I was hoping that you guys could provide me some explanation as to the club and allys support of Ian Black.
The reason I ask is that when you compare it with sandaza's offence he seems to have got of very lightly. Sandaza was duped by some fan with to much time on his hands to talking about his contract and a move. When asked to slag off mccoist and the fans he actually refused to do so. It's a shame how things worked out. A case of a player trying too hard.
Whereas Black has bet against the club. Surely that's wrong on every level and a case for a sacking if ever there was one. Now the detail about it is very sketchy and maybe there are facts I am not aware of which is why I am asking the good folks of 606 if they have any explanation as they seem to know everything.
So Ian Black whats the story?
Explanation required
posted on 17/9/13
Can we please just drop this hair malarkey, I'm folically challenged
posted on 17/9/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/9/13
Whether he's the only current Gers player who has bet against the club or not, he's most definitely not the 1st recent player to do so. Players do crazy sh it
As it happens, I'm yet to hear of one winning after betting against us right enough
Calls to sack him are pretty ludicrous. Let's just move on and try keep the bulk of the chat about on-field issues for once
posted on 17/9/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/9/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/9/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/9/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/9/13
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/9/13
Sandaza asked to be sent a job contract behind the club's back.
Black put on some wee accumulator bets.
posted on 17/9/13
One nil moshni