30m is also his true value as a footballer though imo, when you ignore the marketability factor.



"Well if we did include Mata and then lied about it, we'd be digging ourselves a bigger hole. There's not many times you see a club make a statement like we have, to confirm a bid and reject the possibility of any of our players being included in that deal as it leaves us open for Utd to reply with their own "Chelsea are lying" statement."
______________________

Would never happen. And I doubt United or Chelsea would lie about it anyway. Somebody did but I wouldn't blame either club tbh.

posted on 17/7/13

Man Utd have come out of this looking really poor. Lying about players from other teams - that is very low
____________________

And entirely fabricated by you. What makes you think United lied about this? What evidence to you have? Is it not plausible that a journo just made this up, or made assumptions that proved to be invalid?

comment by BlueJ2 (U4630)

posted on 17/7/13

comment by redmisty (U7556)

posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago

Man Utd have come out of this looking really poor. Lying about players from other teams - that is very low
____________________

And entirely fabricated by you. What makes you think United lied about this? What evidence to you have? Is it not plausible that a journo just made this up, or made assumptions that proved to be invalid?

---------------------------
First of all - it wasn't "fabricated" by me. The press discovered that a bid had been made by Chelsea for Rooney - apparently this rumour came out of Sydney where Man Utd happen to be based. So far so good - that part turned out to be true. But why would that journalist then make up the information that Chelsea offered Mata and/or Luiz in part exchange? That part of the statement was immediately denied by Chelsea, who also suggested that someone in Sydney had spread the rumour. The only people to benefit from something like that would be Man Utd officials (who happened to be in Sydney) who knew the truth of the situation but wanted to create trouble for Chelsea.

I am the first to admit when Chelsea management make idiotic moves (it is frequent) - but this time it was Man Utd at fault. I'm sure Moyes himself wouldn't do something like this - but it can't have helped the pressure on him. Man Utd (whether you like to agree or not) have come out of this looking very petty.

posted on 17/7/13

Personally I thaught jose was out of order last week when he used his press conferance to publicly tap up rooney. It was disrespectfull to moyes and utd...

posted on 17/7/13

comment by BlueJ2 (U4630)
_________________

So, to sum up...you have no clue and are making assumptions based on nothing at all...

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 4.33 from 6 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available